Hard Work
Mesa,#2Consumer Comment
Mon, August 04, 2008
If the storm had lasted that long before you got on the ship, why did you get on? I travel frequently and it is very easy to check the current and predicted weather in my destinations.
W. R.
Fort Worth,#3Author of original report
Fri, April 06, 2007
Jennifer:
We were told by employee's of the line that the captain could have docked in Honolulu and overnighted us there but decided not to. That it would cost the line $50,000 to do so but he opted not to. They make over $50,000 in a weeks worth of Bingo alone and average $300,000 per voyage in casino revenues and this infuriated most of the passengers.
As stated, the crew were not just talking they were singing. I won't name names as why jeopardize their jobs they went through worse hell than we did, of course they weren't paying what the passengers were paying to be there.
To top it off once we were were finally on land and able to speak to the residents of Hawaii they said it was even longer than the 1 week of storms it was 10 days.
My point is they knew way in advance and could have offered options.
They chose to DO NOTHING.
I've been on 4 cruises prior to this one and enjoyed them all immensely with NO COMPLAINTS (ELAINE FROM IDAHO) this was a nightmare and unless you've experienced a cruise gone awry it's really hard for any of your to understand not that I think anyone would even care to walk in our shoes. They literally, were removing passengers via coast guard. One had a heart attack.
This was not just about bad weather. I read 2 reports on cruise bruise that re iterated my claim of under reported numbers but I no longer see it listed there???? don't know why either. I've emailed them to inquire. Sam, what were the names of the sites you checked?? I'd appreciate being able to read other reports. All the people I know that have complained have done so via the line only and we all got the same tough lucky charlie letter's. and some are disputing with their credit card companies.
yes, Jennifer, I know how large and how strong these ships are do you know what it's like to fall from your bed due to the rocking? I'm telling you this was how bad it was. I could not leave the cabin for 4 days. Everytime I stood up my stomach left my body! People were being flown from side to side in the halls and the decks were taped off with yellow crime scene tape. nobody was allowed on deck. the water in the swimming pools and jacuzzis was splashing out. you could not use most of the ammenities.
it was a total disaster. crew were dropping like flies. heck, if I were them I'd say I had NORO just to have a day off! They had been working by the end of this cruise for a month without a day off and putting in 20 hour shifts to compensate for the ill crew.
any h*o it is obvious no matter what I say the die hard cruisers will jeer and jab.
enjoy your cruising.
should this happen to you..
remember these words...
Jennifer if that's the case then why all the lies? why was their passengers services people tellin everyone at the front desk that their LA office was working on it. why did they mention we might overnight in HNL? or spend more time in Ensenada? That this was a high priority in the LA office. then 7 days later. NOTHING!
I mean, this was coming from THEIR PEOPLE! They did absolutely nothing, further more they doubled the stakes in the casino when we couldn't dock. I thought there would be mutiny that day. many of the older gentlemen went through the roof and demanded something be done and eventually it was they lowered them back down. PEOPLE were NOT HAPPY AT ALL. This is their business? They deal in vacations and dreams and they truly failed on this voyage. They can improve greatly.
I'm not whining here I'm alerting the public of what happens when things go wrong. so they can make a more informed decision as where their vacation dollars go and how far to check for weather. you literally need to contact that country for a report, don't rely on the news from home that's for sure.
No, Jennifer, I didn't realize the port fee's were only $25 which would make $100 for our party of 4.
Does it sound accurately reported to you when entire departments were closed on the ship? due to NORO? when lines for dinner were 2.5 hours long?? I think not.
Jennifer
Levittown,#4Consumer Comment
Fri, April 06, 2007
Ports for cruises are booked a long time in advance and when there is bad weather, it is not always possible for a Plan B. Their choice is to cancel the cruise, reroute if possible (meaning change the order of the planned ports) or cruise to an entirely new destination. A new destination is problematic because it is usually a destination not normally used at that time of year.
Once cruise line took a beating because the chose to go to Canada instead of the warmer climate they were supposed to go to.
On foreign flagged ships, like Princess, this is further complicated by the Jones Act which says they must go to at least one foreign port. I was on a cruise last year that was supposed to go to Cape Canaveral, Miami and then the Bahamas. Because of weather, we reversed the ports and went to the Bahamas first.
One final thought, you say you were deliberately taken took you into the eye of a storm. Do you think any cruise line is going to make a decision that is going to put their ship, their employees and their passengers into harm? Do you have any idea how much a ship costs? No, these decisions are not made lightly!
As far as your claim that they under reported the cases of Noro. By law, they must report every case of Noro that they treat. This is the caveat! Many people don't go to the medical center and therefore the case is not reported to the crew and ultimately the CDC. People are afraid they will be quarantined so they try to treat the symptoms themselves and become little Typhoid Marys further spreading the virus. Others think that it's only sea sickness and don't go for treatment.
As far as the port fees go, you do realize they will only be about $25. The actual port fees are minimal. The rest is government fees and taxes.
Jennifer
Levittown,#5Consumer Comment
Fri, April 06, 2007
Ports for cruises are booked a long time in advance and when there is bad weather, it is not always possible for a Plan B. Their choice is to cancel the cruise, reroute if possible (meaning change the order of the planned ports) or cruise to an entirely new destination. A new destination is problematic because it is usually a destination not normally used at that time of year.
Once cruise line took a beating because the chose to go to Canada instead of the warmer climate they were supposed to go to.
On foreign flagged ships, like Princess, this is further complicated by the Jones Act which says they must go to at least one foreign port. I was on a cruise last year that was supposed to go to Cape Canaveral, Miami and then the Bahamas. Because of weather, we reversed the ports and went to the Bahamas first.
One final thought, you say you were deliberately taken took you into the eye of a storm. Do you think any cruise line is going to make a decision that is going to put their ship, their employees and their passengers into harm? Do you have any idea how much a ship costs? No, these decisions are not made lightly!
As far as your claim that they under reported the cases of Noro. By law, they must report every case of Noro that they treat. This is the caveat! Many people don't go to the medical center and therefore the case is not reported to the crew and ultimately the CDC. People are afraid they will be quarantined so they try to treat the symptoms themselves and become little Typhoid Marys further spreading the virus. Others think that it's only sea sickness and don't go for treatment.
As far as the port fees go, you do realize they will only be about $25. The actual port fees are minimal. The rest is government fees and taxes.
Jennifer
Levittown,#6Consumer Comment
Fri, April 06, 2007
Ports for cruises are booked a long time in advance and when there is bad weather, it is not always possible for a Plan B. Their choice is to cancel the cruise, reroute if possible (meaning change the order of the planned ports) or cruise to an entirely new destination. A new destination is problematic because it is usually a destination not normally used at that time of year.
Once cruise line took a beating because the chose to go to Canada instead of the warmer climate they were supposed to go to.
On foreign flagged ships, like Princess, this is further complicated by the Jones Act which says they must go to at least one foreign port. I was on a cruise last year that was supposed to go to Cape Canaveral, Miami and then the Bahamas. Because of weather, we reversed the ports and went to the Bahamas first.
One final thought, you say you were deliberately taken took you into the eye of a storm. Do you think any cruise line is going to make a decision that is going to put their ship, their employees and their passengers into harm? Do you have any idea how much a ship costs? No, these decisions are not made lightly!
As far as your claim that they under reported the cases of Noro. By law, they must report every case of Noro that they treat. This is the caveat! Many people don't go to the medical center and therefore the case is not reported to the crew and ultimately the CDC. People are afraid they will be quarantined so they try to treat the symptoms themselves and become little Typhoid Marys further spreading the virus. Others think that it's only sea sickness and don't go for treatment.
As far as the port fees go, you do realize they will only be about $25. The actual port fees are minimal. The rest is government fees and taxes.
Jennifer
Levittown,#7Consumer Comment
Fri, April 06, 2007
Ports for cruises are booked a long time in advance and when there is bad weather, it is not always possible for a Plan B. Their choice is to cancel the cruise, reroute if possible (meaning change the order of the planned ports) or cruise to an entirely new destination. A new destination is problematic because it is usually a destination not normally used at that time of year.
Once cruise line took a beating because the chose to go to Canada instead of the warmer climate they were supposed to go to.
On foreign flagged ships, like Princess, this is further complicated by the Jones Act which says they must go to at least one foreign port. I was on a cruise last year that was supposed to go to Cape Canaveral, Miami and then the Bahamas. Because of weather, we reversed the ports and went to the Bahamas first.
One final thought, you say you were deliberately taken took you into the eye of a storm. Do you think any cruise line is going to make a decision that is going to put their ship, their employees and their passengers into harm? Do you have any idea how much a ship costs? No, these decisions are not made lightly!
As far as your claim that they under reported the cases of Noro. By law, they must report every case of Noro that they treat. This is the caveat! Many people don't go to the medical center and therefore the case is not reported to the crew and ultimately the CDC. People are afraid they will be quarantined so they try to treat the symptoms themselves and become little Typhoid Marys further spreading the virus. Others think that it's only sea sickness and don't go for treatment.
As far as the port fees go, you do realize they will only be about $25. The actual port fees are minimal. The rest is government fees and taxes.
Regina
Fort Worth,#8Author of original report
Fri, April 06, 2007
Once more, Honest Sam, it wasn't about a sudden storm but a storm that had been in existence for a minimum of 7 days prior to our departing. It was the same crew for God's Sake! They were more disgusted with this captain than the passengers. There was NO communication and when there was you couldn't understand the guy, the crew would roll their eyes in disgust and they said he was new and temporary and they were very embarrassed. I got my information, Sir, from the Crew. The numbers of NORO were severely under reported by the Line.......check out the cruise bruise dot come site once more and you will read a report about how severely under reported the numbers were.
It was a nightmare. I'm not trying to portray anything except what happened. I'm still in touch with many of the passengers and do have many copies of their complaint letters to the line as we had promised to keep in touch. Many were well experienced cruisers and they had never in their lives experienced anything like this. It was a real mess. So, again, honest Sam. Unless you were there you really need not comment unless the sole purpose is to infuriate further which, to be honest after that ordeal nothing would ever bother me again. Like I said, I hope this never happens to you, it was a real eye opener as to how poorly they respond during a crisis. I would not have complained if they were honest and offered refunds or change of dates due to the bad weather since I spent most of the time puking in the cabin.
I mean, why go. Many peopole there saved their entire lives or for several years for their hawaiin cruise of a lifetime many will never get to go back and I really felt for them to be that disappointed when other arrangements could have been made to accomodate everyone. they could have re routed the ship around the storm but all they cared about was lining their pockets and doubling the stakes in the casino when we hadn't been off the ship in 7 days. 13 for the crew they were dropping like flies. they closed the casino, cancelled shows, long lines for food, food had to be served we could no longer serve ourselves at the buffet, if anyone became ill no matter what the reason they were quarantined, several people in cabins near to ours NEVER got off the ship they were quarantined the entire 15 days and most of the dining room had food poisoning on the seafood pasta night and they were all quarantined as they would not acknowledge food poisoning and you are going to say, I'm portraying........give me a break, honest Sam, whoever you are.......if you were on that ship you would be complaining too! 10 people I know stopped payment on via their credit cards and are disputing the charges but we paid in full in October....so again, MS. know it all from Idaho, we are not the kind of people looking for a hand out we're the people that give them but whats right is right and whats wrong is wrong.
So, your saying, Sam if there's a tsunami at sea or a typhoon and the line has adequate time in advance to make alternate arrangements and they decide to just care about their bottom line and steer you right into that typhoon or tsunami then that's alright by honest Sam.....the safety of the passengers shouldnt be considered it's just BUSINESS AS USUAL. Wow! Where do you people come from???
Honest Sam
Bay Area,#9Consumer Comment
Thu, April 05, 2007
"If you were not on Voyage 2703 and are not a cruise line representative then what business do you have responding to my email? "
You post on a public compalint site and wonder why people respond to your "email."
What did you expect?
Anyways to be fair it does sound like the cruise did have a few problems, mostly due to weather - hardly the control of the cruise line.
I took a peek at the following page to get an understanding of what happened on that voyage:
(((ROR REDACTED LINK FOR SECURITY PURPOSES)))(Don't know if the links will stay, if not take a look at the cruise critic website in the member review area for Island Princess in January)
Out of 4 reviews, 3 are very positive and take the weather (which is obviously beyond the control of the cruise line) in stride. The 4th like you complains about the weather, blaming the captain and it goes downhill from there.
As for the noro outbreak, stats according to the Center for Disease Control show 9% of passengers and 4% of crew coming down with it.
Elevated numbers, but hardly the picture you tried to portray.
CLICK here to see why Rip-off Report, as a matter of policy, deleted either a phone number, link or e-mail address from this Report.
Regina
Fort Worth,#10Author of original report
Thu, April 05, 2007
Dear Elaine From Idaho:
If you were not on Voyage 2703 and are not a cruise line representative then what business do you have responding to my email? I won't respond to any of your other judgements or accusations as THEY SPEAK VOLUMES for your character or lack of as a person.
Both the cruise line and the travel agent that specializes in cruises lied to us and hundreds of other passengers that shared similar story's. When I asked them about the rainy/stormy season, I was told..."The worst is over by Thanksgiving", many others were told it was over by Christmas... this was told to me by a Princess reservations representative. The owner of the travel agency at least apologized and offered us a 5% discount on our next cruise, when he found out that his representative also lied and stated that it was not the rainy/stormy season. Not that we'll be taking one any time soon, if ever after this nightmare. Until you've walked in our shoes you really need to Jam one of those big Idaho's in your big mouth!
Princess just sticks to the YOU CAN'T CONTROL THE WEATHER. I can assure you if this were a sudden storm we would not have complained.
The storm was in existence for a week prior to our vogage and there WAS NO PLAN B. We missed 2 ports, Maui and Kauai and THEY KEPT THE PORT CHARGES!!! How low is that. That is outright stealing!
Enjoy your next cruise, ELAINE FROM IDAHO! This cruise line LOVES PEOPLE of your mentality! That's how they literally get away with murder!
If I were you, I would educate myself further before opening my big mouth and berating victims of Princess Cruises. Why not check out: (((ROR REDACTED LINK FOR SECURITY PURPOSES))) and see how severely under reported the amount of ill passengers/crew your less than honorable cruise line reported. They are crooks and thieves and could care less about the safety or well being of their passengers. This was a real eye opener on how they respond during a crisis and how they skirt the REAL ISSUE, which was NO PLAN B.
I am very happy you have not experienced such a disaster at sea, Elaine from Idaho, we haven't either,until this voyage, but when you do, I also hope someone as ignorant of the facts as you are doesn't become a pointless cheerleader for the Line and completely unsympathetic to what you have been through.
Although, I'm old enough to know, WE REAP WHAT WE SEW and what goes around comes around and usually ten fold.......
Stick with peeling those potato's ELAINE FROM IDAHO!!!
RESPUDFULLY YOURS,
CLICK here to see why Rip-off Report, as a matter of policy, deleted either a phone number, link or e-mail address from this Report.
Elaine
Boise,#11Consumer Suggestion
Wed, April 04, 2007
I have nothing but praise for Princess Cruises. Safety was of utmost concern. I think you should be a bit upset with your travel agent who should have 1) warned you about weather issues during the time of year you went and 2) advised you what the better deal was relative to purchasing air fare. It's not always the best deal to go with the cruise line; sometimes its best to buy an airline ticket separately, which is what I did. And despite your language, captains of these multi-million dollar ships are not incompetent. But of course, they aren't hired to wait hand-and-foot on a single whiney passenger, either. How is weather related issues the fault of the captain? Boy, you are giving him a lot of authority! And if the cruise line had cancelled the cruise, wouldn't you be posting that they cancelled with no warning! Of course you would!
Since this is the SECOND time I've seen your post (with a new date of authoring) - I think that you are a professional complainer, probably had a great trip and are trying to get your money back. If I were Princess, I probably would credit you some money back...and ban you from cruising with them again.
You go, Princess! I hope to be cruising with you again soon. It was by far the best vacation I've ever had!