- Report: #772165
Complaint Review: S Bar Pittsburgh - Pittsburgh Pennsylvania
-
Author Confirmed
Why?
S Bar Pittsburgh
1713 East Carson Street Pittsburgh, 15203 Pennsylvania, United States of America
Phone:
412-481-7227
Web:
www.sbarpgh.com
Categories:
Business Rating:
(0)
Tell us has your experience with this business or person been good?
S Bar Pittsburgh william l regas II holds first promotion of prostitution party for indys.com with site owner William L. Regas II (pimp) Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
The S Bar Pittsburgh hosted its first promotion of prostitution private party along with indys.com website owner/operator, William L. Regas II, who is a pimp. The promotion of prostitution party was held Tuesday, August 23, 2011 from 7pm until an unknown time. The parties are private and closed to the general public. The website invites its "vouched" members to attend the party via a thread posted on indys.com in a "secure" area. The members interested in attending then respond to the thread with a RSVP. The party destination is revealed a short time before the party is to commence for "security" reasons. Tricks pay to enter the party. Prostitutes have free admission.
Who are the bar service workers at this party? One would think for "security" reasons it would be volunteers from the prostitution website. But bar/club liability issues probably prevent this scenario from occurring. so the owner of the venue is either given a contrived story from William L. Regas II, prostitution website owner, about the nature of the party or the bar/club owner is complicit in what the nature of the party is. From a very credible source, it has been confirmed that the S Bar Pittsburgh owner told his/her employees that they were scheduled to work a "swinger" private party. Thus putting anyone who is not at the party of their own volition in an awkward position. Some disturbing potential scenarios that could be an outcome of duping the employees to work this party: Potential pictures of attendees, either inadvertently or purposefully, could have been taken by the employees. Other personal information of the attendees may also be available depending on what form of payment was used at the venue connecting the attendees to the party, etc.
If the employees working the "private party" arent told the truth about the nature of the party then how can they be expected to be held to a certain standard of rules that the prostitutes/tricks/website owner are expecting the employees to be held to? like anonymity? just creepy and kooky.
this is a PSA! not a debate on whether private parties for prostitutes and johns are appropriate. but please feel free to comment.
Who are the bar service workers at this party? One would think for "security" reasons it would be volunteers from the prostitution website. But bar/club liability issues probably prevent this scenario from occurring. so the owner of the venue is either given a contrived story from William L. Regas II, prostitution website owner, about the nature of the party or the bar/club owner is complicit in what the nature of the party is. From a very credible source, it has been confirmed that the S Bar Pittsburgh owner told his/her employees that they were scheduled to work a "swinger" private party. Thus putting anyone who is not at the party of their own volition in an awkward position. Some disturbing potential scenarios that could be an outcome of duping the employees to work this party: Potential pictures of attendees, either inadvertently or purposefully, could have been taken by the employees. Other personal information of the attendees may also be available depending on what form of payment was used at the venue connecting the attendees to the party, etc.
If the employees working the "private party" arent told the truth about the nature of the party then how can they be expected to be held to a certain standard of rules that the prostitutes/tricks/website owner are expecting the employees to be held to? like anonymity? just creepy and kooky.
this is a PSA! not a debate on whether private parties for prostitutes and johns are appropriate. but please feel free to comment.
