Merchant Lynx Services
West Palm Beach,#2UPDATE Employee
Mon, December 29, 2008
Belinda, We have done every thing in our power to try and help you and your husband Donald, When we went to court on this matter October 7 /08 and the courts favored in "Merchant Lynx Services" favor under a court of law, we opted to sign a new lease with your company so you would not be hit with the fees that your company had accumilated over the time that the lease was not being paid. Please stop sending in bogus complaints about Merchant Lynx Services, We allready went to court and appeared in front of a judge and was awarded a judgement against your company, Unless you feel that the Judge of the court was wrong to. If you need any help with your account please feel free to contact our customer service dept. thank you, MGMT.
Belinda
Lauderhill,#3Consumer Comment
Wed, October 15, 2008
Tim Nardini took me to court 10/7/2008 because he said the contract signed is non cancellable and the owners of the leasing corporation wanted the machine and money back. I received a copy of notice to appear on 10/2/2008. I sent the machine back August 2007 last year however they lied and said it wasn't received. They forced me to sign a new contract. I hope the investigators do a surprise visit to 1307 Walt Whitman Road Melville New York 11747 address with a search warrant to see how deceiving this corp. I called Federal Trade Commission and filed a report. I have other government authorities to contact as well as an Attorney. There's a 3 days to cancel policy that was violated since Tim Nardini called/ solicited me, then he's suppose to let everyone know this and give them the form. He did not do that for me. MLS 866-873-2200 number is for Annapolis Maryland. The BBB here in West Palm Beach, FL. said I have to file complaint there. 10/13/2008 Tim tried to get me to use my personal account number for payments. The original contract was for Headlights Pro and it will stay that way. Be very careful These are some real con artist.
David
Las Vegas,#4Consumer Suggestion
Sun, August 10, 2008
You got the shaft on this one... The salesman is getting good commissions on equipment and it is likely the lease payments are also higher than industry norms so he has a lot to lose. Also because the terminal was sent to the agent and not to you, the leasing company shows the lease is delivered. If the terminal was sent to you and you refused delivery (didn't sign for the package and sent the UPS guy right back out the door without taking delivery) then the lease would be canceled as soon as UPS returned the package under the same tracking number. In this case, the agent took delivery and is bringing you your terminal. Technically in this case as long as you don't take delivery of the terminal, the lease is not legally fulfilled. The agent is actually most likely liable for the terminal and will have to buy out the lease himself... that's why you're getting the push back.
David
Las Vegas,#5Consumer Suggestion
Sun, August 10, 2008
You got the shaft on this one... The salesman is getting good commissions on equipment and it is likely the lease payments are also higher than industry norms so he has a lot to lose. Also because the terminal was sent to the agent and not to you, the leasing company shows the lease is delivered. If the terminal was sent to you and you refused delivery (didn't sign for the package and sent the UPS guy right back out the door without taking delivery) then the lease would be canceled as soon as UPS returned the package under the same tracking number. In this case, the agent took delivery and is bringing you your terminal. Technically in this case as long as you don't take delivery of the terminal, the lease is not legally fulfilled. The agent is actually most likely liable for the terminal and will have to buy out the lease himself... that's why you're getting the push back.
Vms - enetwork
Vero Beach,#6Author of original report
Wed, June 18, 2008
Here we are again. I thought this had all been sorted out, Merchant Lynx came in and we signed a new agreement. However, now there are four or five charges EVERY month that were never mentioned in the contract and in fact, I specifically told them we were NOT going to pay. iAccess Fees $9.95 - twice per month Bankcard Mtot Disc (no other description) $30.00; $30.20; and $37.95 each month. All this on top of the monthly 'rental' of the unit. I am definitely in the wrong business! I have asked Gena (I think) four times now to have the charges credited to our bank account. So far, only the $9.95 amt's have been credited. So I will let you know what happens from here. Stay tuned. I would think with these dirty practices, they would be out of business by now but I honestly believe that most don't realize these charges are even coming from Merchant Lynx....or too busy to keep up with pestering them to stop and/or credit the amounts back. Anyone know of class action suits?
Cory
San Antonio,#7Consumer Comment
Mon, March 31, 2008
That's why I dumped 'em after 13 years. It started going downhill when they got bought out by RBS. Referred a couple of new businesses to my old rep. Once I found out how she was trying to d**k them over, I stopped. They were getting as bad as transtec with all their fees. There ought to be something you can do about your situation. You have the first contract, then a second contract. Tell them If they keep it up, you're gonna contact an attorney. IF they still do, go ahead and contact one. Make sure and send all mail certified.
Vms - enetwork
Vero Beach,#8Author of original report
Fri, March 28, 2008
Following printing out pages of the bad reports on Merchant Lynx, sending a scathing letter, we were called by Gena who is Mr. Beniamino's assistant. She was very helpful and they are supposedly returning the charges to our bank account. All in all, I'd say (even though it took getting nasty to get there), Merchant Lynx came through. I hope you all have the same satisfactory resolution. VMS enetwork Vero Beach, FL