Dablues
Alamo,#2UPDATE EX-employee responds
Fri, May 16, 2008
Peter you rode the wave as long is as it was going your way and GEORGE KOVAL was singing your praises. I never saw you return a BONUS check during all those "golden boy" years.
Anonymous
Union,#3UPDATE EX-employee responds
Fri, December 21, 2007
Some of the points made may be valid, but the other managers within combined do not send their agents out with photocopied reciepts to give policy holders so the real stubs could be torn at the dm's leisure. Most people would also know that intimidating witnesses, and secluding of witnesses who still worked for you during the civil case, would have an impact on the outcome. (yes slashing tires of investigators and reps of the company would be considered intimidation). And lastly, none of what you did was for the agents benefit. It was for your own ego. The move to Family Heritage was made to ensure your complete control over the group. The 50 agents that followed you from combined had been whittled down to a dozen within 18 months. So who was all of this really done for?
Anonymous
Union,#4UPDATE EX-employee responds
Fri, December 21, 2007
Some of the points made may be valid, but the other managers within combined do not send their agents out with photocopied reciepts to give policy holders so the real stubs could be torn at the dm's leisure. Most people would also know that intimidating witnesses, and secluding of witnesses who still worked for you during the civil case, would have an impact on the outcome. (yes slashing tires of investigators and reps of the company would be considered intimidation). And lastly, none of what you did was for the agents benefit. It was for your own ego. The move to Family Heritage was made to ensure your complete control over the group. The 50 agents that followed you from combined had been whittled down to a dozen within 18 months. So who was all of this really done for?
Anonymous
Union,#5UPDATE EX-employee responds
Fri, December 21, 2007
Some of the points made may be valid, but the other managers within combined do not send their agents out with photocopied reciepts to give policy holders so the real stubs could be torn at the dm's leisure. Most people would also know that intimidating witnesses, and secluding of witnesses who still worked for you during the civil case, would have an impact on the outcome. (yes slashing tires of investigators and reps of the company would be considered intimidation). And lastly, none of what you did was for the agents benefit. It was for your own ego. The move to Family Heritage was made to ensure your complete control over the group. The 50 agents that followed you from combined had been whittled down to a dozen within 18 months. So who was all of this really done for?
Anonymous
Union,#6UPDATE EX-employee responds
Fri, December 21, 2007
Some of the points made may be valid, but the other managers within combined do not send their agents out with photocopied reciepts to give policy holders so the real stubs could be torn at the dm's leisure. Most people would also know that intimidating witnesses, and secluding of witnesses who still worked for you during the civil case, would have an impact on the outcome. (yes slashing tires of investigators and reps of the company would be considered intimidation). And lastly, none of what you did was for the agents benefit. It was for your own ego. The move to Family Heritage was made to ensure your complete control over the group. The 50 agents that followed you from combined had been whittled down to a dozen within 18 months. So who was all of this really done for?
Peter
Coshocton,#7Author of original report
Tue, July 20, 2004
Please do not hesitate to contact your local FBI or IRS Office to prevent yourself from getting into trouble; otherwise, they will not care that you were unaware of breaking any law and that you had no intention of doing so.