Victim Defense
Omaha,#2UPDATE EX-employee responds
Wed, February 06, 2008
The claims posted by SRP have been in the works with Mr. Ottis' general counsel, his intellectual properties counsel and SRP's attorney. No conclusions has been reached. The costumes pictured on the Internet in the SRP video are the sole property of the Globie company. The Adventures of Globie" title was copyrighted by Mr. Ottis at least three years prior to SRP obtainging a copyright on it which is being investigated. The story for the video was partially contributed by Mr. Ottis as were all of the characters. The library of Congress records verify that Mr. Ottis owned and still owns this name and all of the character images to all of the characters that appear in the video produced by SRP. Mr. Ottis is still in a relationship with an educational branch of NASA. There is obviously a bad relationship between these parties but, Mr. Ottis is out $43,000.00 plus significant incidental costs for the production and has ZERO to show for the money, and SRP is slamming him for using a ten second clip of footage ??
Victim Defense
Omaha,#3UPDATE EX-employee responds
Wed, February 06, 2008
The claims posted by SRP have been in the works with Mr. Ottis' general counsel, his intellectual properties counsel and SRP's attorney. No conclusions has been reached. The costumes pictured on the Internet in the SRP video are the sole property of the Globie company. The Adventures of Globie" title was copyrighted by Mr. Ottis at least three years prior to SRP obtainging a copyright on it which is being investigated. The story for the video was partially contributed by Mr. Ottis as were all of the characters. The library of Congress records verify that Mr. Ottis owned and still owns this name and all of the character images to all of the characters that appear in the video produced by SRP. Mr. Ottis is still in a relationship with an educational branch of NASA. There is obviously a bad relationship between these parties but, Mr. Ottis is out $43,000.00 plus significant incidental costs for the production and has ZERO to show for the money, and SRP is slamming him for using a ten second clip of footage ??