- Report: #1097281
Complaint Review: Provincial Court of British Columbia - Vancouver, BC British Columbia
-
Author Not Confirmed
Why?
Provincial Court of British Columbia
800 Hornby Street Vancouver, BC, V6Z 2C5 British Columbia, Canada
Phone:
Phone: (604) 660-2864
Web:
http://www.provincialcourt.bc.ca/
Categories:
Business Rating:
(0)
Tell us has your experience with this business or person been good?
Provincial Court of British Columbia Judicial J Zahid Makhdoom The Chief Judge of the Provincial Court of British Columbia Muslim Koran in the Canadian Court Room, British Columbia Provincial Court, by Muslim Judge Zahid Makhdoom Vancouver, British Columbia CANADA
Report Attachments
This complaint is made on behalf of the public:
Take notice that it is alleged that the British Columbia Provincial Court allows a Muslim Judicial Justice of Peace aka Provincial Court Judge to bring into the courtroom a Koran, which is the Islamic book of Muslim law.
The BC Provincial courtroom correctly leaves the Bible in the courtroom; however, the Koran is also brought by and through the presence of Muslim Zahid Makhdoom in the Robson Square location located in downtown Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. The Koran teaches that women are inferior to men, as we understand it.
Muslim Makhdoom refused to hold a male witness responsible despite the fact that the witness admitted to defying a court-ordered summons to appear and give evidence in court, according to records; when in fact the witness went on vacation instead, on his own admission in the records. We understand that Makhdoom J. permitted this contempt of court of the witness to go unpunished, and did so at the expense of the BC tax-payers and the person who summoned the witness, a student who is Jewish and a female.
We understand that Makhdoom J. spent several months in prison in Pakistan, according to a website of a Pakistani organization in which Makhdoom claims to be president. We understand that Pakistan is a primitive society that does not respect women or their rights. We understand that Pakistani women are often the subject of abuse by men, and that Islamic law does not protect them in Pakistan.
We understand that while Makhdoom J. was a judicial justice of the peace, he has publicly attacked the actions of the United States government and Israel, contrary to the ethical guidelines by which Makhdoom J. is bound, which requires him to govern himself accordingly.
We understand that Office of the Chief Judge Crabtree refused to question Muslim Makhdoom's action of bringing the Koran into the courtroom, which is supposed to be a medium for the administration of justice and rather than for discrimination against any persons.
We understand that a formal complaint has been made to the Office of the Chief Judge Crabtree against Makhdoom, Zahid. We will update the status thereof once we are informed thereabout. Wherefore, we respectfully submit this complaint on behalf of the public, particularly the women of British Columbia.
The Anti-Defamation League was founded in 1913 "to stop the defamation of the Jewish people and to secure justice and fair treatment to all."
2 Updates & Rebuttals
David
Vancouver,British Columbia,
Zahid Makdhoom was the subject of past complaints
#2Consumer Comment
Mon, November 18, 2013
In the Supreme Court of British Columbia
|
R. v. Vasquez, |
|
2012 BCSC 1648
|
Regina
v.
Carlos Vasquez and Dorothy Villanueva
The appellant’s grounds of appeal of their convictions are that they did not receive a fair trial, that Judicial Justice of the Peace Zahid Makdhoom who conducted the trial failed to give effect to relevant evidence, and that Makhdoom, JJ belittled and insulted them.
Tyg
Pahrump,Nevada,
And...
#3General Comment
Wed, November 06, 2013
The ADL acts no better then the religions they suppose to represent. Seems to me that this post is more defaming then a ANTI-DEFIMATION LEAGUE should be doing. I mean really is this what the ADL is about. Cyber attacking a judiciary action? YOU may not agree with this individuals actions, but to bring in the ADL on a post like this. Your tin foil hat rant sounds surprisingly ONE SIDED. ANY judge brings thier own experiences to the bench. Including religion. Its all part and parcel of being a human creature. As long as no LAWS were broken, the judge CAN and DOES have the right to ignore minor infractions. Such as contempt of court.
What YOU are doing is called cyber bullying. YOU dont like this person for OBVIOUS religous reasons. YOU have decided that YOU will do something about this. And now to add to your list of crimes. You are bashing him for his religion and his beliefs. Is any of this getting through to you??
So once again the oppressed become the oppresors. YOU dont like the judges views so YOU are now the oppressor. How does it feel knowing that you are attempting to ruin a man and his career because YOU disagree with which version of god he choses to believe in. YOUR narrow mindedness truly sickens me.
