W.
Washington,#2Consumer Suggestion
Wed, December 29, 2010
Lemon Law applies to brand new vehicles from the manufacturer and NOT a used car. He could have avoided all of this by just taking the car to a trusted mechanic, or a mobile mechanic that specializes in inspections (I've used them for EVERY car I've purchased) and he would have known about all of this damage. The LAST person you should think is looking out for your interests is the salesperson that is trying to sell to you and make money! Then of course there is the issue of why he is buying a Corvette when the only income he has is Soc Sec...
jdollblu1
phoenix,#3Author of original report
Sun, October 10, 2010
I understand exactly what you r saying. However they stated the car has never been in an accident and the mechanics said it was in for for sure by the condition of the frame. I know they took advantage of him, but there is also a such thing as a Lemon Law. Im not quite sure but I think the car is to old to qualify. My dad handled everything. I wish I would have been there. In response to him buying a car he could not afford he gave them money he saved for this, cash money, with a small monthly payment he could afford. It is the principle of the whole thing. The dealership had the car for 2 months, 1 month, 2 weeks it is ridiculous. There should be something that could help him. I cant believe there is nothing to protect consumers from this kind of situation?
Ronny g
North hollywood,#4Consumer Comment
Sun, October 10, 2010
It really does not matter which dealership you buy a used car from, or what type of car..if you by it "as-is" you buy it without a warranty.
The only legal recourse, is if there was any false advertising you can present (such as the ad misrepresented the vehicle or it is a different vehicle altogehter), or if any type of warranty is in writing.
Apparently your dad lost the case because he purchased the Corvette as-is. Once you sign to this, the dealer has no obligation to fix anything. If this car had a cracked frame and destroyed suspension and stripped axle and was unsafe..why did he buy the car ?
I don't want to come off as belittling or condescending, but if this report is going to help anyone else avoid the same fate..they just need to understand what "buyer beware" means..ESPECIALLY with an "as-is" used car. The dealers sell these "as-is" without a warranty because they want these heaps off the lot. Honestly, no one forced him to buy it. It might have been a good idea to have the car checked first by a mechanic before signing anything.
Jim
Orlando,#5Consumer Comment
Sun, October 10, 2010
He bought the car "AS IS". No matter how bad the car is, it all comes back to an "AS IS" purchase. He did not and does not have a legal leg to stand on. If the dealer provided some type of written condition report and the actual condition was different, then this would be another matter. He went to court "naked", that is...without an attorney. An attorney would have advised him of what it means to buy a car "AS IS" and would have steered him away from court as it would be a waste of money.
The lender's ONLY responsibility is to finance the purchase. The fact that he has a piece of junk is not material. Their only area of involvement is providing financing and your father repaying that loan.
You mentioned two interesting points. "...he did not have an attorney because he could not afford one..." and "...and on SS income". If he is in such dire financial condition then perhaps buying this car was not the best decision in the first place.
There is no point of wasting time with the media. It all boils down to a fine point. Your father bought a car "AS IS" and had problems with the car. You make no mention if he had his mechanic check this car out in advance of purchase. Your father went to court without an attorney to try to fight a case he had zero chance of winning. Paying the defendant's legal fees is not unusual for the looser. End of story!