Complaint Review: Supreme Court - Tallahassee Florida

THE SUPREME COURT

THE UNCONSTITUTIONAL FOURTH BRANCH OF GOVERNMENT

Please forgive some of errors on this page as it is hard to justify everything.

THE SUPREME COURT HAS UNCONSTITUTIONALLY MORPHED

( EVOLVED ) INTO THE FOURTH BRANCH OF GOVERNMENT WHOS IDEALOGOGY CONTROLS THE DIRECTION OF THE STATE BY REGULATING ( CONTROLLING )THE LAWYERS WHO PRACTICE THERE, AND IN TURN, THE LAWYER IS THE DECICIVE FACTOR OF WHO WINS IN A COURT BATTLE OF RIGHT AND WRONG, and for POWER AND PROMINANCE, AND SOMETIMES WITH THE GUIDENCE OF THE COURT, Sue Sponte.

There are no checks and balances; no transparency; And for those who have felt the wrath of greedy lawyers know that: the Bar is a part of the Supreme Court; and the members of the Bar are considered Officers of the Court; And are regarded as Judges of the Court; And if you research some of the cases where the Bar examiners have been sued you will see they have been successful when they use the veil of immunity of the Supreme Court to thwart the law. The truth of the matter is that the Florida Supreme Court is not a licensing agency.

THE REGULATION OF LAWYERS

THE FLORIDA SUPREME COURT BAR IS NOT A LICENSING AGENCY AND ITS INTEGRATION INTO THE SUPREME COURT IS PRHIBITED BY THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION AND THE FLORIDA CONSTITUTION.

ARTICLE III section I of the United States Constitution states:

the supreme court shall operate as one court;

Article V of the Florida Constitution states: the power to regulate the practice of law shall be vested in the Supreme Court of the state, not integrate the ( Bar ) practice of law into the Supreme Court of the state. The United States Constitution, AND The Florida State Constitution goes on to state that THE SUPREME COURT SHALL NOT be integrated and operate in divisions ( split into divisions ).

Under the Florida Constitution this prohibition can be found in Article V, 7 and 20, schedule for Article V, 10 of the Florida Constitution that states:

The Supreme Court shall not be bifurcated.

In 1968 the scheme to incorporate The Florida Supreme Court and The Bar was just that, a scheme , to co-mingle these entities and create the Unconstitutional Board of the Bar of the Florida Supreme Court. By doing so, the Florida Supreme Court is in complete control of the legal system here in Florida: The Court grants the Lawyers their license and their discretion, take away that same license if deemed necessary for the Usurped administration of the practice of the law.

In a little known case of 1983 this concept is well documented.

The Florida Supreme Court cannot pass judgment on its own decisions. Ins v. Chada 462 U.S. 919 (1983 ). No Legislative Veto!

This case states that there are no checks and balances when an entity gets to make the rules, and then gets to decide what rules it will follow. Here The Florida Supreme Court has done just that by UNCONSTITUTIONALLY integrating the Florida Bar( An administrative Board/Court) into The Agency of The Court, thereby bifurcating the Court in strict Prohibition of the United States Constitution , and The Florida Constitution.

There have been many challenges to the Supreme Court on the make up and distribution of power of the Court, but some-how The Supreme Court keeps winning its own cases; I mean, keeps winning the cases brought before it on charges of abuse of power, and any challenges to the Court about the unconstitutionality of the Bar and the Agency of the Supreme Court. I dont know how thy keep winning? Its almost like they control the litigation! OH, I misspoke, they do control the litigation!!