- Report: #722088
Complaint Review: Margo Rausenberger - ((Statement REDACTED as false pursuant to Ripoff Report VIP ((Statement REDACTED as false pursuant t
Reported By:
sarah -
Superior, Colorado, United States of America
Submitted:
Updated:
-
Author Not Confirmed
Why?
Margo Rausenberger
((Statement REDACTED as false pursuant to Ripoff Report VIP Arbitration)) ((Statement REDACTED as false pursuant to Ripoff Report VIP, ((Statement REDACTED as false ((Statement REDACTED as false pursuant t, United States of America
Phone:
((Statement REDACTED as f
Web:
((Statement REDACTED as false pursuant to Ripoff Report VIP Arbitration))
Categories:
Business Rating:
(0)
Tell us has your experience with this business or person been good?
Complaint Review: Margo Rausenberger | Notice: Ripoff Report VIP Arbitration Decision: A neutral and independent Arbitrator has determined that the following Report contained one or more false statements of facts. The false statements have been redacted as ((Statement REDACTED as false pursuant to Ripoff Report VIP Arbitration)) | Furthermore, the Arbitrator determined that the Report was not written by a former client, but rather by a disgruntled former co-worker. ((Statement REDACTED as false pursuant to Ripoff Report VIP Arbitration))! Broomfield, Colorado
RIPOFF REPORT VIP ARBITRATION
SUMMARY OF ARBITRATOR’S DECISION
Margo Rausenberger, Esq., Complainant
v.
Anonymous, Author of Report #722088,
________________________________________________________________________
Complainant Margo Rausenberger (the “Complainant”) has challenged the truthfulness of certain specific statements (each, a “Statement”) posted by Author Anonymous (the “Author”) on the Ripoff Report website at www.ripoffreport.com as Ripoff Report #722088 (the “Report”). The Author accused the Complainant of failing to provide satisfactory legal services. The Complainant denied all such accusations. The Author did not submit a response to the Complainant or any contact information. Therefore, in accordance with the Ripoff Report VIP Arbitration Rules (the “Rules), the Author waived their right to participate in this Arbitration. The Report was presumably submitted by a “Sarah”, but the Complainant provided evidence that they never had a client by that name. By submitting a Report and a Complaint on the Ripoff Report websites, both the Complainant and the Author have agreed to submit the dispute to the Ripoff Report VIP Arbitration Program.
In accordance with the Rules, the Arbitrator was asked to decide whether the challenged Statements were an opinion or a fact. If, and only if, the Statement was determined to be a statement of fact, the Arbitrator was asked to further decided if, by a preponderance of the evidence, to determine if the Statement was true or false. If the statement identified by the Complainant is determined to be an opinion, no determination will be made as to that particular Statement because an opinion cannot be determined to be true nor false.
In this case, the Arbitrator had only the evidence submitted by the Complainant to consider. The evidence submitted included Ripoff Report #722088, Complainant’s Arbitration Statement, Complainant’s Witness Statements, and supporting documentation.
Each Statement challenged by the Complainant has been considered, together with any Witness Statements and Documents provided by the Complainant for determination of the truth or falsity of the Statement. The Author did not provide a response to the Complaint.
The Arbitrator determined that the certain statements challenged in the Report were false. Therefore, according to the VIP Arbitration Rules, those statements have been redacted.
Decided December 14, 2014
Bruce E. Meyerson, Arbitrator
* A copy of the full Arbitrator’s Decision is available upon request. Please e-mail [email protected] with the name of the Complainant and Report number.
_____________________________________
((Statement REDACTED as false pursuant to Ripoff Report VIP Arbitration)). ((Statement REDACTED as false pursuant to Ripoff Report VIP Arbitration)).
((Statement REDACTED as false pursuant to Ripoff Report VIP Arbitration)). ((Statement REDACTED as false pursuant to Ripoff Report VIP Arbitration)). ((Statement REDACTED as false pursuant to Ripoff Report VIP Arbitration)).
4 Updates & Rebuttals
Heather
Irving,Texas,
Sarah's report has absolutely no truth to it
#2UPDATE EX-employee responds
Sat, February 01, 2014
I worked with Margo Rausenberger doing tax resolution at 20/20 for almost 2 years. I also worked at Omni Financial previously for almost 3 years. Margo was by far the most professional, deticated and result oriented person I ever worked with. She is compassionate and hard working for her clients. She would never represent herself or her abilities.
MargoR
Boulder,Colorado,
United States of America
NOTICE OF LAWSUIT
#3REBUTTAL Individual responds
Fri, May 25, 2012
Please take notice that Margo Rausenberger has initiated an action in the Boulder
County District Court, Boulder County, Colorado, Case No. 2012-CV-328, due to
false and defamatory statements made by you (the "Action"). In the
Action, Ms. Rausenberger is seeking to subpoena the records of Xcentric
Ventures LLC for your contact information and any other messages that you have
posted on the website Rip Off Report, www.ripoffreport.com, under the pseudonym
"Sarah - Superior" or any other pseudonym, about Ms. Rausenberger, to
the Louisville, CO office of Thomas P. Howard, LLC at 842 W. South Boulder Rd.,
Louisville, CO 80302 in compliance with FRCP Rule 45.
If you do not respond by June 1, 2012 with your true and correct contact
information to: Thomas P. Howard, Esq. via email ([email protected] ) or
facsimile (303-665-9847), we will seek production of the records via subpoena
as outlined above.
You may have a right to file and serve a response to the subpoena anonymously.
If you intend to file and serve a response, please do so on or before June 11,
2012.
John Q Public
Denver,Colorado,
United States of America
Sara Cohen is NOT telling the truth
#4General Comment
Mon, August 29, 2011
Saracohen21 posted a malicious lie about someone on this site because she is infantile and cowardly. Do not trust a word she says. She does not own a dry cleaning business. she is a former attorney who used to work in the tax arena and was fired for dereliction of duty. Nothing she says is true.
The great thing about the internet is
that it allows people to truly express themselves in an unfettered,
unregulated manner. It is a true expression of freedom of speech. This
has a downside when someone like Saracohen21 can damage someone's reputation by flat out lying and there is no recourse for the person whose reputation has been damaged
MargoR
Boulder,Colorado,
United States of America
This Report is False
#5REBUTTAL Individual responds
Mon, June 20, 2011
This is Margo Rausenberger. Your statements here are completely fabricated. I never worked for Omni Financial, and I have been a licensed attorney for about 18 years. All of this information can easily be verified.
You are not a former client, you are a former coworker who was terminated and is now holding a grudge. Your way to get back at me and my company is to make up false stories about me and the
attorneys I work with and post them on the internet. You are the same Sarah who claims to have hired me at 20/20 Financial and the same Sarah who says you worked with me for 3 years. It is so obvious you are the same person making up all these stories about being both a coworker and a client.
I know who you are, and I intend to file a lawsuit against you for defamation. It would be wise for you retract this statement immediately.
