;
  • Report:  #567180

Complaint Review: HBW Supply Inc - Hemet California

Reported By:
Rosemary - Bournemouth, Other, United Kingdom
Submitted:
Updated:

HBW Supply Inc
490 East Menlo [Mento?] Avenue Hemet, CA92543 California, United States of America
Phone:
951 487 6496
Web:
www.buyacupuncture.com
Categories:
Tell us has your experience with this business or person been good? What's this?

I am a health Therapist using, among other modalities, magnetic pulse.

I searched using Google for magnetic therapy and electro-magnetic therapy devices.

HBW was 1 of the companies listed and researched. The online listing stated their KWD 808 as having magnetic pulse options and magnets were included in the listing of accessories included in the package. I printed off [luckily] that description.

There were further emails to the point that I was happy the KWD 808 wouold fulfill my needs.  The device has a variety of acupuncture applications but these were secondary to the magnetic pulse and only for my own personal use.

When it arrived it was obvious immediately that no magnets were supplied, 0nly 2 pairs of pads rather that the 10 or 12 listed. It became obvious too that there was NO magnetic pulse facility. The device was tested for such and anyway without magnets this waveform would not penetrate the tissues.

I raised this with the company, as to the magnets-these were with an older device(?),the number of pads now limited-no comments, and no mention at all of the magnetic pulse option. Sami Woo also requested that I state where I saw this info.

I emailed him the web pages, which had already been "updated" and also copy of the previous web pages.

They are now offering $7 discount! Can not exchange/refund as postal charges too high! WHAT! Yet they expect me to pay these charges + customs fees. They say they are sorry.

the only use I have for the device is for TENS on myself [I buy TENS @ 4$] and for very occasional electro-acupuncture for friends.  IE No fees charged to reimburse my outlay.

 



4 Updates & Rebuttals

SamiWoo

hemet,
California,
United States of America
Rosemary Clarke is a incorrect reportor... Just like return

#2REBUTTAL Individual responds

Thu, March 18, 2010

   On January 28th 2010 Rosemary Clark from UK ordered a Great Wall brand acupuncture, electrotherapy unit, KWD-808 in an online order totaling $144.00.

   Because of import/export restrictions on Chinese manufactured magnetic products beginning in 2009 magnetic accessories were no longer included in these US sold models. Unfortunately the product description was not updated on our website and we admit that this is our mistake. Despite our companys policy of not guaranteeing or providing refunds of fees related to international orders (of which Ms. Clark was made aware of in writing previous to ordering) because of variations in requirements of other countries related to the types of products we sell, we have made an exception in order to settle this matter.

   On February 8th 2010, Rosemary emailed us describing here situation. On February 12th we began to discuss, through emails with Rosemary, how to resolve the problem. We offered Rosemary three options:

   1) Because of the lack of magnetic features we offered a discount of $21.76 to compensate for this fault, not a refund of $7.00 which Ms. Clarke incorrectly stated in her report.

   2) We offered to order the magnetic accessories from the manufacturer and have them shipped to her at no charge ( if she keeps say looking for the magnetic therapy machine.. why not accept this option????)

   3) Rosemary could return the machine to us and we would provide a refund (original invoice charge + customs taxes and return freight charges) Totaling $214.26. In return we asked that she remove her Rip-off Report.

   Rosemary chose the third option. Prior to receiving her return we issued a credit of $72.10 to Ms. Clark via Paypal on 2/16/10. After this she inquired about possibly doing an exchange for 2 low frequency devices we sell. We said that we could even exchange for 3 devices but there would be absolutely no refunds of any fees, charges, etc. according to our return policy. She did not inquire further regarding an exchange and requested that we refund the remainder of her charges once we received the unit.

   On 2/26/10 we received her return via USPS and on 3/2/10 issued a refund of $118.50. Several of Rosemarys statements about dollar amounts of refunds are incorrect, (not she said "refunded 70 $ prior to this and then 97 $") Paypal charges fees on transactions this is beyond our control and we are subject to these fees also when we accept payments from customers. We were intending to withhold the final $23.66 due to be refunded until Ms. Clark followed through on her end of our agreement and remove her Rip-off Report, but in good faith we refunded the last $23.66 on 3/6/10.

It is now March 12th 2010 and Rosemary has not removed her report, we are disappointed that she has not fulfilled her promise, and we noticed her further stinging inaccurate report posted on 3/6/10 the same day she received her final installment of her full refund totaling $214.26.

I believe that we made every effort to rectify this issue and in no way have we attempted to commit any type of fraud. We have provided a complete refund to Ms. Rosemary Clark in accordance with our agreement. Weve tried do what we can, if she was still dissatisfied with our service, then there is nothing more we can do to please her. But, the other suppliers should be careful before considering whether to take this persons business.

Report Attachments

Rosemary

Bournemouth,
Internet,
United Kingdom
"Promise" to Repay all charges not kept. What a Surprise!

#3Author of original report

Sat, March 06, 2010

My thanks to the Rippoff Report for prompting HBW-Sami Woo to actually communicate with me again and agree to refund for the mis-described item.

This was returned and received back in California Friday 26 february.

I was refunded 70$ prior to this and then 97$ (approx0 when prompted for payment on Monday 1st March. I have reminded Sami Woo that he promised to refund ALL my charges, inclusive of Customs and handling charges of 40$ plus.

This is still outstanding. 

The Ripoffreport will remain and be added to until these charges are paid.

I note they are still advertising the KWD-808 does magnetic pulse, IT DOES NOT.

  


Rosemary

Bournemouth,
Internet,
United Kingdom
COMMUNICATION AGAIN!

#4Author of original report

Thu, February 18, 2010

THANK YOU RIPOFF REPORT!

HBW is now communicating again and has deposited some funds towards a refund for this product. 50% now and 50% when item received back.

HBW ask that I remove the Ripoff Report!

I do not yet trust that I will receive a FULL refund so the report will remain until I do, especially as I must now return the machine to California as an added expense.


Rosemary

Bournemouth,
Internet,
United Kingdom
NOW REFUSING REFUND AND IGNORING EMAILS

#5Author of original report

Wed, February 17, 2010

Further to my Ripoff Report about Sami Woo and HBW Supply Inc.

Sami Woo did say he would refund 50% of invoice to PayPay and then 50% when machine posted to an address he would give me.

He then got Pay Pal to "Decide" on outcome.

PayPal stated that `they were only responsible for the item getting to the customer".

Sami Woo now thinks he does not have to refund me.

I shall be contacting PayPal!

I have been advised to contact the Better Business Bureau.

I really need that money to purchase a genuine magnetic pulse machine.

How underhand are they!!! 

Reports & Rebuttal
Respond to this report!
Also a victim?
Repair Your Reputation!
//