Marie
Grand Rapids,#2Author of original report
Sat, November 08, 2003
Just an update, the Chief Judge of Kent County acknowledged the injustice which occured in Judge Servaas's court, how this judge would not allow the tenant to speak, and interrupted the tenant, while also acknowledging the tenants repeated attempt to address Brookline Managment/Hidden Valley's failure to make repairs and "educate the court"!! This judge can no longer hear anythign with the case, Brookline and their crooked attorney have lost the appeal!! Fight these slumlords and protect innocent people from enduring the hazordous conditions they force people to live in. WZZM will be doing an update on the news. The people must speak for these injustices occurring. Our Consitiution, liberties, family and health are at risk. We are becoming a society where it is no longer "We the People" but "We the judges". Stay tough, be strong, and stand up for your rights. Some judges make their own laws instead of interpreting them, this Chief Judge followed the laws. Remember....the truth shall set you free and prevails.
Marie
Grand Rapids,#3Author of original report
Thu, April 03, 2003
The Judicial Code of Conduct 3 (C) states, " Disqualification. A judge should raise the issue of disqualification whenever the judge has cause to believe that grounds for disqualification may exist under MCR 2.003(B)" The listed Michigan Case Rule (MCR) states, "(B) Grounds. A judge is disqualified when the judge cannot impartially hear a case, including but not limited to instances in which:(1) The judge is personally biased or prejudiced for or against a party or attorney." You be the "judge" now. The facts: Judge Servaas 1-made a judgment clearly contrary to law in this matter in favor of the scum lords. 2-on a motion for reconsideration Judge Servass called based on the non favored party's information showing the decision was contrary to law which included Michigan cases that supported the matter, the judge would not allow the non favored party to speak, was condescending, humilitating, yelled at non favored party, etc while having no problem asking favored party to speak uninterrupted and even asked opinions of favored party. 3-The judge had to grudgingly admit non favored party was right and denied their trail in an erroroneous judgment on his part, but would not allow the injured party to have the trial unless they payed the attorney fees of the favored party in 14 days, stating if they did not pay the fees they would not get their trial but he would uphold the previous judgment admitted was wrong. The injured, non favored party's denied constitutional right to a trial is held ransom. 4-Upon appeal, this judge told the non favored party's attorney he was "going to make the appeal as difficult as possible" and posted the appeal bond at 5 times the normal rate. 5-The judge is aware that the injured party has filed a complaint against him with proper authorities. Now this judge has approved two more hearings requested to his court by his favored party. It seems clear this judge should be disqualifying himself as he is unable to be unbias in this matter. One must worry about our court systems when this type of violation to constitutional rights and civil rights are being violated by the very people we elect to uphold those rights for every citizen. You be the "judge". Is this a fair and impartial court tribunal?