- Report: #800118
Complaint Review: Vom Aztlan Rottweilers - Whittier California
Reported By:
Vom Aztlan Victim -
Honolulu, Hawaii, USA
Submitted:
Updated:
-
Author Not Confirmed
Why?
Vom Aztlan Rottweilers
PO BOX 6489 Whittier, 90609 California, United States of America
Phone:
562-577-4447
Web:
Categories:
Business Rating:
(0)
Tell us has your experience with this business or person been good?
Vom Aztlan Rottweilers Ruben Pina Vom Aztlan Big Bucks with Bad Product Whittier, California
Ruben, You said to call you but I called and left messages and my phone # twice with no reply. My third call was cut off before it went to message. I wanted an Unkas puppy which you did not have so we made a deal for Darrah including semen for 2 inseminations. Now I have over $7000 invested in Darrah, a b***h that never got over her shyness from being raised in a kennel for the first 16 months. Darrah is dangerous around children and does not come when she is called. Darrah also shows separation anxiety and destructive behavior. I still want an Unkas puppy but the semen you provided is not adequate.
Two vets said on Monday, June 21, 2010 8:54 pm :
Dear Mr. Johnson, The frozen semen used to inseminate your rottweiler "Darrah" appeared deficient on our preinsemination examination. The microscopic examination revealed a sample that was about 60% motile. The speed of progression was about a 3-3.5 out of 5. And most concerning was the concentration of this sample. Because of the amount of sample needed to run a count one was not done, but the count was very very low from the 2 straws that we used. The sample was also examined by Dr. Morikami for verification. If you have any further questions, please contact me. Sincerely, Darin Hisanaga DVM
Two vets said on Monday, June 21, 2010 8:54 pm :
Dear Mr. Johnson, The frozen semen used to inseminate your rottweiler "Darrah" appeared deficient on our preinsemination examination. The microscopic examination revealed a sample that was about 60% motile. The speed of progression was about a 3-3.5 out of 5. And most concerning was the concentration of this sample. Because of the amount of sample needed to run a count one was not done, but the count was very very low from the 2 straws that we used. The sample was also examined by Dr. Morikami for verification. If you have any further questions, please contact me. Sincerely, Darin Hisanaga DVM
