Aaron
Fresno,#2UPDATE Employee
Wed, March 03, 2004
I do agree that they should have advertised that 12pc special....ALOT better and I did contact corporate to be able to answer questions about it. For the 7pc for 4.99 and In the memos sent out to each resturant spcificly said "when Explaining the meal MAKE SURE that you say that it is legs and thighs ONLY! For the 12pc special #1 the 12 pc special came with 3 breasts, 3 legs, 3 wings, and 3 thighs Anymore breasts will cost 1 dollar extra But then again I am not from southern california and my franchisee company does not have any stores in southern california. But we are located in central california and i can speak for my company when I say that we give chicken IN BUCKETS! as it was ment to be served in.
Tim
Valparaiso,#3Consumer Comment
Tue, November 04, 2003
The problem, David, is that there generally ARE NOT laws against this kind of thing. Laws against "false advertising" are generally contractual in nature - meaning that for someone to be guilty of false advertising, they would have to have breached a contract. Not to get too involved in a contracts lesson here (which I really couldn't do anyways because I don't know much about them) but advertisements can sometimes be construed as "offers," the acceptance of which forms a contract. In order for an advertisement to be construed as an offer it has to be pretty darn specific as to the terms, which television ads generally aren't, and thus T.V. ads are usually seen as mere "invitations" for the consumer to make an offer (I offer to pay you 7 dollars for a bucket of chicken, vs. I accept your offer of a bucket of chicken for 7 dollars). It's a pretty garbled and nonsensical area of law; the long and short of it is that companies have a great deal of leeway to present an ad that deceives the consumer into misconstruing what the ad is actually selling, and what it actually costs. Unfortunately, this type of advertising has become the norm in America. It seems that everything you buy nowadays either costs more or is worth less than what was advertised. The RipOffReport is fast becoming the consumer's best weapon against these and other deceptive practices, and should probably be mandatory reading for our nation's legislators.