Complaint Review: AMERICAN INVESTMENT SERVICE - MIAMI Florida

I'M THE VICTIM OF MORTGAGE FRAUD... UNREGULATED PRIVATE LENDER.. NO STATE LICENSE, NOT EVEN A OCCUPAITIONAL LICENSE, NO ZONING USE PERMIT AUTHORIZING THIS COMPANY TO CONDUCT BUSINESS IN THE CITY OF MIAMI, BUT THAT DIDN'T STOP THESE FOLKS FROM CONDUCTING WHAT WE FEEL IS A BOILER ROOM MORTGAGE OPERATION.THEY LEND TO TAKE...UNDER DURESS AND WITHOUT  THE RIGHT TO HAVE MY COUNSEL REVIEW THE CLOSING DOCUMENT, ATTORNEY KASS , REQUEST MY APPEARENCE TO HIS OFFICE 10:30 PM VERY ODD HOURS TO CLOSE A MORTGAGE... I DIDN'T FEEL GOOD ABOUT THE LATE NIGHT CLOSING,SO I REQUESTED HE ALLOW ME THE OPPORTUNITY TO LET MY ATTORNEY REVIEW THE DOCUMENTS BEFORE I SIGN.. NO..NO.. NO..HE REPLIED I NEEDED TO EXECUTE THESE DOCUMENTS NOW, OR FACE FORCLOSURE... I REFUSE TO SIGN THE NOTE INDIVISUALLY, NOR PLEDGE PROPERTY IN MY INDIVISUAL NAME, (AIS) AMERICAN INVESTMENT SERVICES ADVANCE FUNDS TO ME FAR BEYOND MY ABILITY TO PAY.(AIS) PLACED MY LOAN IN FORECLOSURE TWO MONTHS AFTER THE ALLEDGED CLOSING OF JUNE 20TH 2006. HERE'S WHERE THE RUBER HIT THE ROAD.. THE CLOSING WAS NEVER COMPLETED, I WALKED OUT, IF I COULDN'T HAVE MY ATTORNEY LOOK OVER THE DOCUMENTS SOMETHING IS WRONG...AND AS MATTERS TURN OUT IT WAS WRONG. (AIS) FILED A FORECLOSURE SUIT AGAINST ME AND TWO OF MY CORPORATIONS.(AIS) FAILED TO RECORD THE MORTGAGE, IT WASN'T UNTIL AFTER TWO YEARS AFTER THE FORCLOSURE FILING (AIS) SOUGHT TO MOTION THE COURT FOR LEAVE TO RECORD THEIR ALLEDGED MORTGAGE. BECAUSE I GOT UP AND WALKED OUT ON THE 10:30PM CLOSING THE MORTGAGE WAS NEVER NOTARIZED.IN A FRAUDULENT ATTEPT TO DEFRAUD THE CLERK OF COURT (AIS) INSTRUCTED THEIR IN HOUSE NOTARY TO SIGN AND NOTARIZE THE MORTGAGE WHICH WAS UNNOTARIZE FOR TWO YEARS. (AIS) DEFRAUDED THE COURTS BY CAUSING THE COURTS TO GRANT (AIS) SUMMARY FINAL JUDGEMENT WHEN (AIS) KNEW THEY LACK STANDINGS BEFORE THE COURT, BECAUSE (AIS) FAILED TO PAY THE STATE TAXES,DOCK STAMPS, INTANGABLE TAXES. WHERE FLORIDA LAW CLEARLY STATES NO COURT CAN ENFORCE A FORCLOSURE ACTION UNLESS THESE TAXES ARE PAID. THAT (AIS) ENTERED INTO A CONTRACT AGREEMENT TI REINSTATE THE EXISTING LOAN, IF I TENDER $ 34,000.00 AND ON 04-04 2007 I DID DELIVER A CASHIER CHECK TO (AIS) SIGNED THE REINSTATEMENT AGREEMENT, BUT FUNNY THING (AIS) DIDN'T SIGN..THEN THREE WEEKS LATER (AIS) MOTION HE COURT TO SET ANOTHER SALE DATE FOR MY HOMESTEAD/COMMERICIAL PROPERTY. UNDER DURESS, UNDER THE FRAUDULENT THREAT OF A COURT HOUSE SALE OF MY PROPRTY, I DELIVERED TO (AIS) ANOTHER $ 82,000.00 EVEN THOUGH THE SUMMARY FINAL JUDGEMENT HE USED TO EXTORT THESE FUNDS FROM ME WAS ACTUALLY MOOT. BECASE THE MORTGAGE HAD NOT AS YET BEEN RECORDED.(AIS) TOOK YET ANOTHER $ 2,100.00 FROM ME. I FINALLY HIRED ANOTHER ATTORNEY WHO MOTION THE COURT TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGEMENT BECAUSE THE COURT LACK SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION IN THIS MATTER,  AS THE REQUIRED TAXES WERE NOT PAID.I WAS FORCED TO FILE BANKRUPTCY TO STOP THE DEC 19TH 2007 SALE OF MY PROPERTY, I HAD ABSOLUTELY NO OTHER CHOICE....NOW THIS FORCLOSURE STARTED IN OCT 2006,AND CONTINUES TODAY.. (AIS) AFTER RECORDING THIER ALLEDGED MORTGAGE THEY RE-MOTION THE COURT FOR SUMMARY FINAL JUDGEMENT.. AND DESPITE A LAUNDRY LIST OF ISSUES OF MATERIAL FACTS, DESPITE OUR AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES, DESPITE (AIS) FRAUD ON THE COURTS, DESPITE THE FACT (AIS) HAD NO ASSIGNMENTS PRIOR TO FILING, DESPITE THE  FACT  (AIS) TOOK $ 130.000.00 FROM ME IN BAD FAITH.. DESPITE MY AFFIDAVIT IN OPPOSITION TO (AIS) SUMMARY JUDGEMENT MOTION, DESPITE THE FACT I DIDN'T SIGNED THE MORTGAGE NOTE,DESPITE THE FACT THE CLOSING ON JUNE 20TH 2006 WASN'T COMPLETED. THE JUDGE GRANTED (AIS) SUMMARY FINAL JUDGEMENT.. UNBELIVERABLE. CS#2006-22291-CA PS. WHILE IN FEDERAL BANKRUPTCY COURT COUNSEL FOR (AIS) MARK KASS, WHO ALSO IS THE SON IN LAW OF THE PRINCIPAL OWNER OF (AIS) DURING A EVIDENARY HEARING ON VIOLATING THE COURTS AUTOMATIC STAY. ATTORNEY KASS WAS CALLED TO THE WITNESS STAND, TO  TESTIFIY ABOUT HIS INVOLVEMENT IN RECORDING (AIS) MORTGAGE WITHOUT FRIST OBTAINING THE COURT'S APPROVAL. ATTORNEY KASS ON FIVE DIFFEREMT OCASSIONS LIED UNDER OATH HE DID NOT RECORD THE MORTGAGE. WHEN IN FACT THE CLERK OF THE COURT ADVISED IN A AFFIDAVIT THAT HE DID.. THIS MATTER IS STILL PENDING WITH THE FLORIDA BAR.LOG ON OUR YOU TUBE SITE CROSSSTREETBROADCAST... MOTGAGE FRAUD.