Larry
West Sacramento,#2Consumer Suggestion
Fri, January 19, 2007
You are learning an expensive lesson. First, coverage under an auto insurance policy can be complicated. The policy was not yours. You called Geico to see if you were covered, but you imply that you did not tell the representative the whole story, as you note that they failed to ask you the right questions. You make it sound like it was their job to pry the facts out of you. So I am having a problem seeing how Geico ripped you off by denying coverage to someone who was not a policy holder in the first place. Your mom apparently added you as a driver to her policy to protect herself from liability when you drive her car. Second, even if Geico would have covered you, you would still have to pay out of your pocket for damage to the rental car. Yeah, Geico would have paid for some of the damage, but they are not going to pay the jacked price that Alamo will charge for the repairs or the the loss-of-use charges while the car is in the shop. The rental contract allows Alamo to charge whatever they wish for the repairs and to charge you because they are losing money while the car is out of service. Even though it is a major rip off, always buy the rental car insurance. Technically, it is a damage waiver. It's an agreement that in exchange for the extra fee they will not make you pay for damage. When you rent a car you are responsible for all damage to it, even if the cause of the damage was not your fault. The damage waiver lets you walk away from nearly all damage without being hassled.