Kristina
Akron,#2Consumer Comment
Mon, March 19, 2007
Are you saying that John from New Jersey is a Key West cop who is married to Ashley from Florida? Are you accusing this because they disagreed with you? I don't believe that for one second. Here is my .02. I feel for Mr. Mcarthy. It sounds like he is an innocent vicitm here. Well, he got his money back, but was still victim for his time and effort. However, what's the deal with Krutko? I'm assuming this report was written by Krutko based on the abusive language. But when you go in arrears for non-payment and a boat is held as collateral, what do you expect? There is no crime in that if the hotel was claiming some sort of right to the property. A contract, written or verbal between landlord and tenant, is a civil matter. Bottom line. Depriving someone benefit from a property is not always criminal, but civil like in this case. It is up to the two parties to settle in court, not for the police to start throwing people in jail. I applaud the police in this case. In my town, they would have thrown both parties in jail and let the inmates be judge and jury. I'm siding with the rebuttals here. This sounds like a screw-up on Krutko's part.
Ashley
Cudjoe Key,#3Consumer Comment
Mon, March 19, 2007
Let me first state this. I am not married to a cop. In fact, I am not married at all. That's all I'll say about my personal life, which has nothing to do with this report. Second, your words speak for themselves and show your nature. Nothing more needs to be said.
Robert
columbus,#4Author of original report
Mon, March 19, 2007
As anyone can read your full of *&*&. First of all everyone theres a federal lawsuit against the hotel by me for theft (case # 07-60001) maimi florida. Second it was appraised at 160-200k before i bought it. third anyone cas see you have no idea what your talking about and yes this is ashleys husband who i know. as he stated everyone about not taking hotel to court look up the case its in miami federal court youll see he doesnt have a clue what hes saying. point proven....
Robert
columbus,#5Author of original report
Mon, March 19, 2007
As anyone can read your full of *&*&. First of all everyone theres a federal lawsuit against the hotel by me for theft (case # 07-60001) maimi florida. Second it was appraised at 160-200k before i bought it. third anyone cas see you have no idea what your talking about and yes this is ashleys husband who i know. as he stated everyone about not taking hotel to court look up the case its in miami federal court youll see he doesnt have a clue what hes saying. point proven....
Robert
columbus,#6Author of original report
Mon, March 19, 2007
As anyone can read your full of *&*&. First of all everyone theres a federal lawsuit against the hotel by me for theft (case # 07-60001) maimi florida. Second it was appraised at 160-200k before i bought it. third anyone cas see you have no idea what your talking about and yes this is ashleys husband who i know. as he stated everyone about not taking hotel to court look up the case its in miami federal court youll see he doesnt have a clue what hes saying. point proven....
John
Califon,#7Consumer Comment
Sun, March 18, 2007
and have to agree with her. This "yacht" went from $100,000 to $200,000 to $160,000 and back to now $200,000 again. Aside from the fact that the alleged buyer supposedly dropped $20,000 in the thing just to get a scant amount of miles before it broke down again. Even one of your posted newspaper articles states it's only a "catamaran". If anything, you tried to rip off the guy who bought it as you wanted $30,000 more than the hotel allegedly did plus he had to drop cash into something that was alleged to have been seaworthy. I have no doubt that the boat was abandon and fees not paid that were required and this is why no one will touch this as well as the fact that you do not feel strongly enough in your convictions to even attempt to take this hotel to court.
Robert
columbus,#8Author of original report
Sun, March 18, 2007
first pf all i was cooperative until the local police decided to leave my $200,000 boat in the thieves possession. and as far as posting all over the internet you better believe it when this goes to trial i want everyone to know who stole the yacht and which police did nothing about it. You can run your mouth all day long the federal judge will say whos right. then what will your excuse be? and you know anyone reading this knows the sheriffs in key west screwed up royally and it will all come out. everyone also knows after the police went and saw it in the thieves possession this was just a couple hours after taking boat they already started dismantleing boat and the smart cop still left it there. And everyone reading this go look at all my other posts this laurie or whoever shes claiming to be this time is the wife of the idiot cop that let the thieves keep my yacht. She used 20 other names in forums but says the same stupid stuff. and yes please keep replying to my posts all your doing is moving my story further up the search engine pages thanks Robert
Ashley
Cudjoe Key,#9Consumer Comment
Sun, March 18, 2007
Unfortunately, the sender of this Rip-off report has not been completely honest. In all fairness to the parties involved, I have to speak up on this topic. When Mr. Cretko first filed a police report, he was very demanding, beligerant, and uncooperative with the agency at hand, the Monroe County Sheriff's Office. An investigation was started by the agency. When a deputy called Mr. Cretko to update him on the case, the deputy informed him that this was possibly a civil matter based on claims made by the hotel who repo'd the boat. At that point, Mr. Cretko became what's known as an "uncooperative victim." He refused to cooperate with the investigation, so the deputies dropped the case and referred him to the State's Attorney's Office. When Mr. Cretko contacted the SAO, they determined the case was civil in nature and could not be prosecuted criminally. This information was found by me in Monroe County public records. Since then, Mr. Cretko has flooded internet forums with this inaccurate story. Each time, the story changes a little. By the way, this "yacht" is nothing more than a catamaran dive-boat. It does not meet the definition of a yacht. My very simple recommendation to this problem is simply to cooperate with authorities when filing this sort of claim. Common sense will tell you that they have to do a thorough investigation and get both sides of the story before taking action.