Marilyn
Brooklyn,#2Consumer Suggestion
Thu, September 28, 2006
whoever have the last laught....laugh better! I am glad that finally you got what you and your family deserved. I believe that Dyers is the bad wolf dressed up like a sheep. Dyers like many others so called Christians acts like real evils. Good luck! MARY NY
Brian
RIVERSIDE,#3REBUTTAL Individual responds
Thu, April 28, 2005
Hey, I was bringing up the facts. The park is a great opportunity, if you want to give illegal aliens a place to say. Your park managers are shady, they cover thier own asses, which I can appriciate. Of course there was a written agreement for termination. I clearly stated that I got some of the money back. And your loss of 3000 is interesting, even if I did sign it. Did you reduce the price of the mobile home by 3000? I doubt it. I spoke with Ian Dyer twice and he was the most condescending character I have ever had contacted. I will pray for him. I have to thank Dyer for the lesson, though. I learned alot from this. Will my family be buying a home, yes. It wont be a run-down mobile home in a run-down park, managed by run-down individuals. Thank you MiracleMansions.com you made my dreams come true!
Ian
San Clemente,#4REBUTTAL Individual responds
Thu, April 28, 2005
Brian Scott Wissinger is not telling the truth. The program he signed up for is a great program. It has helped a LOT of people. He is the only one out of approximately thirty who has had his contract cancelled. It was completely his fault. The best proof are the facts stated in the written agreement SIGNED BY BRIAN WISSINGER to terminate the original agreement: RECITALS A. Tenants [WISSINGER] are parties to a lease agreement with option to purchase dated January 21, 2005 (hereinafter referred to as the Lease Agreement).... B. Tenants have breached the agreement in a number of ways. One example is that Tenants demolished the patio cover, without authorization, at an expense to Dyer of $3,000.00 or more. Tenants also moved their belongings and vehicle onto the property in violation of the agreement. Tenants have also broken other park rules and breached the agreement in other ways. C. Nonetheless, Dyer offered Tenants a choice. Dyer wanted to be compassionate to this family as they have two young daughters. Dyer offered them another chance to completely comply with the agreement. D. Dyer also offered another option. Tenants and Dyer can agree to cancel the agreement. Dyer, while feeling nothing was due to Tenants due to the expenses to Dyer of Tenants breach, nonetheless did not want Tenants to be at a significant financial loss, given their precarious financial situation and young children. Therefore, Dyer offered, as consideration for the cancellation, to pay $2,100.00 to Tenants, to reimburse their down payment, rent payment and materials costs. Dyer does not feel the materials added value to the property even in the amount being reimbursed but nevertheless offered this money in order to assist Tenants so they will not be sleeping in the park as stated to Nathan Torres by Tenant Brian Wissinger. E. Tenants elected this second option of being paid the $2,100.00 as they do not have the money to rebuild the patio which they demolished and sold for scrap. That's the facts, with BRIAN WISSINGER'S SIGNATURE ATTESTING TO THEM. (No rights are waived by this posting, including original jurisdictional rights). If you have questions about this program or Mr. Wissinger's claims, feel free to contact us directly at 949-488-3937.