;
  • Report:  #334703

Complaint Review: Cerma Technology Inc. - Staceyville Internet

Reported By:
- whitewright, Texas,
Submitted:
Updated:

Cerma Technology Inc.
www.cermatechnology.com Staceyville, Internet, U.S.A.
Web:
N/A
Tell us has your experience with this business or person been good? What's this?
Public Notice:

Hello, I wanted to let all consumers know that Cerma Organic International the makers of Cermax branded products, Has had our products and name taken by Cerma technology, inc. of Staceyville IA and that any products you see on their site is stolen technology and most likely not the same product that they are saying it is in their testimonials section.

Cerma Organic has a patent pending on the product Cermax, and trademarks for the Cermax, cerma, stm-3 logos used by this web site cermatechnology.com although they do not have rights to use or sell any of the above products.

I have worked for 8 years and spent well over 1.6 mil dallors proving the products we make , just to have some person steal it ? Then to proceed to tell people that I am the crook..

My advise to anyone starting a business ! Don't trust anyone!! this company was an authorized dealer for my products until the USPTO (patent office) published my patent once this guy read the patent he decided he could make the same product and did not need to deal with me? Thanks Patent procedures, I did everything by the book and look what it gets me...

know I am faced with a $100.000.00 lawsuit to protect what I thought I had already protected, What a system we have for inventors today.

Be careful when dealing with such web sites as you may get more than you bargained for in the way of bad products not legally produced, and not what was tested, reported on data sheets, and definitely not insured if it hurts your equipment.

Cermax branded products are legally produced and offered by Cermastore.com

No need to take a chance on knock offs, buy products that are legal. Their are no shortcuts to quality...

Gotripped

whitewright, Texas

U.S.A.


2 Updates & Rebuttals

pissed off!

San Diego,
California,
United States of America
Finally, the system worked!

#2Consumer Comment

Tue, June 08, 2010





IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION



NO. C 08-03608 JW










 



                         

JUDGMENT AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION



         Motor Works, LLC



 



          Plaintiff, v.



                   





         Safer Technologies, Inc., et al.,
        
Defendants.


 



 



                    This action was tried on the facts without a jury, a jury having been waived by both parties.



 



        The Court stated its findings of facts and conclusions of law on the record after the close of the



 



        evidence, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 52(a), and invited the parties to submit



 



        briefing with respect to any other matters.  On June 8, 2010, the Court made and filed its



 



        Supplemental Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law.  Based upon its findings, judgment is



 



        entered as follows:



 



                    The Court declares that Plaintiff Motor Works, LLC a Nevada corporation is the owner of



 



        the CERMA family of trademarks, including CERMA, CERMA LUBRICATION, CERMAX,



 



        CERMA ENGINE LUBE, CERMA LUBE, CERMA ADVANCED LUBRICATION



 



        TECHNOLOGY, CERMA ORGANIC (hereinafter referred to as the CERMA family of



 



        trademarks).



 



                    Defendants Safer Technologies, Inc., Cerma Technology, Inc., George Ackerson and their



 



        respective officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys and all those persons in active concert



 



        or participation with them:










Case5:08-cv-03608-JW   Document109    Filed06/08/10   Page2 of 4



 



 



 



 



                  (1)        Are permanently enjoined and restrained from using any of the CERMA



 



                              family of trademarks or any confusingly similar trademark, trade name



 



                              component or otherwise, to market, advertise or identify Defendants products



 



                              in the United States;



 



                  (2)        Shall cease use of any and all materials developed in connection with the



 



                              advertising, promotion and marketing of Plaintiffs products including but not



 



                              limited to customer testimonials, photographs, text, test and performance data,



 



                              including but not limited to:  (a) the website cermatechnology.com, (b) any



 



                              telephone number including the pneumonic CERMA (or any variation



 



                                thereof) in the United States;



 



                    (3)        Shall cease making any representations concerning the content or quality of



 



                                the products of Plaintiff and its licensees in the United States;



 



                    (4)        Within 10 days of the date of this Judgment, shall deliver to Plaintiff or declare under



 



                                oath that they have destroyed all products, literature, advertising and other material



 



                                bearing CERMA family of trademarks or any confusingly similar trademarks the



 



                                infringing designation;



 



                    (5)        Within 10 days of the date of this Judgment, shall deliver to Plaintiff and lodge a



 



                                copy with the Court a notarized assignment to Plaintiff of:  (a) any and all state or



 



                                federal registrations or application for registration of the CERMA family of



 



                                trademarks issued to Defendants or pending from them; (b) documents necessary to



 



                                transfer ownership and control or the website cermatechnology.com and any other



 



                                websites delivered by Plaintiff or its representatives to any Defendant; (c) documents



 



                                necessary to transfer ownership and control to Plaintiffs all telephone numbers with



 



                                the pneumonic CERMA or any variation thereof held or controlled by Defendants;



 



                    (6)        Within 10 days of the date of this Judgment, shall deliver to Plaintiff at Plaintiffs



 



                                principal place of business or such other location as Plaintiff shall designate all



 



 



 



                                                                                        2










Case5:08-cv-03608-JW   Document109    Filed06/08/10   Page3 of 4



 



 



 



 



                              equipment, including but not limited to bottling machines provided by Plaintiff to



 



                              Defendants;



 



                  (7)        Within 10 days of this Judgment shall provide to Plaintiff and lodge a copy with the



 



                              Court an accounting of any and all profits of Defendants from sales of products using



 



                              the CERMA family of trademarks.



 



                  Because no relief was requested with respect to the corporate name, nothing in this Order



 



      shall be construed to require that Defendants cease doing business under the corporate name Cerma



 



      Technology, Inc.  Furthermore, nothing in this Judgment shall be construed to prevent Defendants



 



      from purchasing and selling products from BYK-Chemie GmbH or any of its distributors in the



 



        United States.



 



                    Defendants shall take nothing by way of their counterclaim.



 



                    Based on the Courts finding that the following Defendants are not liable for the actions of



 



        Defendants Safer Technologies, Inc., and Cerma Technology, Inc., judgment is entered in favor of



 



        Defendants Mary Stranahan, Nicholas Streit, and Edward Halbach against Plaintiff Motor Works,



 



        LLC.  Plaintiff shall take nothing from these named Defendants.  As between each of them and



 



        Plaintiff, each party shall bear his or her own costs, respectively.



 



                    Plaintiff has not sought attorneys fees as a sanction pursuant to the Courts March 10, 2010



 



        Order.  Otherwise, each side shall bear their own attorney fees.  Plaintiff shall recover its costs of



 



        suit.



 



                    The Clerk shall close this file.



 



 



 



        Dated:  June 8, 2010








 



 



 



 



 



 



 



 



 



 



 



                                                                                        3






JAMES WARE



United States District Judge









-->

Well almost 3 years later Motor Works  gets our name back!

in 2008 our product Cermax was taken from us one of our vendors, Now we have a court order giving us back what has always been our's . It cost a ton of money to prove we are the legal owner of Cermatechnology.com, Cermax brand, and we are the original product makers of all cerma branded products. Now you can purchase the real original Ceramic engine treatment without having to worry if it is the real stuff as reported in the data within any website.

Cermatechnology is back where it belongs, with the real owners. Selling the real patent pending formulation of Cermax, Cerma.

Cerma Technology, Inc.




IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION



NO. C 08-03608 JW










 



                         

JUDGMENT AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION



         Motor Works, LLC



 



          Plaintiff, v.



                   





         Safer Technologies, Inc., et al.,
        
Defendants.


 



 



                    This action was tried on the facts without a jury, a jury having been waived by both parties.



 



        The Court stated its findings of facts and conclusions of law on the record after the close of the



 



        evidence, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 52(a), and invited the parties to submit



 



        briefing with respect to any other matters.  On June 8, 2010, the Court made and filed its



 



        Supplemental Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law.  Based upon its findings, judgment is



 



        entered as follows:



 



                    The Court declares that Plaintiff Motor Works, LLC a Nevada corporation is the owner of



 



        the CERMA family of trademarks, including CERMA, CERMA LUBRICATION, CERMAX,



 



        CERMA ENGINE LUBE, CERMA LUBE, CERMA ADVANCED LUBRICATION



 



        TECHNOLOGY, CERMA ORGANIC (hereinafter referred to as the CERMA family of



 



        trademarks).



 



                    Defendants Safer Technologies, Inc., Cerma Technology, Inc., George Ackerson and their



 



        respective officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys and all those persons in active concert



 



        or participation with them:










Case5:08-cv-03608-JW   Document109    Filed06/08/10   Page2 of 4



 



 



 



 



                  (1)        Are permanently enjoined and restrained from using any of the CERMA



 



                              family of trademarks or any confusingly similar trademark, trade name



 



                              component or otherwise, to market, advertise or identify Defendants products



 



                              in the United States;



 



                  (2)        Shall cease use of any and all materials developed in connection with the



 



                              advertising, promotion and marketing of Plaintiffs products including but not



 



                              limited to customer testimonials, photographs, text, test and performance data,



 



                              including but not limited to:  (a) the website cermatechnology.com, (b) any



 



                              telephone number including the pneumonic CERMA (or any variation



 



                                thereof) in the United States;



 



                    (3)        Shall cease making any representations concerning the content or quality of



 



                                the products of Plaintiff and its licensees in the United States;



 



                    (4)        Within 10 days of the date of this Judgment, shall deliver to Plaintiff or declare under



 



                                oath that they have destroyed all products, literature, advertising and other material



 



                                bearing CERMA family of trademarks or any confusingly similar trademarks the



 



                                infringing designation;



 



                    (5)        Within 10 days of the date of this Judgment, shall deliver to Plaintiff and lodge a



 



                                copy with the Court a notarized assignment to Plaintiff of:  (a) any and all state or



 



                                federal registrations or application for registration of the CERMA family of



 



                                trademarks issued to Defendants or pending from them; (b) documents necessary to



 



                                transfer ownership and control or the website cermatechnology.com and any other



 



                                websites delivered by Plaintiff or its representatives to any Defendant; (c) documents



 



                                necessary to transfer ownership and control to Plaintiffs all telephone numbers with



 



                                the pneumonic CERMA or any variation thereof held or controlled by Defendants;



 



                    (6)        Within 10 days of the date of this Judgment, shall deliver to Plaintiff at Plaintiffs



 



                                principal place of business or such other location as Plaintiff shall designate all



 



 



 



                                                                                        2










Case5:08-cv-03608-JW   Document109    Filed06/08/10   Page3 of 4



 



 



 



 



                              equipment, including but not limited to bottling machines provided by Plaintiff to



 



                              Defendants;



 



                  (7)        Within 10 days of this Judgment shall provide to Plaintiff and lodge a copy with the



 



                              Court an accounting of any and all profits of Defendants from sales of products using



 



                              the CERMA family of trademarks.



 



                  Because no relief was requested with respect to the corporate name, nothing in this Order



 



      shall be construed to require that Defendants cease doing business under the corporate name Cerma



 



      Technology, Inc.  Furthermore, nothing in this Judgment shall be construed to prevent Defendants



 



      from purchasing and selling products from BYK-Chemie GmbH or any of its distributors in the



 



        United States.



 



                    Defendants shall take nothing by way of their counterclaim.



 



                    Based on the Courts finding that the following Defendants are not liable for the actions of



 



        Defendants Safer Technologies, Inc., and Cerma Technology, Inc., judgment is entered in favor of



 



        Defendants Mary Stranahan, Nicholas Streit, and Edward Halbach against Plaintiff Motor Works,



 



        LLC.  Plaintiff shall take nothing from these named Defendants.  As between each of them and



 



        Plaintiff, each party shall bear his or her own costs, respectively.



 



                    Plaintiff has not sought attorneys fees as a sanction pursuant to the Courts March 10, 2010



 



        Order.  Otherwise, each side shall bear their own attorney fees.  Plaintiff shall recover its costs of



 



        suit.



 



                    The Clerk shall close this file.



 



 



 



        Dated:  June 8, 2010








 



 



 



 



 



 



 



 



 



 



 



                                                                                        3






JAMES WARE



Ripoffreport Report ImageUnited States District Judge










pissed off!

San Diego,
California,
United States of America
update, my input

#3Consumer Comment

Mon, January 04, 2010

An update, I wanted to let all consumers know that George Ackerson AKA George Ackerman, is the owner of the company called Cerma Technology, selling the product Cermax oil additive. Although he has taken this name from Cerma Organic International, Inc. and is selling a similar product, trying to confuse the public of the real product.
He has been involved in other issues regarding the taking of other companies products, likeness, trade names. He also owns Safer technology, Safer medical.
If you ended up here you may want to search George Ackerson to see other reports on the owner of Cerma Technology, Selling products under the name Cermax, Cerbond, Cerma, and maybe more. If you find more product names for the product listed on first report please post those names her so people know what they are buying.

In reading all the reports it looks like Cerma Organic will be getting Justice in this matter.The court where Cerma organic is suing for return of their trade name Cermax, has just denied Ackersons request for summery jugement ruling that Cerma Organic is entitled to the trade name (Cermax) court reporting this is N.California Federal court.

Good luck on your suit, and I hope to see you get justice very shortly. And exposing Cerma Technology for who they really are.


Reports & Rebuttal
Respond to this report!
Also a victim?
Repair Your Reputation!
//