On June 1, 1991, Chuck was indicted for selling and hooking up descrambler cable boxes to TV cable customers. The boxes allowed the customers to receive premium movie channels from the Cable companies without having to pay for them. Gilson/Rodrick sold and hooked up the equipment on May 2, 1991, to undercover police officers for $350 .00, lol how stupid can you get. Oh by the way everyone, his name of conviction back then was CHARLES GILSON. He changed his name to Chuck Rodrick in 1993.
Chuck told investigators that he had been told by United Artists Cables ‘ Attorney, and the head of the Arizona Cable Television Corporation, that his cable boxes were legal (WOW Chuck, sounds like defamation and trade libel to me). He was sent to the Maricopa County Jail on June 6, 1991 , for selling an instrument with Intent to defraud, a class 6 felony, and fraudulent schemes, a class 2 felony. Ooops! This is the same good old Chuck that thinks because we have a felony like he does, and that he is ripping people off with his web site that he is smarter than us. Think again,, he does not have an education whatsoever, he lives off Brent Oesterblad running criminal enterprises.
Chuck was adopted and did not grow up in a normal functional environment. His adoptive parents were physically abusive and he was sent to a reform school at the age of 9 through 13. He learned of and met his natural father when he was eighteen and maintained regular contact with him and his natural sister before he was sentenced for the cable box crime. I see why he is so screwed up in the head and has a vendetta against felons because he was adopted for some odd ball reason, probably because his real parents left him and then he had the nerve to speak with his father after that? What the hell is wrong with this guy? Oh I am sure you all can answer that for yourselves. Now because he left home at an early age, he did NOT graduate from high school, and has never felt that he ha s needed a high school diploma . I see why he does not work a legitimate job, because all he knows is abuse, and fraud. The story on that past is really drawn out and boring, we will now show his other schemes.
Complaint To Recover Prepetition Payments To Ponzi Scheme
Investors. Amount of Demand: $41,000 [96-4601] F95-00897-474-
HAR Larry D. Compton vs. Charles Rodrick . NOS 454 Recover
Money/Property . [ Filing Fee $ 120 Receipt # 48791] With
attachments. [Mario,G.] (Entered: 12/18/1996
Then in 1997 he faced a Trademark infringement suit. The Alaska Ponzi Scheme was the big one and he may still owe on that judgment. s**t, he has NOT filed taxes in over seven years. What does that tell you?? He was ordered to pay over $45,000 in the Alaska ordeal.