Complaint Review: KMS Investigations - Internet

Stop the presses, are we now ignoring the statement of NON RECEIPT of your surveillance video made in your initial complaint Mark? What happend to all the complaining that you were taken and that you never received your video tape you paid for??? Thats the problem with this site, a consumer has an issue with service or product of a company and consumers talk about the owners drinking, or cheating, or what kind of pants he or she wears and all this other irrelevant material that has nothing to do with the matter at hand. You stated you did not receive your video tape and made a big deal of how you were hood winked and taken by KMS. Well Mike, here is the certified signature card of receipt you signed for receipt of a duplicate copy of the dvd US Post Office Certified receipt signed by Mark on August 4, 2007. Article #7006 0100 0000 4486 7103 Lets cut the crap and be honest now with the readers of this site Mike. IF this even gets posted it will suprise us but lets give it a shot anyway

To quote you Anthony "Where do people come up with this information and how does this get posted. Mr. Taylor is single and has never been married. This is funny but again its sad to see anything said being posted" One of you, either Bill Taylor or yourself is lying. The story Mr. Taylor told me was that he was divorced. HE had been divorced for a couple of years and hasn't been happier. He told me this and discussed how he understood my position since he had been there. He told me this when I first spoke to him in the process of hiring KMS for my own investigation. So tell me, are you lying to us now, or did he lie to me inorder to show empathy while trying to "set the hook'" with me. My report of your company's negligence/fraud in my situation will be posted here today.

To quote you Anthony "Where do people come up with this information and how does this get posted. Mr. Taylor is single and has never been married. This is funny but again its sad to see anything said being posted" One of you, either Bill Taylor or yourself is lying. The story Mr. Taylor told me was that he was divorced. HE had been divorced for a couple of years and hasn't been happier. He told me this and discussed how he understood my position since he had been there. He told me this when I first spoke to him in the process of hiring KMS for my own investigation. So tell me, are you lying to us now, or did he lie to me inorder to show empathy while trying to "set the hook'" with me. My report of your company's negligence/fraud in my situation will be posted here today.

To quote you Anthony "Where do people come up with this information and how does this get posted. Mr. Taylor is single and has never been married. This is funny but again its sad to see anything said being posted" One of you, either Bill Taylor or yourself is lying. The story Mr. Taylor told me was that he was divorced. HE had been divorced for a couple of years and hasn't been happier. He told me this and discussed how he understood my position since he had been there. He told me this when I first spoke to him in the process of hiring KMS for my own investigation. So tell me, are you lying to us now, or did he lie to me inorder to show empathy while trying to "set the hook'" with me. My report of your company's negligence/fraud in my situation will be posted here today.

We have send another dvd copy to this client because he reports he didnt receive his videotape. This time we sent it certified mail for signature purposes. Now being that Mark Anderson states he did not receive the "videotape he paid for" we thought well surely with the signature of receipt this time he would post a retraction or an appology or something. So lets wait and see how responsible Mark Anderson is now that he cant deny he received his video tape AGAIN for the second time.

Kevin - the word slander is defined as "words falsely spoken that damage the reputation of another". Based on this definition, i am in no way attempting to slander you or your company. This is proven by a) my statements are entirely true with hardcopy evidence available for anyone's review if they so please and b) your reputation is already damaged to shreds. For example, let's examine your criminal record listed below: 04/11/1998 666-484(a)-488 PC M Theft with prior conviction GUILTY 07/19/1999 Pled Guilty 02/10/1998 459/461(1) PC F Burglary ; first degree GUILTY 08/27/1998 02/10/1998 646.9(a) PC F Stalking GUILTY 08/27/1998 Pled Guilty 02/10/1998 422 PC F Criminal threats GUILTY 08/27/1998 03/09/1998 422 PC F Criminal threats GUILTY 08/27/1998 04/17/1998 273.6 PC M Violation of a protective order GUILTY 10/01/1995 270 PC M Failure to provide for minor child GUILTY Based on this information (which can be seen by anyone by going visionweb.occourts.org/Vision_Public/SearchCase.do and typing in Kevin Sianez in the approriate fields) if you are capable of not providing for your own child, what would leave anyone to believe that aren't capable of scamming innocent people out of their money? You can hide behind your made up names (e.g. Anthony, Toby, Mr. Taylor, etc) but everyone knows the truth....the so called "KMS Detective Agency" which is supposedly under "new ownership" is still the same old group of con artists known as KMS Investigations ran by the king of ripoffs himself, Kevin Sianez. Now, one may argue that this "new" company is indeed under new ownership and Kevin Sianez is out of the state, country, or wherever else he's claiming to be. If that were true, why does Kevin's voice remain on their Auto Attendant greeting and better yet, why does Kevin Sianez answer the phone?! Consumers beware of this crook. He will take your money without remorse. So now I suppose someone by the name of Anthony, Toby, Michael, or any other name that Kevin can come up with will post a rebuttal to my post lol. Once again folks, don't fall for the scam...do your research...

Robert needs to look within himself to recognize why his investigation business failed. Instead of trying to slander a former firm, he needs to receive the propert training and experience to become an investigator and know how to conduct investigations rather than write books. Robert and his spouse have gun permits which have been requested for removal by individuals amongst other issues he is dealing with on a proffesional and personal level. He advertises nationwide and alleges he uses former FBI staff but none of this is true. Robert is a one man operation that lists a PO Box in Beverly Hills and has an association with a New York PI.

Robert needs to look within himself to recognize why his investigation business failed. Instead of trying to slander a former firm, he needs to receive the propert training and experience to become an investigator and know how to conduct investigations rather than write books. Robert and his spouse have gun permits which have been requested for removal by individuals amongst other issues he is dealing with on a proffesional and personal level. He advertises nationwide and alleges he uses former FBI staff but none of this is true. Robert is a one man operation that lists a PO Box in Beverly Hills and has an association with a New York PI.

Robert needs to look within himself to recognize why his investigation business failed. Instead of trying to slander a former firm, he needs to receive the propert training and experience to become an investigator and know how to conduct investigations rather than write books. Robert and his spouse have gun permits which have been requested for removal by individuals amongst other issues he is dealing with on a proffesional and personal level. He advertises nationwide and alleges he uses former FBI staff but none of this is true. Robert is a one man operation that lists a PO Box in Beverly Hills and has an association with a New York PI.

Make no mistake, this information is accurate and verifiable. In fact, it's already been sent to Immigrationa Naturalization Services for review. So be prepared for your "wife" to be shipped back to South America and you to spend a long time in Jail.

We wish there was a way to legally post this clients material in this venue or another but we cant. By contractual agreement we are not allowed to post personal investigative material performed by a client but he cant post false material about us without verification. "immigration marriage fraud"?? now theres a laugh. Where do people come up with this information and how does this get posted. Mr. Taylor is single and has never been married. This is funny but again its sad to see anything said being posted.

Not only is Mr. Sianez a thief, he is also involved in immigration marriage fraud. Let's send this creep to jail and stop him from ripping anyone else off!

If there was ever a case where the client walked away with the jackpot of all services this is the one. We just purchased this company little more than two months ago and realizing there were complaints on this site about the previous ownership we work hard to keep our clients happy. This client paid for a comprhensive investigation into the activities of a police officer accused of assualting and harassing a news reporter in his community. Retainer agreements are very specific in the price paid for the services rendered. Worked into the price he paid was credit for one single background report normally priced at $220.00 per report. We ended up running 18 separate background reports for this client. In addition to an estimate of 40 hours Investigation projected. This client had direct knowledge or crucial facts pertaining to the person being investigated but held this information from us until he was confronted with out knowledge of these facts. We peformed in excess of 150 hours of investigation directly connected to his failure to provide facts he had knowledge of at a cost of $90.00 per hour. Do the math! In addition to one single asset search he paid for at a cost of $1039.00 per person. We ran 5 separate assest investigations 4 of which he did not pay for. Do that math again. This is a case where a client was babysat by a firm. We spoke with this client 87 different times with updates. WE emailed him 78 separate times. We issued him 8 very comprehensive reports. And this man has the nerve to post a complaint like this on this site or any site for that matter about "bad service"? We frankly expected a very well worded thank you letter of apprecation for the countless hours worked and going well beyond what we were paid for. This client is angry because he is being invoiced for thousands of dollars of additonal work he has yet to pay for so he posts this garbage about us. I am one of the new owners of this company and we stand by our product. Its clients like this that have caused firms like us to think carefully about doing FREE work for clients for matters they did not pay for

Read other complaints on this company. There is ample information about the person behind the company. I would highly suggest you file a complaint with the California Attorney General office. You can also try the California BSIS which licenses PI companies in CA, but this company is not licensed in that state so they won't be able to do much. Don't be fooled, they are trying to create a nationwide presence, but it is all smoke and mirrors, mail receiving and call forwarding services. Once enough victims file complaints, the AG will take action for fraud. There is a definate pattern among all the complaints about work not being performed. Good luck.