allartclassic.com charmed me into considering online sources for purchasing paintings. From the website descriptions, they claimed that the oil paints that they used in their art is Gamblin Oil.
So, I ended up buying them thinking that they were as awesome as they were described by the website. I regret this decision ever since I made the purchase as I have discovered that their artists use counterfeit paints.
A few weeks into owning the so called 'artwork', I noticed that it had started to fade. Initially, I ignored this thinking that it was just going to lose a fraction of a shade and stop. A month later, they were totally a different thing. They had lost their original color quite a lot and nothing remained intact from the original colors. It then dawned on me that I had been duped. I asked them for refund, but no any response.
H. Richmand
New York,#2Consumer Comment
Tue, October 03, 2017
The person who posted this report is perhaps someone from a competion company who is not happy with their diminishing business. I have bought at least a dozen reproductions from Allartclassic and was delighted each time with their work. Previously I used to buy paintings from a store in Asia and was very disappointed. Posting fake negative reprots like this definitely is not the proper way to attract more customers and if this is some David who is doing it, then all the other affected businesses should take the proper legal action against this practice.
Reporting this abuse from 1st-Art-Gallery.com to Google is also an option. The search giant could certainly put penalties to websites using unfair competition methods. I would also suggest to Ripoffreport administrators to check each report and verify it's authenticity before publishing lies on their own website.
I've attached a picture of my last Caravaggio reproduction from Allartclassic so anyone can see that the quality of their work is excellent and they should not belive this negative report from a competition site.
Marcel
Paris,#3Consumer Comment
Thu, September 28, 2017
This is one a number of fake posts made between 17 and 21 September, not by a real customer, but by the twisted and malicious owner of 1st-art-gallery.com, a deranged Israeli called David. He has posted negative comments to over 20 competitor sites as he is angry about the large number of real factual negative reviews that his Chinese business, 1st-art-gallery.com receives due to the poor quality of their paintings and his appalling bad customer service. His psychotic behavior was predicted by one of his many dis-satisfied customers over three years ago. The customer, who had complained about the shoddy painting bought from 1st-art-gallery but praised the reproduction he subsequently bought from one of 1st-art-gallery’s honest competitor’s, got it exactly right when he wrote,
I am totally delighted with it (the painting from one of 1st-art-gallery’s competitors), just as I was disgusted by the apology for art that I was sent by 1st Art Gallery. I won't tell you here who I got it from (you will need to do some homework) because I confidently suspect that these people would turn very nasty towards that supplier (they are clearly that type), and that would not be fair.
The libeled sites are now joining together to bring legal charges against the disgusting Israeli owner of 1st-art-gallery.com
Fake posts by pyscho David from 1st-art-gallery.com include
Cvernet
Paris,#4REBUTTAL Owner of company
Fri, August 18, 2017
Absolutely fake report, this person Michael Perez never bought a product from the company. It would be much wiser if a person filing a report presented a document to prove that he actually purchased a product, an invoice email or something.. We never had a client under this name, nor is true what he wrote. It is definitely a fake report from some of our competitots, trying to ruin our reputation posting fake reports like this on internet.