lanzones
Chicago,#2Author of original report
Thu, February 09, 2012
ConcernedCitizen,
A synopsis is not really a review. A review is not only descriptive, it is also evaluative.
Certification for book reviewing does not exist, but some would consider librarians, academics, specialists and others to come the closest to such certification. You certainly do not have to be in any of those categories to review. Anyone can easily do it. I think however, that there should be a minimum expectation of an endeavor for it to be considered acceptable.
Some of my expectations would be that the reviewer has access to the entire content of what is reviewed. A reviewer should have the ability to rate an item fair or poor, and not just good or better. A reviewer would spend more than 5-9 minutes researching the book and writing the review. The review would be signed so that the reader could assess the reviewer. A review would be dated. The reviewer follows a minimal process of inquiry, evaluation, and disclosure, and not a hasty, assembly line method.
None of these criteria seem to be followed by the company in question. The simple fact that the company does not permit a one or two star rating is misrepresentation that disqualifies them as a legitimate reviewer.
concernedcitizen
Saint Louis,#3Consumer Comment
Wed, February 08, 2012
What constitutes a review other than being a quick synopsis of the opinion of the person who looks at the book? It's understandable that minute reviewers do not have certification as official book reviewers. A certification in minute book reviewing is unofficial certification of reading an entire book.