Kevin the Miner from Ester
fairbanks,ak,#2General Comment
Wed, February 26, 2014
I see they are at it again they are verry Active they go on line and make fun of us and Chase us around on the internet They are the Fruity Pebbles not us Yes this Fairbanks Court is a Fraud and Ive been through it also so what ever that man is saying is probubly the Truth the Court is a Fraud full of Criminals Making Fun of us when we try to Explain their Oporational Tacticts, they are Murderers and Thuggs So keep it Flowing Fairbanks we need all of you to Wake up Now Please they are getting Verry good at this Horse Crap Thanks and Boo you evel AST DA,s and Criminal Judges BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
Glenn
North Pole,#3Author of original report
Thu, March 08, 2012
That the time stamps could not be correct and therefore altered and even not an exact copy 34 seconds is not several minutes and the "recording", even falsified has the magistrate recieving the exhibits in about 15 seconds ( as I presented to Judge Lyle at oral arguement on tape recorder). It was an oversight on her part during editing (nothing forged is perfect) or she figured I was too stupid to catch it and she figured people like YOU would say I was crazy without proper investigation. It must have took a lot of work to do what she did many hours to get it as right as possible and she was tired and at some point good enough was good enough, he'll never catch it. You apparently want to read the transcript to say"nothing wrong here" Who are you? The copy I showed doesn't say "Not a verbatim transcript" It was cut off by the copier. NIkole? Clerk Miller? Only someone associated with courts would know that. Of course the transcript is not verbatim, it cannot show the defendant and plaintiff on the "same channel" of the recording. It cannot show the security feature of the "Duration Range Indicator". It can however show things didn't happen as transcribed.
Elf
ROGERS,#4General Comment
Thu, March 08, 2012
I can only post a small picture on this website. If you are asking to read the whole transcript I could not do it nor would it serve any purpose because it was FALSIFIED.
You want me to read the transcript, but then claim you can't provide it and wouldn't anyway since, according to you, it's falsified.
Why tell me to read it if, as you are now claiming, it's worthless?
BTW, anyone with an interest can see the full size scan. With a PC and Chrome one only needs to right click on the image, then select open image in a new window. It's likely the same with Firefox. This is how I was able to see that you skipped the number 6 on your numbering.
Another thing, it clearly states the transcript is not a verbatim copy. It states "Refer to audio recording." See attached screen cap.
This destroys your claim of falsification, since whomever complied the transcript openly admits it's not verbatim and that the recording needs to be consulted for a more accurate record of what was said, and by whom. It's really hard to hold a position that it was falsified when it's clearly not intended to be a verbatim record.
Glenn
North Pole,#5Author of original report
Thu, March 08, 2012
I can only post a small picture on this website. If you are asking to read the whole transcript I could not do it nor would it serve any purpose because it was FALSIFIED. The only place I had hard proof positive that the record had been falsified that I could present in a motion without using a computer and For the Record playback software was right here and I will show the first page because perhaps all you see is the small picture and its hard to read the transcript (Premarked exhibits and time stamps) in the small pic I gave. The magistrate rerecorded the proceeding and she or someone thumped away on one of those court reporting machines for sound effect. I provided affidavits from both the defendant and her witness saying certain testimony took place in court. That testimony and more was erased and is not on the recording or transcrpt. I asked the PI to concentrate on that testimony(barking dogs) because it was the most memorable and we didn't want to complicate things too much for the scattered defendant. So we kept it simple figuring proving one deletion should beg investigation of the others.
The state uses For the Record software to record the proceeding. There is a 4 second difference between the range duration indicator and the actual elapsed time. Right after the break you can watch the 4 seconds tic away in 1 like the last 10 seconds of a basketball game where they do 100ths of a second. This happens as we went back on record supposedly. Also both the defendant and me the plaintiff are presented on the same channel #2(there should be at least 3 channels- 4 with a jury). I don't know if it was recorded that way. I know it would be easiest to rerecord that way. Either way For the Record lists those 2 features as "security" features and both are compromised. Judge Lyle denied the 4 seconds even though its there plain to see and he ignored the channel, never mentioned it. This is the same Judge Lyle who could have asked the defendant at oral aguement if what I was saying was true but he did not. He could of asked her about the affidavits but he did not. He could have asked why she had 2 replies to my brief after having missed the deadline for filing the first 2 show up one scibbled in her scribble and the other prepared by the Nikole Schick fan club claiming to have heard the proceeding even though I was the only purchaser of a tape on record. He did not. There were witnesses. My exwife and a neighbor I had never met till this, who had problems with the defendant on the other side. I chose not to have them provide affidavits for the appeal because I didn't want to hang targets on their backs. I opted to hire a private investigator to interview the defendant instead. But those 2 still remember what was said. Also, Judge Lyle had a legal duty to "put the record straight" if it had been corrupted. He chose not to even entertain that, despite my motion. If this was such a small insignificant thing why didn't he do his legal duty? I'm not complaining I didn't win, I'm complaining I didn't get a fair trial. The fact that Records were falsified in any degree and /or preparing for my arrival by inviting a mediator when there is no formal mediation program should be sufficient to illustrate things were not "regular or usual." Recently the state has approached the other guy who said Magistrate Schick tampered with evidence and offered to lower his $11,000 to $1,000 but he would have to admit guilt. He told them to take a leap. I didn't think a court ordered judgement could be amended without COURT!
Elf
ROGERS,#6General Comment
Thu, March 08, 2012
You whined about the numbering, then when I point out the most plausible reason for the numbering based on evidence you provided, you whine some more.
If you want me, or anyone else, to read the transcript, make it available. A picture that shows you didn't number your evidence correctly doesn't do anything but prove you didn't number your evidence correctly. Nothing more.
Glenn
North Pole,#7Author of original report
Wed, March 07, 2012
If the actual events of the case do not reconcile with the record then it has been altered. Just the fact that record has been altered should in itself be evidence of an unfair trial as the definition of fair is "usual or regular". But for small minded fools who like to blame victims instead of perps I'll tell you item #4 was an original property survey with affixed raised stamp. I asked it not be labled and the court got a copy instead of the original(their copy was numbered) and #9 was not used , I told her I did not know if I would use it and it was merely an illustration by my own hand so it was left un-numbered and eventually unused. Look at the transcript and see the exhibit list or are you so determined to find fault with me that like them real evidence doesn't matter only who you want to win.
Elf
ROGERS,#8General Comment
Wed, March 07, 2012
I note in the picture you provide that your blue colored numbers go from 5 to 7. The red shows 5, then something (probably a 6) then 7.
You completely skipped number 6.
That the clerk, or whomever, put the correct number sequence on the pages can't, to the rational mind, be seen as evidence of anything wrong. How long it took the clerk to put the proper number sequence on the pages also doesn't matter. Be it 34 seconds, 15 seconds or five minutes. It's of no matter.
One reasonably prudent person would see the clerk's correcting your numbering error as evidence of anything other than the clerk ensuring your evidence is documented properly. This flies in the face of your conspiracy claim.
Glenn
North Pole,#9Author of original report
Wed, March 07, 2012
Here is the first page of the court transcripts. Note 34 seconds from being called forward till the magistrate recieving the exhibits. Also pictured are my working copies of the the court exhibits with the clerks writing in the thin red marker over my blue pen. I followed along with her in blue pen as she affixed the court stickers and numbered the exhibits. Then because my numers didn't match hers she took them and numbered them then took the courts copies to the magistrate. Not 34 seconds as the transcrpt shows or 15 seconds as the recording has but 3 or 4 minutes perhaps 5 minutes. Its not humanly possible to tear off and affix 9 stickers and number them in 34 seconds or even close to it and there were witnesses. So let me get this straight there has never been a conspiracy in America? That anyone who thinks a few people may be out to get them wears tin foil hat? You are either one of them or very naive probably the former.
Ken
Colorado,#10Consumer Comment
Sun, March 04, 2012
that cold air has really affected you.
Let's see, the electric company is against you, the assistant attorney took up their cause due to the "fact" they worked for said electrical company. Your neighbor tied her dog(s) to your tree and got away with it because her daughter worked for Allstate, who paid them from your policy.
Then the mediator and judge conspired against you and had illegal converstaions.
Then the clerk altered the recording of the proceedings and further horrified you.
Magistrate Harbinson then retaliated against you for previous complaints about her contact.
THEN, a "federal agent" tried to provoke a fight with you at the airport.
How long have you been ducking those black helicopters buzzing overhead?
You are certifiable and should be seeking capable medical intervention ASAP.
To put it plainly....YOU'RE NUTS!!!
Glenn
North Pole,#11Author of original report
Sun, March 04, 2012
It appearsd like them you see nothing wrong with altering evidence and ruining citizens. The prepaid meters certainly have something to do with it. These people were in waiting for me and I'm fortunate enough they were stupid enough( or arrogant enough) to get me when I had little at stake. Had I been being sued it could have been much worse. You are also wrong because Alaska law has a specific law for trespass by girdling trees and tying dogs is a classic example and they extend the claim period to 6 years because it takes nso long for damage to manifest itself. What are you saying I'm not entitled to the protections of the law?
Elf
ROGERS,#12General Comment
Sun, March 04, 2012
A tree of yours fell onto your neighbor's car. These things can happen. You should have let your insurance company deal with it. Filing a counter suit because your neighbor had, in the past, tied her dog to the same tree is what got you into trouble. Pre-paid electrical meters don't even factor into it.