- Report: #1396914
Complaint Review: David D White - Phoenix Arizona
-
Author Confirmed
Why?
David D White
3930 E Ray Rd # 150 Phoenix, 85044 Arizona, USA
Phone:
480-664-4900
Web:
http://www.davidwhitefamilylaw.com/
Categories:
Business Rating:
(0)
Tell us has your experience with this business or person been good?
David D, White, David Donald White Esq. DOB: 05/xx/19xx of The Law Offices of David D. White, P.C., 480 664-4900, 480-664-4900, “Shauna R. Miller- Senior Bar Counsel – Litigation, State Bar of Arizona File: 14-3112 Adam Pxxxxxxxxx, Ahwatukee, Chandler, Gilbert Phoenix Arizona
Report Attachments
Before you hire David D. White Esq. read Ripoff Report, do a search for “David D. White”.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Deposition of David Donald White Esq. (December 15, 2015), CV 2014-095953, David D. White and The Law Office Of David D. White, P.C. vs. Brian Vaughn, (Page 109:3 to 109:8)
Q. In connection with each of the Bar complaints that we have discussed, and I believe there are 10 of them at the moment, in each of those instances were (sic) you required to file or submit a written response to the Bar complaint?
A. I think in all but one.
++++++++
To be clear the 10 complaints were over several years, not just 6 months.
The State Bar of Arizona will only disclose how many complaints have been lodged against an attorney in the last 6 months (currently, 2017). They use to disclose that information for a longer period of time (2011).
Is this in the Public’s Best Interest? In my opinion, NO!
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
June 12, 2015
PERSONAL AND CONFIDENTIAL
Geoffrey M. T. Sturr
Osborn Maledon, P.A.
2929 North Central Avenue, Suite 2100
Phoenix, Arizona 85012
Re: File No: 14-3112
Complainant: Adam Pxxxxxxxxx
Your Client: David D. White
Dear Mr. Sturr:
Pursuant to Rule 55(b), Ariz. R. Sup. Ct., the charge filed against you by Mr. Pxxxxxxxxx have been investigated and, upon review by bar counsel, have been dismissed.
Given the Court’s finding that neither your client nor Mr. Pxxxxxxxxx knowingly presented false claims during the post decree proceedings, there is insufficient evidence to prove by clear and convincing evidence that you made intentional misrepresentations in the Petition for Modification of Legal Decision making, Parenting Time and Child Support. An attorney is allowed to rely on information given by a client, but it appears from the documentation in this matter that you had to retract certain statements you made to the court and to others. You are cautioned that relying on a client’s statements without adequate due dalliance may result in an ethical violation.
You are also cautioned about becoming too involved in your clients’ cases. There have been several matters reviewed by the State Bar regarding your professionalism, wherein you have indicated that your behavior towards your clients’ was the product of a friendship that grew out of the representation. It is a conflict of interest to let your relationship with a client cloud your professional judgment. This is to advise you that matters previously dismissed can be reopened if a pattern or course of misconduct emerges.
Pursuant to Rule 53(b)(2), Ariz. R. Sup. Ct., the Complainant may object to this decision within ten (10) days of receipt of the dismissal letter. Any such objection will be referred to the Attorney Discipline Probable Cause Committee for a decision. You will be notified if an objection is filed.
Sincerely,
Shauna R. Miller
Senior Bar Counsel – Litigation
SRM/jld
Report Attachments
