;
  • Report:  #1292517

Complaint Review: Honorable Judge Michelle K. Palmer-Percy - Sturgis South Dakota

Reported By:
Dr. Staci Margheim - Gering , Nebraska, USA
Submitted:
Updated:

Honorable Judge Michelle K. Palmer-Percy
1425 Sherman Street Sturgis, 57785 South Dakota, USA
Phone:
6053474411
Web:
N/A
Tell us has your experience with this business or person been good? What's this?

This matter involves CIV 46SMC1100317.  This civil small claims suit was presented on August 30, 2011.  I presented the facts, evidence, and photos accordingly.  Refer to exhibits A., B., C., D., and E..  The defendant in this matter neglected his fiduciary responsibilities and under the penalty of perjury, lied in court.  Overwhelming evidence presented in this small claims suit should have been rendered in my favor.  There was no court reporter in this small claims civil matter.  In addition, the Judge slammed a book and stormed out of the court room in the middle of a small claims civil court proceeding.  The Judge rendered no final conclusion in this matter.  Under the Freedom of Information Act, I have requested in writing a copy of your final verdict on 3/4/2016 by fax.  In addition to this matter, this is in violation of the following:

1. South Dakota Law under 40-1, 2.3

2. South Dakota Law under 40-1. 2.4

3. South Dakota Law under 40-1, 14

4. South Dakota Law under 40-1, 27-which is a Class I Misdemeanor

5. Breach of Contract Law

6. Title 38, U. S. C., under section 701.  The first violation is a $55,000 fine for theft of property of a veteran.

7. EEOC violations regarding discrimination regarding a former member of the armed services regarding discrimination which is tiered in with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 2010 under Title II

8. Veterans with Disabilities Act of 2010

10.  South Dakota Law regarding theft.

11.  Civil Rights Act of 1964

12.  Dishonor of the court by storming out of the court room in the middle of a small claims civil suit court proceeding and rendering no final conclusion in this matter.

13.  South Dakota Codified Laws under Title 16, subsection 16-19-34 regarding deceit and collusion as grounds for disbarment---Treble damages.  The Treble damages are in the amount of 1890.09 at this juncture.  This initial small claims suit was initiated against the defendant in the amount of 630.03.

14. War Crimes Act of 1996

15. Genocide

The United States has signed the fourth Protocol confirmed by the ICRC.

Geneva Conventions of 1949 Protocols under the 4th Treaty regarding criminal repression are as follows:

  • Principle I-Any person who commits an act which constitutes a crime under international law is responsible therefor and liable to punishment.
  • Principle II-The fact that internal law does not impose a penalty for an act which constitutes a crime under international law does not relieve the person who committed an act from responsibility under international law.
  • Principle III-The fact that a person who committed an act which constitutes a crime under international law acted as Head of State or responsible Government Official does not relieve him or her from responsibility under International Law.
  • Principle IV-The fact that a person acted pursuant to order of his/her government or of a superior does not relieve him/her from responsibility under international law, provided that a moral choice was in fact possible to him/her.

I am seeking a restitution amount of 630.03 for failure to render a judgment with relevant facts and evidence presented in this small claims civil suit.  Thank you for your attention to this matter.

This information is true, accurate, and to the best of my knowledge with no intent to deceive the public at large.  This information is protected under U. C. C. 1-207 and 1-308.  These documents are not to be sold, distributed, or transferred to a third party without my expressed written consent.  This information is protected under Title 108 and 107 of the copyright and publishing laws.  Freedom of speech is secured under the Declaration of Human Rights under International Law.  All rights are reserved worldwide.



5 Updates & Rebuttals

Evidence Provided in Chronological Order by Exhibit(s)

#2Author of original report

Thu, March 24, 2016

This is the correct order of sequence starting with exhibits A., B., C., D., and E. These events are listed in correct order by exhibits A., B., C., D., and E.

Report Attachments

Documentation of evidence presented is not in order.

#3Author of original report

Thu, March 24, 2016

The reader needs to be informed that these documents presented are not in chronological order.  The CORRECT chronological order of events that took place are exhibits A., B., C., and D. accordingly.  These documents listed above are not in the correct order.  They are listed as exhibits D., C., B., and A. and this is not how these events unfolded.  Thank you for your attention to this matter.

In addition, the documents and evidence presented were sent by e-mail with no names listed as 3/24/2016. They are to be uploaded to this complaint in order. This also included a copy of the Judge's final verdict in this matter.  The Judge's final verdict is listed as exhibit E. I do have in my posession the original documents with the names of the individuals involved in this matter accordingly.


Exhibits presented are not in order.

#4Author of original report

Fri, March 11, 2016

UPDATE 3/10/2016:The reader needs to be aware that these exhibits presented are not in chronological order accordingly.  Please ensure that you read Exhibits A., B., C., D., in order.  Exhibit E., F., and G. is currently missing at this time.  I have requested that these documents be posted in order.  Thank you for attention to this detail.   This information presented is true, accurate, and to the best of my knowledge with no intent to deceive the public at large.  In addition, any reponse that is not rational and does not pertain strictly to this matter above will be ignored.


Here are the facts and evidence presented accordingly.

#5Author of original report

Thu, March 10, 2016

Please refer to the following exhibits A., B., C., D., and F.

Update: As of 3/10/2016, I received the Judge's final verdict in this matter by regular mail.

Report Attachments

Here are the facts and evidence to support this complaint.

#6Author of original report

Thu, March 10, 2016

Please refer to Exhibit A., B., C., D., E. and F.

Reports & Rebuttal
Respond to this report!
Also a victim?
Repair Your Reputation!
//