- Report: #196836
Complaint Review: Stan Schultz AKA Schultz And Schultz Enterprises US Loss Mitigation - Poquoson Virginia
-
Author Confirmed
Why?
Stan Schultz AKA Schultz And Schultz Enterprises US Loss Mitigation
360 Wythe Creek Rd, Ste E Poquoson, 23662 Virginia, U.S.A.
Phone:
757-868-8600
Web:
N/A
Categories:
Business Rating:
(0)
Tell us has your experience with this business or person been good?
Stan Schultz AKA Schultz And Schultz Enterprises, US Loss Mitigation ripoff, only received partial payment of case owed, NOT the full amount owed was paid Poquoson Virginia
Completed a Loss Mitigation case on Johnny Cook that was entered on January 11, 2006 and this was WAY BEFORE the second 70/30 split contract was signed that was NEVER fully paid by Stan Schultz of US Loss Mitigation AKA Schultz and Schultz Enterprises. The 70/30 split contract was NOT signed and did NOT go into effect until January 30, 2006. Was supposed to be paid a total of $577.00, which was to be split between my partner, Evangeline Nunley and myself for a total of 288.00/EACH. We only received partial payment of $298.50, of which was received by my partner, Evangeline Nunley at the end of May. It cleared their bank on June 2, 2006. The Johnny Cook Case was COMPLETED back in the beginning of March and we still have NOT been paid the total amount that we are owed to date!
Still awaiting rest of the payment of $288 to be sent to me for having completed the services for this company. Have documenation to prove and support my claim on this particular case.
Tillie
Opelika, Alabama
U.S.A.
Still awaiting rest of the payment of $288 to be sent to me for having completed the services for this company. Have documenation to prove and support my claim on this particular case.
Tillie
Opelika, Alabama
U.S.A.
1 Updates & Rebuttals
Stan
Poquson,Virginia,
U.S.A.
Associate Paid in full based on current IC Agreement in Office.
#2REBUTTAL Owner of company
Thu, July 20, 2006
Case on Johnnny Cook was closed and partner was paid per current agreement in office on file. Tillie disputed this saying that her agreement was 40/60 and all our firm asked was a copy of what she claimed to have faxed us and we would agree to pay her on that amount. She refused to send us this agreement. The only choice we had was to pay on the contract we had. The partner was paid the correct fee split according to the contract we had, 70/30. Stan Schultz Poquoson, VA U.S.A.
