Please go to this link (((link redacted))) . And read about this company , .they are clear facts about their scam's and they still continue the Complet deception of posting false results and projection of making profit per trading day .Also giving false statements .. on their web site and misleading people like they maiking money
I have
read loads of stories on Andrew Barnett. He was involved with TI - Traders
International now it is called Goldrock.. below is one of the many quotes I have
found on him. He is just a sales man making as much money as possible out of
innocent people who believe in him.. There is always a catch trust me Andrew
Barnett is not offering anything for free, he is hoping you will sign up and
part with several thousand dollars at the time..
Andrew Barnett has no knowledge of trading he is a salesman and the nearest
thing to a con man that I have witnessed in my life. Jimmy Polydoris programmed
a signal for T.I called the JTI, it was an unmitigated disaster.
Do you really think these men know anything that you'd want to learn?
RH
South Mortang,#2Author of original report
Thu, November 15, 2012
Our records show 39 currently registered domains
and 323 previously registered domains with that search string in the
WHOIS record. The oldest record in our archive for which your search string
appears is for the domain EMINISFOREXTRADER.COM and was captured on 11/27/2008.
There are 4 unique nameservers used on the current domain list and 4 additional
unique nameservers used on the historical list.
Current Domain Report
39 Current Domains
33 .coms
1 .net
4 other gTLDs
1 ccTLD
It means that LTG, that same mob who claim to have everyones
best interest at heart, do not simply operate one web site but (according to
the records) currently own 39 websites (domains). Most of those are used for
advertising and various spamming.
But I find the earlier figure of 323 registered sites to be the most telling.
323 sites. They ain't no mum and dad outfit running a business website to
support their customers. Even before they left traders International, note that
they had already registered a forex related domain.
Makes you wonder about the
ethics there??!!
323 sites. A targeted, motivated internet marketer, playing up to peoples'
gullibility. Pity about the rubbish results. Three and a half years now. Not
one of them profitable. But they don't care. They've got all their websites
pulling in more punters.
With this report is self explanatory what this scam is all about and ow operates .
RH
South Mortang,#3Author of original report
Tue, November 13, 2012
Ignoring the 2009 recorded results - which from
memory were cooked (ie if they scaled out 33% of position at a 30 pip profit
target and the market moves back and takes out remaining 67% of the position at
a stop (usually at the trade entry price point) they still record the full 30
pips as the profit from the trade. The more accurate representation would be to
record the full loss and 33% of the profits when scaled out.)
2010: If you survived the first 6 months, net signaled result ended up being
recorded at 479 pips, or average of 40 pips per month. Am not sure what by Vid-Saver">money management method would enable one to make a
reasonable living from that
2011: -136 pips for the year. I know it's not just the pips that determine the
outcome, but still remains a pretty decent place to by Vid-Saver">start!
One can only assume that when the fine folk at LTG have built up their own bank
to an adequate level they will procure the best trader going around and turn
this all around, or retire. Or move on to their next venture to separate
innocents from their money.
Don't forget that the results were artificially
inflated by recording the gap trades (which LTG call the Phoenix to make it
sound like its a trade that they invented) in with the trading room totals.
With these they chose not to take into account the high spread that occurs when
the market first opens, or the fact that it is nigh impossible nor even
advisable to enter 10 trades at once.
The trading room itself made 774 calls which were SMSd to subscribers in 2010.
They resulted in a net loss of 826 pips. The damage was done by inane mechanical
trades and by those moderators without a finance industry background calling
their own trades.
But even if the result was +826 pips from 774 trades, it would represent a
trading edge so weak as to be useless. Once you take into account a little slippage,
or missing the odd good trade that takes off quickly, you'd end up behind
anyway. As for making a living from them, well, not even a remote chance of
that!