- Report: #1055050
Complaint Review: ((REDACTED BASED ON FINDINGS VIA COURT ORDER)) - Hawaii Internet
-
Author Not Confirmed
Why?
((REDACTED BASED ON FINDINGS VIA COURT ORDER))
Hawaii Hawaii, Internet, USA
Web:
N/A
Categories:
Business Rating:
(0)
Tell us has your experience with this business or person been good?
SPECIFIC INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS REPORT WAS FOUND TO BE FALSE/DEFAMATORY BY A COURT. OUT OF RESPECT FOR THE JUDICIAL PROCESS, THE SPECIFIC INFORMATION THAT WAS FOUND FALSE/DEFAMATORY BY THE COURT HAS BEEN ((REDACTED BASED ON FINDINGS VIA COURT ORDER)) | ((REDACTED BASED ON FINDINGS VIA COURT ORDER)). ((REDACTED BASED ON FINDINGS VIA COURT ORDER))
Editor’s Note: The law protects and encourages Ripoff Report to make appropriate edits to Reports posted by third parties. Ripoff Report may use that editorial power to post findings from a court of law about the subject matter of Reports. In some cases, a Court may find that specific statements made by the author of a Ripoff Report are false and defamatory. When both sides of a dispute appear and contest the facts of a situation in court it is believed that the findings of the court are generally reliable and fair. Out of respect for the courts and the judicial process, Ripoff Report, upon request, may post that kind of finding with special prominence, and in some cases, may even redact the information specifically identified by the court as false from the original Report. In this instance, the Court Order combined with additional formal court documents received by Ripoff Report was specific enough regarding the statements made, and as such, the offending language has been (((REDACTED BASED ON FINDINGS VIA COURT ORDER))) by Ripoff Report.NOTE:Statements that have not been redacted may not have been specifically outlined in the Court Order and/or may have been considered statements of opinion. It is highly encouraged that consumers conduct their own additional research, from credible sources such as regulating authorities, prior to making any decisions on whether or not to do business with any individual or entity named as the information contained herein, and any negative inference derived from such information, may very well be false and misleading.
NOW TO THE EDITORIALLY REDACTED REPORT:
----------------------------------------------------------
((REDACTED BASED ON FINDINGS VIA COURT ORDER)) is actually ((REDACTED BASED ON FINDINGS VIA COURT ORDER)). He uses the alias ((REDACTED BASED ON FINDINGS VIA COURT ORDER)) and claims to be a music producer for The Cure and other maintream bands. He isn't. He and his girl ((REDACTED BASED ON FINDINGS VIA COURT ORDER)) are ((REDACTED BASED ON FINDINGS VIA COURT ORDER)). ((REDACTED BASED ON FINDINGS VIA COURT ORDER)).
((REDACTED BASED ON FINDINGS VIA COURT ORDER)). He ((REDACTED BASED ON FINDINGS VIA COURT ORDER)). ((REDACTED BASED ON FINDINGS VIA COURT ORDER)). He and ((REDACTED BASED ON FINDINGS VIA COURT ORDER)) ((REDACTED BASED ON FINDINGS VIA COURT ORDER)). He ((REDACTED BASED ON FINDINGS VIA COURT ORDER)). He has ((REDACTED BASED ON FINDINGS VIA COURT ORDER)).
((REDACTED BASED ON FINDINGS VIA COURT ORDER)). ((REDACTED BASED ON FINDINGS VIA COURT ORDER)). He ((REDACTED BASED ON FINDINGS VIA COURT ORDER)). ((REDACTED BASED ON FINDINGS VIA COURT ORDER)). ((REDACTED BASED ON FINDINGS VIA COURT ORDER)). They ((REDACTED BASED ON FINDINGS VIA COURT ORDER)).
