;
  • Report:  #205274

Complaint Review: Walmart - Oldsmar Florida

Reported By:
- Wesley Chapel, Florida,
Submitted:
Updated:

Walmart
3801 Tampa Rd Oldsmar, Florida, U.S.A.
Phone:
813-854-3261
Web:
N/A
Categories:
Tell us has your experience with this business or person been good? What's this?
I brought my car in for an oil change. After a lengthy time period, the Manager has the technician come over to me and explain that he mistood my "gear box drain plug" for my oil pan drain plug. I'm told on a 1999 Subaru Forrester, this is not unimaginable. I was told not to worry as they would put the proper weight or oil back into my "gear box" and it would be fine. They did not charge me for any services, and I left without altrication.

Several months later I began to have an issue with my transmission not wanting to engage from Park to Drive. I hessitated and then went into gear after reving the engine a little. After the car is in gear, it operates normally. Not thinking this was related to the service, I chalked it up to my car getting older and needing service that I couldn't afford.

Three months after bringing the car to Walmart, I brought the car to a Midas to have the next oil change. I told them of the problem so they would know what to do when they drove it into the bay. Upon returning, they told me that as part of the oil change they inspected the transmission fluid, and whatever was in there, was definately NOT transmission fluid. I immediately put two and two together and realized what had happened. Walmart had put some sort of oil in my transmission.

For two years I have been arguing with them to resolve the problem only to have the claims department say I have no proof that Walmart was the ones who put the oil in there. I'm still driving today with the fluid they put in the transmission and the same issue that originally arose.

I'm writinig a letter to their corperate today and came accross this site while trying to research others in my same situation. Does anyone have help or an idea what I can do?!?

Thanks.

Jeff

Wesley Chapel, Florida
U.S.A.


5 Updates & Rebuttals

Raymond

Whitney,
Texas,
U.S.A.
No fault ...Your fault.

#2Consumer Comment

Thu, August 10, 2006

Yes that is right, it is your fault. Upon the occurance of the mistake you were the one responsible to have Wal-Mart make note, on their paperwork with the proper signatures of management, of all that transpired during your visit for maintenance. Sorry but this is a fact. It is called CYA(not a legal term). Then you would have had recourse against them once you found the problem. Also, Wal-Mart would not liable for the entire amount of a replacement transmission they would only be liable for a pro rated value of the transmission based on age and mileage. This would severally devalue the amount that you would receive. I also agree with a previous post here advising that you are liable to "Mitigate Damage", no matter if there is any changes to the performance of the transmission. If damages occured from the mistake then additional damages most likely are occuring from continual useage.


Robert

Jacksonville,
Florida,
U.S.A.
I did not say "no fault"

#3Consumer Comment

Thu, August 10, 2006

I said, "You'll have a hard time trying to recoup anything from WalMart. All an oil analysis will show is that it's a petroleum product. Both are." I do not dispute damge is done to your transaxle. I also do not dispute engine oil can do that. I am simply saying an oil analysis will show nothing more than the fluid is petroleum based. It will also show how much, and what type, metal in the oil. But, that's it. Using that as your proof, the Judge will toss it out. This will sound callous, but it's the truth. There is a reason places like that charge very little. They have a grand total of ZERO mechanics working for them. The quickie lube places at least train their kids. Even so, they average one engine per month, destroyed. Most independent shops charge about $5 more than the CHEAP places. To save that $5, you'll spend $4000. CHEAP has never been equated to GOOD.


Jeff

Wesley Chapel,
Florida,
U.S.A.
No fault?

#4Author of original report

Thu, August 10, 2006

I understand. I assumed that, if anything, the possible issue was that the improper oil was preventing the trans from working properly. If so, then why would Subaru say that I need to replace the trans completely? The cost of which is $4,000. Also, the symptoms have not worsened or changed. It's doing exactly what it did from day one. Also, Walmart has completely turned down my claim. They have not said anything except that I "can't prove they did it"... which they obviously did. The hood was not even lifted in between those to services.


Robert

Jacksonville,
Florida,
U.S.A.
Ummmmm

#5Consumer Comment

Wed, August 09, 2006

ATF is oil. It's a 5 wt oil with friction modifiers , red dye(or blue), and detergents. Just like engine oil, it turns black when it's worn out its' usefullness. You'll have a hard time trying to recoup anything from WalMart. All an oil analysis will show is that it's a petroleum product. Both are. Good luck though.


Hugh

Paducah,
Kentucky,
U.S.A.
Change the oil!

#6Consumer Suggestion

Wed, August 09, 2006

I would go ahead and get the correct oil installed in your transaxle. Who knows, you might just correct the problem you are having by simply doing that. You do have some responsibility to mitigate the damages - that is, limit the damage done to the transmission by the incorrect oil. Let's say Wal-Mart ends up agreeing to pay and repairs are $2000 - they might very well argue, "well, if he had changed the oil to the correct one back when the Midas store told him it was the wrong oil, then the damage would only have been $500, so that's all we are going to pay".

Reports & Rebuttal
Respond to this report!
Also a victim?
Repair Your Reputation!
//