Larry
Tucson,#2Consumer Comment
Thu, July 21, 2005
Mr. Reese had his day in court to defend himself. He chose to allow a default judgment to be entered against him rather than assert the ridiculous claims that Robert now raises. By failing to appear in court, Mr. Reese has, in effect, admitted that all the allegations against him were true. The time and place to dispute the facts was in the trial court, not here.
Robert
Atlanta,#3UPDATE Employee
Thu, July 21, 2005
On behalf of Mr. Robert Reese, and Ormolu.com I would Like to comment on the above accusations. Mr. Reese has over 20 years of packing, shipping and selling Fine, Fragile antiques. His Reputation is well known among high-end buyers within the US and all over the world. His website is sucessful due to his large client base of repeat customers. Mr. Reese carefully chooses the highest quality packing products for his company. He pays for the shipment of each item himself so that he can select only the finest shipping companies worldwide. He also chooses the quickest method of shipping regardless of its cost, placing a high value on his customer service. In all of the thousands of Marble items, Fragile furniture, Glass, Ormolu items he has shippied, this reported incident was the fist impossible breakage. These urns I personally witnessed, and would have to had been hit with a large object, or dropped for the top of a building to break. They were packaged extremely well. Mr. Reese would have gladly taken a return to please the client, and given a full refund for the customer changing his mind. But... surely, this man could not expect the company to take a loss due to his mishandling of the item. If a package is damaged, it is the customers responsibility to refuse the package, or alert the shipper prior to accepting it. Thank God there are so many loyal clients who are extemely grateful to Mr. Reese for his epertise in locating these rare museum quality pieces. These wonderful clients continue to show their loyalty and patronage to this day. It is unfortunate that this man was unhappy to the point of damaging an item rather than using honesty to return his purchase.