Complaint Review: Tricia Barratt - Tricia Meeks - Tricia Hayes - Asan Nationwide

Guam Court Calendar:
SUKOLA, ANITA A. CF0241-08 10/29/2010 9:00 AM PEOPLE VS. TRICIA L. BARRATT
CONTINUED PRE TRIAL CONFERENCE ATTY GEN,, | TORRES,P

Warrant of Arrest Issued by Hon: Anita Sukola



Guam A.G. 1 671 475-3406

Please allow me to retort!

The original poster has once again falsely stated information pertaining to this case. The information about bankruptcy is false. All active legal proceedings and outstanding lawsuits have to be reported by law, but furthermore no monetary amounts are listed for the Barratts pertaining to this situation. For further information or how to obtain copies of the documents for the proceedings you can contact the law offices of Lewis and Journovoy in Pensacola, Florida or file for copies with the courthouse.

There are no credit cards in question with Mr. Barratts name on them.

Mr. Barratts auto account does not posses any funds from the accusers account. You can verify this information by comparing the statements from the auto loan accounts and the information submitted into the discovery. The auto loan accounts and credit card account statements were not included during indictment proceedings. Please note that the discovery package has failed to include copies of the auto loan accounts and the credit card account (these are payment history reports) in question to date, ironically.

Just as irony plays a big part in this case, so does the fact that the accuser is owed thousands of dollars from the Government of Guam. The accuser also has direct ties to government officials through funding for their campaigns.

Mr. Barratt was cleared from association with this case in May of 2008. This information can be obtained (not gotten) in the discovery package.

The original questions asked, are still not answered:

*Name of Employer

*Relationship to Employer

Im sure a civil issue of this magnitude if not worth the health/life of a person, no? Would you like to explain as to why Mrs. Barratt has not been at the jest of the trial settings? I'm sure that since you have been so cavalier about giving out information that you would like to let everyone know the full spectrum of the situation the Barratt family has had to deal with.

What does Mrs. Barratts illness/health issue and defending herself have to do with claiming something on a bankruptcy? Ive failed to make the connection. Can you please explain further?

Anonymity should be carried out all the way around, yet you disclose information about a case that is not your place to do so and/or thats not valid.

Indicted for Felony Theft. She's failed to appear to over 16 trial settings so there has been discussion of charging her husband (Timothy Barratt) since the alledged theft paid for her husband's car and credit card loans. Now she claims to her public defender that she is in too ill health to defend herself yet she claimed the alleged theft in her bankrupcy filing in March 2009.

Other information can be gotten by contacting the Guam Attorney General, Guam PD, Guam Navy NCIS, or the Guam FBI with the case#s and ph#s listed above.

Poster, Can you please provide further information on this situation?

Information I would like to have is:

*What are the official charges?

*What is the status of this almost two year old case?

*What was the final ruling and consequences?

*What relation does ALLEGED victim or Tricia have to poster?

*Can you please post the name of the employer?

Thank you.

If anyone has the current location of Tricia or email address please contact me Thanks, David Meeks ex-husband

Thank you to the people that let me know about this posting! Your time, thoughts, and comments are appreciated. I will not comment on the specifics of anything at this time, as I was advised not to by my attorney. Once this is all said and done, then I will do so. However, I would like to follow up on the comments made by the author and Jay. Jay did send an email asking for more information, as I was BCC'd on this email. As for whether or not he has received a response, he has not told me otherwise. And Jay HAS seen the discovery paperwork, and the information HAS been made available to him by me, Tricia Barratt. By law(Dd check the paperwork!) Jay is not allowed to contact the employer, because he is considered a(my) third party. As for the comments on "past close acquaintances" contacting the former employer or stating that I am questionable in character, I am not sure that this would be something even worth taking seriously. However, who am I to say this did not happen. I am sure my ex husband and his (mom's side)family would have choice words for me, but the feeling is mutual, and isn't that common? Also, anyone that knows me ...knows I have a very small tight circle of friends that I choose to talk to and/or associate with, and with that being said, I welcome the author of this posting to give details on who they talked to that is/was "close" to me. So, if anyone is in need of verifying information or my character, please contact me and I will give you names of previous employers, friends, family, professionals, and public officials that will verify my character. On a side note, it stated I sought employment in the accounting department of this business? Hmmmm....they had an accounting department? I guess I missed that one.

Lies, lies, lies: I contacted [email protected] and this post is a total lie. Lie#1.They never contacted this poster or the company. Today is May 4th and their post is May 1st. Lie#2.Many past acquaintances have been in contact with the company she alleged stole from and her character is questionable according to some past close acquaintances. Lie#3..This friend of hers can not get copies of all court records as this is a Criminal Felony and has privy information such as ss#, DOB, and other very personal information. It would need to be gotten by an attorney.. not a person stating they know her both professionally and personally. Lie#4.. The owner of the company that had the checks were allegedly stolen from (and bank transfer made from his business account) has no history of many malicious attacks on former employees or is law suit happy. Her conviction will only give her previous employer restitution.. not profit. Lie#5. This is not fabricated. This can be confirmed by contact the Guam Attorney General at 671 475-3406 and referring to Criminal Felony Case # 0241-08." Also, Guam Police Dept. case# 08-06717 (671 649-6330). Also, Navy Criminal Investigated Services (NCIS), Special Agent Robert Vogt at [email protected] Lie#6Nice try Jay.. I mean Tricia

It is my experience with Mrs. Barratt that there has to be some sort of mistake or false allegation in reference to this situation, posting, and the following circumstances. Knowing this person both professionally and personally, this is not in her character. This can be confirmed with anyone that knows her both personally or professionally. Her history speaks for itself. After contacting the person that posted this statement for more information, no response has been made. Also, when questioning the relationship of the person making the statement with reference to Mrs. Barratt, they have still failed to reply. In obtaining copies of all court records I have found that some of the information not only looks fabricated, but questionable with time lines and facts. The accuser has history of many malicious attacks on former employees, and as history shows, it appears this is a lawsuit happy person.

It is my experience with Mrs. Barratt that there has to be some sort of mistake or false allegation in reference to this situation, posting, and the following circumstances. Knowing this person both professionally and personally, this is not in her character. This can be confirmed with anyone that knows her both personally or professionally. Her history speaks for itself. After contacting the person that posted this statement for more information, no response has been made. Also, when questioning the relationship of the person making the statement with reference to Mrs. Barratt, they have still failed to reply. In obtaining copies of all court records I have found that some of the information not only looks fabricated, but questionable with time lines and facts. The accuser has history of many malicious attacks on former employees, and as history shows, it appears this is a lawsuit happy person.

It is my experience with Mrs. Barratt that there has to be some sort of mistake or false allegation in reference to this situation, posting, and the following circumstances. Knowing this person both professionally and personally, this is not in her character. This can be confirmed with anyone that knows her both personally or professionally. Her history speaks for itself. After contacting the person that posted this statement for more information, no response has been made. Also, when questioning the relationship of the person making the statement with reference to Mrs. Barratt, they have still failed to reply. In obtaining copies of all court records I have found that some of the information not only looks fabricated, but questionable with time lines and facts. The accuser has history of many malicious attacks on former employees, and as history shows, it appears this is a lawsuit happy person.

It is my experience with Mrs. Barratt that there has to be some sort of mistake or false allegation in reference to this situation, posting, and the following circumstances. Knowing this person both professionally and personally, this is not in her character. This can be confirmed with anyone that knows her both personally or professionally. Her history speaks for itself. After contacting the person that posted this statement for more information, no response has been made. Also, when questioning the relationship of the person making the statement with reference to Mrs. Barratt, they have still failed to reply. In obtaining copies of all court records I have found that some of the information not only looks fabricated, but questionable with time lines and facts. The accuser has history of many malicious attacks on former employees, and as history shows, it appears this is a lawsuit happy person.