Stick
Phoenix,#2Consumer Comment
Thu, December 14, 2006
www.superiorcourt.maricopa.gov/docket/civil/caseInfo.asp?caseNumber=CV2006-018146 state revenue www.superiorcourt.maricopa.gov/docket/civil/caseInfo.asp?caseNumber=TX2006-050086 www.superiorcourt.maricopa.gov/docket/civil/caseInfo.asp?caseNumber=CV2004-024192 Many defendants in this one, can't say who was right or wrong, but look at this one www.superiorcourt.maricopa.gov/docket/civil/caseInfo.asp?caseNumber=CV2001-016753 this one somebody and to pay some CASH out www.superiorcourt.maricopa.gov/docket/civil/caseInfo.asp?caseNumber=TJ2001-000005
Armando
Phoenix,#3Consumer Suggestion
Thu, December 14, 2006
The Federal Trade Commission and Arizona Attorney General's office filed actions last week: http://www.azag.gov/press_releases/dec/2006/TheResultsGroup.pdf "Attorney General Terry Goddard today announced that his office has filed suit against The Results Group (TRG) and its managers, Edward Longoria and Amber Halvorson, alleging that their work-at-home business opportunity scheme violated the Arizona Consumer Fraud Act." http://www.ftc.gov/opa/2006/12/falsehopes.htm The Results Group Working out of a boiler room in Phoenix, the operation charged between $99 and $599 to build and host Web sites affiliated with the Web sites of Fortune 500 retail companies such as Amazon.com and Overstock.com. Consumers would make money when those retailers paid commissions for sales made through the consumers' Web sites. In fact, the large retailers were unaware of any such affiliation, and consumers made no money. The FTC charged that the operation falsely represented that purchasers would receive substantial income as well as substantial assistance from an expert staff, and used false and misleading statements to encourage consumers to buy the business opportunity.