Danielle
Pacific Grove,#2Author of original report
Sun, February 26, 2006
I stand by everything I stated in my original report 100%. Also, the person who responded in the rebuttal clearly did not understand what I said, as I made it clear I had been an employee. They also did not even know my gender, so their claim of having worked with me is completely absurd. Rather, I think the rebuttal was left by the owner of the company, who has the charm and integrity of a used car salesman. This company and its employees cannot and should not be trusted. They promise agents great leads, and produce nothing of value. And they charge thousands of dollars for this misleading service.
Danielle
Pacific Grove,#3Author of original report
Sun, February 26, 2006
I stand by everything I stated in my original report 100%. Also, the person who responded in the rebuttal clearly did not understand what I said, as I made it clear I had been an employee. They also did not even know my gender, so their claim of having worked with me is completely absurd. Rather, I think the rebuttal was left by the owner of the company, who has the charm and integrity of a used car salesman. This company and its employees cannot and should not be trusted. They promise agents great leads, and produce nothing of value. And they charge thousands of dollars for this misleading service.
Danielle
Pacific Grove,#4Author of original report
Sun, February 26, 2006
I stand by everything I stated in my original report 100%. Also, the person who responded in the rebuttal clearly did not understand what I said, as I made it clear I had been an employee. They also did not even know my gender, so their claim of having worked with me is completely absurd. Rather, I think the rebuttal was left by the owner of the company, who has the charm and integrity of a used car salesman. This company and its employees cannot and should not be trusted. They promise agents great leads, and produce nothing of value. And they charge thousands of dollars for this misleading service.
Danielle
Pacific Grove,#5Author of original report
Sun, February 26, 2006
I stand by everything I stated in my original report 100%. Also, the person who responded in the rebuttal clearly did not understand what I said, as I made it clear I had been an employee. They also did not even know my gender, so their claim of having worked with me is completely absurd. Rather, I think the rebuttal was left by the owner of the company, who has the charm and integrity of a used car salesman. This company and its employees cannot and should not be trusted. They promise agents great leads, and produce nothing of value. And they charge thousands of dollars for this misleading service.
Phillip
Sacramento,#6UPDATE EX-employee responds
Mon, February 20, 2006
The reported "complaint" against AgentConnect is completely false. This was created by an ex-employee who was terminated over bad business practices of his own and not following the specific direction of his manager to cease falsifying information to agents. I ask you to think about 3 things when you read this "complaint": 1. How would an unhappy agent know about the companies instructions to its employees? 2. Why would an unhappy agent care about how the commissions are paid to the staff? 3. If this were truthfully from an "insider", why would the comments of an ex-employee who was not successful and not happy warrant attention? In the end, this ex-employee was not following the companies code of ethics and he was terminated. He was unhappy himself and decided to tear down the company through false "complaints". If you wish to speak to this person, you can find him at www.rightdowntown.com doing his own form of business now. I worked alongside this person and have since moved onto doing my own loan business. I enjoyed and learned a lot from my time at AgentConnect/Reply and was never impressed with this person's professionalism. Things never change.