Sistermarylitigation
Clinton Twp,#2REBUTTAL Owner of company
Fri, May 24, 2013
Here is a link to the State of Michigan document which was hacked from this ripoffreport.
Note that Paul Nicoletti alliance with PIO Masonry (Sal Viviano) which was the opposing party in the Drelich lawsuit in Judge Edward Servitto's court !
Sal Viviano was then arrested for an habitual drug charge, and Judge Servitto's prosecutor son, Micheal Servitto appeared in the Diane Druzinski court only for the sentencing and argued for a 7411 which suppressed the file, and gave Sal probation which he violated, and both Prosecutor Eric Smith and Judge Druzinski were notified of the probation violation, and the violation was ignored.
http://www.ripoffreport.com/d/2e1c5637-07b7-42f8-b1d4-2cdd48a0e1f7_thumb/NicolettiPIOStofMI0001.jpg
Sistermarylitigation
Clinton Twp,#3Consumer Comment
Sat, January 19, 2013
This story was reported in the Metro Times parts 1 & 2, as well as a follow up
The case: 2001-005492-CK VIVIANO, SALVATORE; Viviano Construction vs. DREILICH, ROLAND was in the Hon. Edward Servitto Court even though Viviano Construction was an non-existent entity, and was unlicensed so it did not have the capacity to sue. The State of Michigan then held disciplinary proceedings against Sal Viviano who was licensed in another capacity.
Nightmare on Highbury Court
Part 1 (12/12/07):
http://www.metrotimes.com/editorial/story.asp?id=12113
Nightmare on Highbury Court
Part 2 (12/26/07):
http://metrotimes.com/editorial/story.asp?id=12113
NOTE: The unnamed Judge who gave Sal Viviano a 7411 which suppressed the file and gave him probation instead of jail time is Judge Diane Druzinski of Macomb County Circuit Court.
It was Judge Edward Servitto's son, Prosecutor Micheal Servitto who argued for the 7411 who appeared only for the sentencing even though he was neither the prosecutor assigned to the case, nor the prosecutor assigned to the Druzinski court.
Nightmares Twist (6/25/08):
http://www2.metrotimes.com/editorial/story.asp?id=13022
Sistermarylitigation
Clinton Twp,#4Consumer Comment
Sun, June 17, 2012
Paul Nicoletti represented the bricklayer, Sal Viviano as Pio Masonry in Judge Rudy Nichols
court in Oakland County. On September 4, 2003, in another Oakland county case involving the same attorney Paul Nicoletti and bricklayer , Viviano/PIO who exploits illegals, the Nicolettis client was put in a room with Judge Rudy Nichols. Nicoletti said Hi Rudy, and then Rudy who in his robe exclaimed ANARCHY! and dont let a 3rd party (a jury) determine your fate. Nicoletti then said I wont let this settlement fail.
See this
Ripoffreport and photos of the brickwork
http://www.ripoffreport.com/lawyers/attorneys-paul-nicol/attorneys-paul-nicoletti-john-ae0b3.htm
Oakland Circuit
Court
2004-061797-CK PIO Masonry v JRH.
Judy Rudy Nichols
PIOs attorney, Paul Nicoletti filed State of MI documents on behalf of PIO/Sal Viviano.
Paul Nicoletti
Bloomfield Hills,#5REBUTTAL Individual responds
Wed, February 29, 2012
The posting by Roland from Shelby, is really from Marie Dreilich. The posting was done under the name of Roland Dreilich, her husband. The posting is false and baseless for the reasons set forth below:
1. The Dreilichs were former clients of mine. When they retained me and my firm they had previously been through a series of lawyers, with whom they had fallouts with each one of them. The case was entitled Viviano Construction, Inc. et al. vs. Roland and Marie Dreilich, Case No. 00-0171-CK, Macomb County Circuit Court. Although the case was filed on 1/13/00, it was not until 1/7/02, that I became involved. The court record that can be viewed online at http://macombcountymi.gov/pa/ indicates that prior to my involvement there were 7 pages of docket entries. Less than 3 weeks later, on 1/28/02, I withdrew from representing the Dreilichs after i discovered they had lied to me and tried to hide crucial documents that revealed the true status of the case. On 3/12/02 trial was held and a judgment of foreclosure was entered against the Dreilichs in the amount of $45,619.63.
2. On 11/21/03 Paul Nicoletti filed a request for issuance of a Personal Protection Order (PPO) against Marie Dreilich, Case No. 2003-686859-PH, Oakland County Circuit Court, following Dreilich's illegal entry into the residence of Paul Nicoletti, posing as a potential real estate broker. To view the docket entries see: http://www.oakgov.com/crts0004/main. The PPO was issued by the court and entered into the lein system. On 5/26/04 Dreilich was charged with violating the PPO and arrested and sent to jail. Again on 6/30/04 Dreilich violated the PPO and was found in contempt and sentenced to jail. Dreilich appealed her convictions to the Court of Appeals, where the appeals were denied.
3. The Dreilichs placed blame for the way the foregoing case turned out upon their subsequent lawyer, Timothy Pierce. The Dreilichs sued Mr. Pierce for legal malpractice on 3/1/04, Case No. 2004-000867-NM, Marie Dreilich v. Timothy Pierce, Macomb County Circuit Court.
4. Again on 3/21/05, the Dreilichs tried to further delay the eviction proceedings by filing Case No. 2005-001136-CH, Dreilichs v. Viviano, Macomb County Circuit Court. This case was ended by the entry of a consent judgment on 12/18/06. The consent judgment provided that the Dreilichs would surrender the home and vacate the property. After that the Dreilichs tried to renege on the settlement by filing a series of motions for rehearing and appeals, to no avail.
5. On 12/22/04, in Case No. 2004-702059-PH, Nicoletti v. Dreilich, Oakland County Circuit Court, the PPO entered against Dreilich was renewed and extended until 12/22/07.
6. In a desperate attempt to keep possession of the home, despite the entry of a consent judgment, the Dreilichs filed what amount to liens upon the property in an attempt to cloud title. With this illegal act, Dreilich was charged with not one, but six felonies under MCL 600.2907A2. See People v. Dreilich, Case No. 2006-000512-FH. On 6/9/06 Dreilich pled guilty as charged and officially became a convicted felon in the State of Michigan. On 8/16/06 Dreilich tried to revoke her plea, which was denied. A year later on 8/9/07, Dreilich was charged with violating her probation. On 11/17/08 Dreilich's motion to overturn her criminal felony conviction was denied.
7. The Dreilichs were divorced on 12/20/10, Case No. 2010-006069-DO.
8. In an attempt to stall the eviction proceedings indicated above, the Dreilichs filed for bankruptcy in February of 2011, Case No. 11-42352-WSD.
The time has come for Roland & Marie Dreilich, to take responsibility for their own actions. The pattern of placing blame on their attorneys, judges, prosecutors, and others, evidences the deep seated mental disturbances from which they both suffer.
In closing, although Paul Nicoletti was frivolously named as a party in Case No. 2005-070592-CZ, Fifth Third Bank v. Robert Hance, on 3/16/2009 the court entered an order dismissing Paul Nicoletti, his wife, his title company, and his Law Firm of Nicoletti & Associates. Being named as a party was meaningless based upon the entry of the orders of dismissal, which evidence the fact that they were vindicated of all alleged wrong doings.
Paul Nicoletti has been licensed to practice law since 1991. Since being licensed, Paul Nicoletti has never been disciplined by the Attorney Grievance Board nor has he ever had a grievance investigated. If the Dreilichs had a valid complaint, it would have been investigated by the Attorney Grievance Board.
If you have any questions or comments, I would welcome you to contact me at your convenience. My number is (248) 203-7800 or feel free to email me at [email protected]. Thank you for taking the time to read my response.