Anonymous
Livonia,#2Consumer Suggestion
Tue, January 24, 2006
Alyssa first indicated: "I was unsure about the paternity of my unborn child" . Upon being tested, and being told that the "father" was an exclusion, Alyssa indicated "This was unbelievable to me because the only other possibility had had a vasectomy" . So, if the only other possibility had had a vasectomy, why would Alyssa have been unsure about the paternity of a child? And if she was unsure about the paternity, why would she claim it was unbelievable that the "father" was an exclusion? I point this out so that consumers reading this forum will understand the complaint is obviously misdirected, there is no evidence of a scam, there is a woman caught off-guard / embarrassed by the results of a paternity test AND re-confirmation test.
Anonymous
Livonia,#3Consumer Suggestion
Tue, January 24, 2006
Alyssa first indicated: "I was unsure about the paternity of my unborn child" . Upon being tested, and being told that the "father" was an exclusion, Alyssa indicated "This was unbelievable to me because the only other possibility had had a vasectomy" . So, if the only other possibility had had a vasectomy, why would Alyssa have been unsure about the paternity of a child? And if she was unsure about the paternity, why would she claim it was unbelievable that the "father" was an exclusion? I point this out so that consumers reading this forum will understand the complaint is obviously misdirected, there is no evidence of a scam, there is a woman caught off-guard / embarrassed by the results of a paternity test AND re-confirmation test.
Anonymous
Livonia,#4Consumer Suggestion
Tue, January 24, 2006
Alyssa first indicated: "I was unsure about the paternity of my unborn child" . Upon being tested, and being told that the "father" was an exclusion, Alyssa indicated "This was unbelievable to me because the only other possibility had had a vasectomy" . So, if the only other possibility had had a vasectomy, why would Alyssa have been unsure about the paternity of a child? And if she was unsure about the paternity, why would she claim it was unbelievable that the "father" was an exclusion? I point this out so that consumers reading this forum will understand the complaint is obviously misdirected, there is no evidence of a scam, there is a woman caught off-guard / embarrassed by the results of a paternity test AND re-confirmation test.
Anonymous
Livonia,#5Consumer Suggestion
Tue, January 24, 2006
Alyssa first indicated: "I was unsure about the paternity of my unborn child" . Upon being tested, and being told that the "father" was an exclusion, Alyssa indicated "This was unbelievable to me because the only other possibility had had a vasectomy" . So, if the only other possibility had had a vasectomy, why would Alyssa have been unsure about the paternity of a child? And if she was unsure about the paternity, why would she claim it was unbelievable that the "father" was an exclusion? I point this out so that consumers reading this forum will understand the complaint is obviously misdirected, there is no evidence of a scam, there is a woman caught off-guard / embarrassed by the results of a paternity test AND re-confirmation test.