Direct retorts to the claim and comment.  Not based on ANY credible evidence, merely an attempted destruction of my reputation.

____________________________________

Elite Professional- correct, both the owner of Power FX and myself have had numerous awards won at professional organizations in Canada and the US for fitness and bodybuilding

Fitness trainers and coaches - always advertised as coaches. nutritional and fitness routine coaching and motivation.  Never advertised as nutritionist, dr, or any liable term thereof.

they will take your money upfront - of course, all trainers, coaches, dieticians, and service companies request upfront payment as individuals do not pay after the fact.  You don't go into a store and use a product, then pay for it.  All monies were credited directly to Power FX with signed recognition from the client. 

give you false health information and improper training methods - coaching based on scientifically and experientially proven techniques and proven standards in the industry.  Results vary dependant on individual, their own personal health concerns and commitment to the program.

they do not own or rent a fitness studio or training facility to train their clients - A facility was rented for personal one on one instruction for a 6 month term after which point no more personal instruction was provided.  The program has been and always was an online coaching and motivational program, again, all waivers that were signed off on by the client.

instead they use the local gym where they are members at and pretend that you are their workout partner so the local gym employees don't kick them out.- incorrect, on on one coaching only ever took place at the one rented location.  There are is no unethical behaviour in attending my personal training gym with my friends with whom I give tips to and workout with on occassion with no money exchanged.  It's called being a friend and gym partner.

she is a user- personal attack; defamation and lible

seller for anabolic steroids - incorrect and unsubstantiated claim, unsupported and unreported information to the police or any other authority.  personal attack; defamation and lible

her and her partner are scammers.- personal attack; defamation and lible

she doesn't own a training or fitness studio - correct, it isn't necessary, I provided online coaching.  And any general Trainer also does not own their own gym/studio.  Rediculous claim.

ALL files on ALL clients have been kept on file and accessible with

all emails and correspondance made to all clients as fair, just,

appreciated and welcomed in terms of all lawful services provided

through Power Fx. All clients signed waivers. All clients signed

medical reports. All clients knew the ONLINE nature of the coaching

facilitation of the program. All business dealings have been fair and

just. There is NO evidence to prove otherwise.

The rediculous nature of the Claims made on this website are

Unsubstantiated. NO reports have been filed in Canada. NO reports

have gone to the police. NO reports have been filed with the Better

Business Bureau.

This claim and further comment by two individuals who have no claim,

stake or interest in this matter (as they are not clients, the names

are not within the roster) is FALSE and FRAUDULENT. This is

evidently a personal attack against me and has done harm to me both

personally and professionally. The claim made has no evidence to back

up any involvement of any criminal activity and needs to be removed by

the posters immediately.

In the event that these two individuals ARE former online clients, the

fact that they are using aliases and have not made any reports in our

home Country Explicity Proves that there is NO credibility to their

claims.

Any further defamatory statements will be held liable against both

individuals in a court of Law in Ontario. Charges WILL be saught.

Defamation law in Ontario

While the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms1 guarantees the

right of freedom of expression, this right has always been of a

limited nature. One of those limitations can be found in Ontario

legislation through the Libel and Slander Act (the "Act")2, which

prohibits the dissemination of defamatory comments, specifically,

spoken or written words that discredit an individual in the estimation

of right-thinking members of society generally.

Defamation is defined in Black's Law Dictionary3 as:

The act of harming the reputation of another by making a false

statement to a third person…A false written or oral statement that

damages another's reputation.4

More specifically, a defamatory statement is defined as:

A statement that tends to injure the reputation of a person referred

to in it. The statement is likely to lower that person in the

estimation of reasonable people and in particular to cause that person

to be regarded with feelings of hatred, contempt, ridicule, fear, or

dislike.5

Libel

The first portion of the Act deals with libel. Section 2 of the Act

states that "defamatory words in a newspaper or in a broadcast shall

be deemed to be published and to constitute libel". Given the nature

of editorial and opinion pieces, many defamation actions for libel are

focused on newspaper articles which are alleged to have disparaged,

directly or indirectly, the subject of the article. In short, libel

refers to written defamatory statements.

Proving a Claim in Libel and/or Slander

In order to initiate a claim of libel or slander in an action for

defamation, the allegations must prove the following:

i) The statements must be made to a third party. Where a statement has

been made and no one has read it aside from the individual,

organization or corporation about which the statement has been made,

the statement cannot be considered libellous;

ii) The statements must be made specifically about individual,

corporation or organization in question. It must be reasonably

inferred that the statement that was published could reasonably be

inferred to be discussing to or referring to that individual,

corporation or organization.

iii) Finally, the statement made must be considered defamatory, i.e.

the statement must be false and disparages the reputation of the

individual, corporation or organization.

CONCLUSION

The Libel and Slander Act is a powerful legislative tool to protect

the victims of unscrupulous statements made by individuals that can

injure or discredit that person or organization's reputation.

http://www.carters.ca/pub/bulletin/charity/2007/chylb125.htm

I am neither a client of Power FX, nor of Edyta Easnor, however I do have both extensive personal and professional knowledge of Edyta's ethics, fitness and nutritional knowledge, and professionalism. I am also an athlete with a great deal of training and nutritional knowledge, who has trained and eaten alongside Edyta.

Edyta's knowledge of nutrition and fitness is based on sound scientificly researched standards and this is from which she directs both clients, other professionals, and personal friends in their fitness and nutritional goals. To claim otherwise, as the reporters have, only discredits their personal opinion and would lead one to assume that their claims are nothing more the petty personal attacks.

To report that Ms. Easnor is using, has used, or supplies illicit proformance enhancers for her personal gains or those of her clients, peers, or friends, without any form of presentable evidence, is nothing more than a liability tort. If there were any credence to the defamers' claims then they should seek out proper criminal proceeding in relations to their claims. Observing that they have not proceeded through proper and reasonable legal chanels, only furthers their lack of said credibility in their claims.

Ms. Edyta Easnor's ethics, in both her personal and professional life, are ones of hard work, honesty, and truthfulness in obtaining forward momentum for her family, friends, and clients. She acts upon these standards in her private and professional life and instills these ethics on all those who come into contact with her. 

Truthfully and respectfully

Randall

ALL files on ALL clients have been kept on file and accessible with all emails and correspondance made to all clients as fair, just, appreciated and welcomed in terms of all lawful services provided through Power Fx.  All clients signed waivers.  All clients signed medical reports.  All clients knew the ONLINE nature of the coaching facilitation of the program.  All business dealings have been fair and just.  There is NO evidence to prove otherwise.

The rediculous nature of the Claims made on this website are Unsubstantiated.  NO reports have been filed in Canada.  NO reports have gone to the police.  NO reports have been filed with the Better Business Bureau. 

This claim and further comment by two individuals who have no claim, stake or interest in this matter (as they are not clients, the names are not within the roster) is FALSE and FRAUDULENT.   This is evidently a personal attack against me and has done harm to me both personally and professionally.  The claim made has no evidence to back up any involvement of any criminal activity and needs to be removed by the posters immediately.

In the event that these two individuals ARE former online clients, the fact that they are using aliases and have not made any reports in our home Country Explicity Proves that there is NO credibility to their claims. 

Any further defamatory statements will be held liable against both individuals in a court of Law in Ontario.  Charges WILL be saught. 

Defamation law in Ontario

While the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms¹ guarantees the right of freedom of expression, this right has always been of a limited nature. One of those limitations can be found in Ontario legislation through the Libel and Slander Act (the "Act")², which prohibits the dissemination of defamatory comments, specifically, spoken or written words that discredit an individual in the estimation of right-thinking members of society generally.

Defamation is defined in Black's Law Dictionary³ as:

The act of harming the reputation of another by making a false statement to a third person…A false written or oral statement that damages another's reputation.⁴

More specifically, a defamatory statement is defined as:

A statement that tends to injure the reputation of a person referred to in it. The statement is likely to lower that person in the estimation of reasonable people and in particular to cause that person to be regarded with feelings of hatred, contempt, ridicule, fear, or dislike.⁵

Libel

The first portion of the Act deals with libel. Section 2 of the Act states that "defamatory words in a newspaper or in a broadcast shall be deemed to be published and to constitute libel". Given the nature of editorial and opinion pieces, many defamation actions for libel are focused on newspaper articles which are alleged to have disparaged, directly or indirectly, the subject of the article. In short, libel refers to written defamatory statements.

Proving a Claim in Libel and/or Slander

In order to initiate a claim of libel or slander in an action for defamation, the allegations must prove the following:

i) The statements must be made to a third party. Where a statement has been made and no one has read it aside from the individual, organization or corporation about which the statement has been made, the statement cannot be considered libellous;

ii) The statements must be made specifically about individual, corporation or organization in question. It must be reasonably inferred that the statement that was published could reasonably be inferred to be discussing to or referring to that individual, corporation or organization.

iii) Finally, the statement made must be considered defamatory, i.e. the statement must be false and disparages the reputation of the individual, corporation or organization.

CONCLUSION

The Libel and Slander Act is a powerful legislative tool to protect the victims of unscrupulous statements made by individuals that can injure or discredit that person or organization's reputation.

http://www.carters.ca/pub/bulletin/charity/2007/chylb125.htm

Based on the two paragraphs listed below taken directly from the Ripoff website, it it evident to see why the false and unsubstantiated personal attack was made using this medium, and was Not Allowed to be Filed Anywhere in Canada, becuase of the fact that they contain False and Inaccurate Information.

_________________________________________________________________

Because Ripoff Report is based in the United States and we have no

assets outside the U.S., so any foreign judgment against us would be

worthless until the plaintiff brings the judgment here and asks a U.S.

court to honor and enforce it.

Because the reports on Ripoff Report are authored by users of the

site, we cannot be legally regarded as the "publisher or speaker" of

the reports contained here, and hence we are not liable for reports

even if they contain false or inaccurate information

1. neither of the two parties making a claim against my person or the company I was involved with represent any client on the Power Fx roster of clients.  No services were ever rendered to either party as stated. 

2. the author needs to provide formal proof that the transaction/event really happened

3. this is an unsubstantiated claim and a Direct personal unsubstantiated attack