Mike
Radford,#2Consumer Suggestion
Tue, September 06, 2005
Calculating exactly, the APR in the first case would've been 40.5% and with the $349 payment it's 36%. I suspect though the amount financed was much more than the $10,198 you'd expect due to the addition of thousands of bogus "back end" products. Then the APR is lower but it is an even worse deal because you are still paying $30,000 for a $13,000 car, and even if you wanted to pay it off tomorrow it would cost much more than $13,000. Payments on a new Civic, if you finance $13,000 with good credit (6% APR) should be around $250 for 60 months or $300 for 48 months. If you need a 72 month loan to get payments where you can afford them, you're buying too much car.
Paul
Anaheim,#3Consumer Suggestion
Tue, September 06, 2005
Even without knowing the interest rate, that is a bad, bad deal. You'd be borrowing $10,000 and repaying $30,000. According to the rule of 72s, the principal will double in the result of dividing 72 by your interest rate. Let's say a typical 10% rate. That means the principal will double in 7 years, which is the term of the loan. If you were paying 10% interest, you'd repay only $20,000 in 7 years. In this case, it's $30,000 so you'd be around 18% for your interest rate. I'll be honest with you, I'd take the money you planned to put down and buy a '92 CRX and put my own CD player in it. The air probably won't blow cold anymore, but summer's almost over anyway. Look at all the gas you'd save. Not to mention all the money you wouldn't have to throw away in interest.