- Report: #476768
Complaint Review: Stilas Law Firm - New York New York
-
Author Confirmed
Why?
Stilas Law Firm
www.stilas.us New York, New York, U.S.A.
Web:
N/A
Categories:
Business Rating:
(0)
Tell us has your experience with this business or person been good?
Stilas Law Firm STAY AWAY...SCAM New York New York
STAY AWAY FROM THIS COMPANY!!!Stilas AND BDE -Corp are scams. I was dumb enough to send in my money and poof...they stopped all communication except that from their "legals" department asking for more documents. They ignored EVERY single correspondent AFTER they recieved my 100k. They do not give out any new closings because they have NONE! Their New York office is a virtual office and no one works their. That is why you can't just go to thier office, however, they will not meet you in person either! I have talked to MANY brokers that work with BDE/ STILAS and they stated they never funded anything and they know they will not fund anything. Instead they charge clients up front processing fees of 20k. From personal experiences, STAY FAR AWAY FROM STIALS, BDE (A BROKER WHO IS NOT LICENSED), AND ANY BROKER THAT WORKS WITH STILAS. If the broker will not tell you who the program is going through after an NDA, it is because it is being sent to these frauds!
DON'T DO IT! LISTEN TO EVERYONE ON HERE SAY NOT TO.
Warning
everywhere, Florida
U.S.A.
DON'T DO IT! LISTEN TO EVERYONE ON HERE SAY NOT TO.
Warning
everywhere, Florida
U.S.A.
1 Updates & Rebuttals
Licensed Litigator
New York,New York,
U.S.A.
FALSE COMPLAINT HAS NO CREDIBILITY
#2UPDATE Employee
Sun, August 09, 2009
In the 15 year history of the multiple licensed firm complained about, there is no single client who was ever (A) from Florida (B) came through the broker firm mentionned, and (C) paid $100,000 retainer amount. Neither the firm nor the broker mentionned ever charged any fees of $20,000 at all. The Wall Street office has been fully rented furnished branded and staffed for years. Neither the firm nor broker uses any so-called "NDA" at all, and thus cannot use one to hide the legitimate source of licensed services. Claims of "no communication" are false because the processing department of the firm has a track record of 48 hour response to inquiries, and the top executives write periodic update reports to all clients every couple months. The firm does disclose truthful descriptions of recent closings and there are independently verified press releases elsewhere on the internet with such positive information. Thus, this complaint is completely false in every detail, and appears to be completely fictitious. Anybody who has ever been a real client knows that all of these claims are false. There is only one client from Florida through that broker who paid only $85,000 (not the amount claimed), and they severely breached their valid binding contract with the firm, misrepresented their project, completely refused to provide any materials to work with, and willfully refused to cooperate with the services in any way. Furthermore, that client company - itself fraudulent and criminal - is the subject of a federal criminal complaint against them for extortion against the firm. Law firms and detective agencies hired by the legitimate firm are working on prosecuting this and related individuals to defend the rights of the firm, for the benefit of its real clients. One person who evidence shows is directly behind this and other online complaints is facing 130 years in prison for federal extortion crimes against this same firm. Accordingly, anyone cooperating with these people making false defamatory complaints is risking their own criminal liabilities for unlawful combination, aiding and abetting extortion and racketeering. These people are using false and illegal online defamation against the good firm, knowing that their statements are provably false, to criminally extort the firm into giving them loans while they are guilty of fraud and are not qualified for any loans, and have gotten themselves blacklisted by banks. This complaint is not only false, but nothing but an illegal attempt by criminals to demand things they are not qualified for due to their own criminal misconduct.
