Mike
River Edge,#2Consumer Comment
Tue, August 07, 2007
If your husbands account had so much money in it, why didn't you use that money instead of basically committing fraud by knowingly overdrawing your account?
Dave
Jacksonville,#3Consumer Comment
Tue, August 07, 2007
First of all, I hate Wachovia and closed my accounts with over a year ago because of their underhanded tactics, however, in this case, they were correct in taking your husband's money. It does clearly state that they can use whatever accounts necessary that are in your name to fund another account should that account become negative. In this case, it was probably the left hand not knowing what the right hand was doing. All banks will do this. It's pretty much the only way they can recoup money owed to them.
Bookkeeper31411
Savannah,#4Consumer Comment
Mon, August 06, 2007
I agree with you. You make agreements with Wachovia to resolve the situation in a very professional manner and Wachovia blind sides you. And to add insult Wachovia has professional responders post negative responses to our complaints. Only when Congress gets out of the lobbyist's pockets will this abuse stop. Beware of the professinal responders they are only there to discredit the consumers who are tired of being ripped off.
Duane
Monroe,#5Consumer Comment
Sat, July 14, 2007
....you were the one robbing Peter to pay Paul - not Wachovia. Wachovia has every right to do exactly what they have done. You cannot reasonably expect that it is OK to drive account 'A' into a huge negative, alll the while keeping your money in account 'B'. Read your account agreement that you signed when you opened up the accounts, it will have information on what Wachovia can do. You got off pretty easy if they gave you back $280.00 in fees.