Complaint Review: RPHaven - Internet

http://www.bizapedia.com/people/FLORIDA/ORLANDO/ZACHARY-SPRAGUE.html

Zach, owner of RPH under the username of Sadako, has managed to take what was a good concept, and ruined it beyond repair. No one imagined that this was the way it was going to turn out when he took over the site some years ago, and no one ever imagined he'd start leaving the same taste in people's mouths as the owner of another well know roleplaying site, RolePlayChat.

From a distant perspective, it's immediately clear to the viewer that Zach has issues, not only with maintaining a site within a realm of professionalism, but also within the realm of morality. On the latter, for example, he has numerous profiles in which characters under the legal age of consent (within the United States) are seen in these profiles indulging in things of a sexual nature. These profiles are, also, geared towards sexual encounters. Fictional or not, people have been labeled pedophiles before for this very thing, taken to court on those grounds, and beaten. And I, for one, believe he should see his day in court for that very matter, soon.

As if that was not enough, he disregards the rules of his own site to carry out grudges, and do the will of people who've won him over. At this very moment in time, a married woman (who also cheats on her husband) brags to her friends about how he's obsessed with her. And given that he attacks anyone she has issue with, I don't disbelieve her.

While, yes, it is true that it is his site and he can do with it as he pleases, the fact that he is so easily swayed by a woman who is clearly using him to get her way is a bit, shall we say, frightening for the user-base?

Furthermore, he breaches even more morality, and possibly even legality, with the fact that he pokes at people's personal instant messages without their knowledge or consent. Yes, Zach, this will come back to haunt you.

Moving on, his site once offered a decent service. This was so, until he started stealing code without crediting the owners, breaking services and functions for 'security purposes' (because he cannot admit that he's just really shoddy at coding), and trying to force down the throats of RPH users the service of a game he 'works' on in his free time(That very game is an open-sourced game that he refuses to accredit the original makers for), and circumvents letting his site be considered a business by calling payments 'donations'.

How right does this seem to you, reader, that you must donate for credits on this site to expand your number of character slots, use permanent statuses, more profile coding options, and create an official group? Does that even sound remotely like donating? Because it sounds like 'paid services' to everyone else. Paid services which are not even remotely guaranteed to work.

Now, he's stripped his site of the easiest methods to donate, and now forces people to donate to his open-sourced game (which again, he gives no credit to the original makers for) to get credits on-site.

Take from that what you will- the service is a ripoff, on both a moral and legal scale.

No, actually, it's not. I note that you do not one thing other than go 'Nuh-h!' to any of the above allegations. I also note that not one thing has happened to improve the climate on the site or make it proof against the very violations that we both know take place on the daily.

It's going to catch up to you. Someone is going to do something severely illegal and be caught for it. There are also ample rumors of things you yourself have done and been involved in, Zach. This has absolutely zero to do with any ill will towards being banned; I could care less, since your site is a cesspit of really disgusting activity. I have no intent of being caught up in whatever happens when the place comes down, so all I am doing is doing the right thing and warning people to steer clear. 

Peer reporting as you do it isn't enough, especially when a ban can be easily and repeatedly circumvented by any minors you ban, even if they don't use a Virtual Private Network. I know this is possible, because there are multiple people who have done it and told me about it.

When the site dies and you go down with it, it will be good riddance to bad garbage.

I mean, I shouldn't really need a rebuttle to this because when you read it you can clearly tell it's just some crazy person making up things and going off a tangent.But, there you go.

This "reporter" is just someone that's mad that they got banned from the site for constantly harrassing people and causing drama.

I could respond to the lies here, but it's much easier to say that every single thing is a lie, which it is. There is not even a single  truthful sentence in the entire thing, at best a few that are lies made from half truths.