Theresa
Atlanta,#2Consumer Comment
Wed, May 11, 2005
Well, I just had a comment to the rebuttal. The person said that there would have been a repo but that is not true. The dealership relinquished their control of the vehicle when the bank purchased the account. So they would not be able to do anything about the vehicle itself but only for the down payment check. Also, business ethics should be what a company stands behind. If they are having constant disputes with checks and people not being satisfied with their ethics (not even the product), then they will continue to loose business. Also, if the check was dated 30 days out, obviously Disgruntled didn't have the total amount until that time. So to say that the person did not have the money is obvious. If it was a problem then the check never should have gotten approved by the management there. So it all goes full circle. Good business breeds good business. I think what the problem is sounds like customer satisfaction and relations. As well as looking at how their salesmen try to get cars out the door.
Yolanda
Atlanta,#3Consumer Comment
Tue, May 10, 2005
Why are you coming down on this business so hard? I kind of UNDERSTAND your position, but if the decision were mine to make on who's responsible or in the wrong you would lose. If you do not have the money available, REGARDLESS of what they say, do not give them access to your account; a postdated check. They are NOT obligated to keep track of your finances. And ultimately YOU will be responsible for any transactions. Your signature is on that check. So look at this as a learning lesson: They could have repossessed the vehicle; imagine how that would look, not only to your bank, but any future financial transaction. Move on and be more responsible and accountable!