Ride In Style
Laguna Niguel,#2UPDATE Employee
Sat, February 16, 2008
I was there the day that Andrew showed up late for his detailing appointment, and during the negotiations to do the work in trade. The job he did was horrendous, to say the least. There were wax patches on both cars from bumper to bumper, the insides had not been done, the mirrors hadn't been cleaned nor had either of the bars in both vehicles. One of the limousines had the decanter holder broken, and another had the rubber seal inside the trunk broken. He had just started working on the second vehicle when the owner stepped out to pick up his son. Andrew and his associate immediately left. The owner returned after about 10 minutes and he called Andrew to inquire how they could've detailed a limousine in just 10 minutes. Andrew had no answer. The owner was very disappointed with the 'work' performed but still agreed to honor the agreement of trade. Two weeks later we received an emailed invoice demanding $225 (NOT $500 as stated in his claim). We received repeated invoices for this amount, and each time there was a reply sent detailing our dissatisfaction but that the original trade agreement would still be honored. Not only did Andrew never respond, nor was any money ever agreed upon other than trade to try out the initial service, but the work performed was a disaster and costly, as items on both vehicles had been broken by the incompetence of Andrew Galinski and his associate. Since then we have received numerous invoices all for $255, yet now Andrew has posted this fraudulent and slanderous posting claiming it was $500 and that he was 'ripped off' when in fact we were the ones that were ripped off. Because of these fradulent, slanderous statements posted on the internet for the world to see, these matters will be dealt with legally from this point forward. Heidi Ride in Style Limousines