- Report: #219204
Complaint Review: Gary Jezorski - Vertical Marketing - Currency Exchange Profits - Vernon Hills Illinois
-
Author Confirmed
Why?
Gary Jezorski - Vertical Marketing - Currency Exchange Profits
1561 N. Cypress Pointe Drive Ste 300 Vernon Hills, 60061 Illinois, U.S.A.
Web:
N/A
Categories:
Business Rating:
(0)
Tell us has your experience with this business or person been good?
Gary Jezorski - Vertical Marketing - Currency Exchange Profits Fraudulent claims, no refund, completely unresponsive to refund and support requests. Vernon Hills Illinois
On 8/6/06 I purchased the CurrencyExchangeProfits system, and per the instructions set up, funded, and started trading in the DXInOne system. Within days I discovered his promised profits of 1-5% per day we're simply false. Further, the screenshot on his sales page, as anyone trading e-currency knows, claims his profits as though it were 3% per day, instead of accurately stating that it's a cumulate total shown, which amounts to about .06% daily profits.
Seeing this, I called their support line to get my refund. Miraculously, a person answered and I was told to enter a ticket for the refund, which I did WELL within the 45 days stated in the refund policy. I regret not demanding a refund on the phone because since that call I have NEVER gotten a live person to answer. And I have called their 2 other numbers (I presume the offices of Vertical Marketing), still to get only voicemail. None of the voicemails I have left were ever responded to. I did enter a ticket for the refund request, but of course it was never acknowledged or responded to.
I have followed everything to the letter and there is no "loophole" that could possibly get them out of refunding my money, yet it appears they will not be honoring their agreement to do so. Nevertheless, I would expect any rebuttal they may make to my posting here to do just that: find a loophole. That seems to be what others in my shoes are getting from them. I would be ecstatic just to get my $249 back, let alone the "double-my-money" back that his refund promise claims.
Please avoid Gary Jezorski and any of his Internet Marketing schemes, as I have found them to be a very disreputable company to work with.
Burt
Ventura, California
U.S.A.
Seeing this, I called their support line to get my refund. Miraculously, a person answered and I was told to enter a ticket for the refund, which I did WELL within the 45 days stated in the refund policy. I regret not demanding a refund on the phone because since that call I have NEVER gotten a live person to answer. And I have called their 2 other numbers (I presume the offices of Vertical Marketing), still to get only voicemail. None of the voicemails I have left were ever responded to. I did enter a ticket for the refund request, but of course it was never acknowledged or responded to.
I have followed everything to the letter and there is no "loophole" that could possibly get them out of refunding my money, yet it appears they will not be honoring their agreement to do so. Nevertheless, I would expect any rebuttal they may make to my posting here to do just that: find a loophole. That seems to be what others in my shoes are getting from them. I would be ecstatic just to get my $249 back, let alone the "double-my-money" back that his refund promise claims.
Please avoid Gary Jezorski and any of his Internet Marketing schemes, as I have found them to be a very disreputable company to work with.
Burt
Ventura, California
U.S.A.
1 Updates & Rebuttals
James
Provo,Utah,
U.S.A.
I don't understand. Please clarify.
#2Consumer Comment
Thu, March 15, 2007
I've never used this program, but I'm curious. I read your comments about the screenshot of his profits record, so I looked at the screenshot again. These are the approximate numbers listed in the chart (not exact): Session 21 total costs 15,280 total return 15,890 total profit 610 (3.99%) Session 20 total costs 14,898 total return 15,438 total profit 539 (3.6%) Session 19 total costs 14,589 total return 15,106 total profit 517 (3.5%) (The chart continues on similarly for the 7 more sessions) The math seems to me to work out just fine. 15890-15280=610 610/15280=0.0399=3.99% If each session is one day, then that looks to me like a daily profit of 3%. It doesn't look like it could possibly be referring to a cumulative profit, especially considering the fact that the profit percentages listed for some of the sessions are actually a little bit LOWER than those of preceding sessions. (session 15: 2.8%, session 14: 3.3%) Can you explain your accusation more thoroughly for those of us who aren't very knowledgable about these things? Or if you think you may have just made a mistake, that's fine too. Just let us know. Thanks.
