pissed off!
San Diego,#2Consumer Comment
Tue, June 08, 2010
IN THE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE
DIVISION
NO. C 08-03608 JW
Motor Works, LLC
Plaintiff,
v.
This action was tried on the
facts without a jury, a jury having been waived by both parties.
The Court stated its findings of facts
and conclusions of law on the record
after the close of the
evidence, pursuant to Federal Rule of
Civil Procedure 52(a), and invited the parties to submit
briefing with respect to any other matters.
On June 8, 2010, the Court made
and filed its
Supplemental
Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law.
Based upon its findings, judgment
is
entered as follows:
The Court declares that
Plaintiff Motor Works, LLC a Nevada
corporation is the owner of
the CERMA family of trademarks, including CERMA, CERMA LUBRICATION, CERMAX,
CERMA ENGINE LUBE, CERMA LUBE, CERMA
ADVANCED LUBRICATION
TECHNOLOGY, CERMA ORGANIC (hereinafter referred to as the CERMA family of
trademarks).
Defendants Safer
Technologies, Inc., Cerma Technology, Inc., George Ackerson and
their
respective officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys and all those
persons in active concert
or participation with them:
Case5:08-cv-03608-JW Document109 Filed06/08/10 Page2 of 4
(1) Are
permanently enjoined and restrained
from using any of the CERMA
family of trademarks or any confusingly similar
trademark, trade name
component or otherwise, to market, advertise or identify Defendants
products
in
the United States;
(2) Shall cease use of any and all materials developed in connection with the
advertising,
promotion and marketing of Plaintiffs products including but not
limited to customer testimonials,
photographs, text, test and performance
data,
including
but not limited to: (a) the website cermatechnology.com, (b)
any
telephone
number including the pneumonic CERMA (or any variation
thereof) in the United States;
(3) Shall cease making any representations concerning the content or quality of
the
products of Plaintiff and its licensees in the United States;
(4) Within
10 days of the date of this Judgment,
shall deliver to Plaintiff or declare under
oath
that they have destroyed all products, literature, advertising and other material
bearing CERMA family
of trademarks or any confusingly similar trademarks the
infringing
designation;
(5) Within
10 days of the date of this Judgment,
shall deliver to Plaintiff and lodge a
copy
with the Court a notarized assignment
to Plaintiff of: (a) any and all state
or
federal
registrations or application for registration of the CERMA family of
trademarks issued to Defendants or pending from them;
(b) documents necessary to
transfer
ownership and control or the website cermatechnology.com and any other
websites
delivered by Plaintiff or its representatives to any Defendant; (c) documents
necessary
to transfer ownership and control to Plaintiffs all telephone numbers with
the
pneumonic CERMA or any variation
thereof held or controlled by Defendants;
(6) Within
10 days of the date of this Judgment,
shall deliver to Plaintiff at Plaintiffs
principal
place of business or such other location as Plaintiff shall designate all
2
Case5:08-cv-03608-JW Document109 Filed06/08/10 Page3 of 4
equipment, including but not limited to bottling machines provided by Plaintiff to
Defendants;
(7) Within
10 days of this Judgment shall
provide to Plaintiff and lodge a copy with the
Court
an accounting of any and all profits of Defendants from sales of products using
the
CERMA family of trademarks.
Because no relief was
requested with respect to the corporate name,
nothing in this Order
shall be construed to require that
Defendants cease doing business under the corporate name Cerma
Technology, Inc. Furthermore,
nothing in this Judgment shall be
construed to prevent Defendants
from purchasing
and selling products from BYK-Chemie GmbH
or any of its distributors in the
United States.
Defendants shall take
nothing by way of their counterclaim.
Based on the Courts finding
that the following Defendants are not liable for the actions of
Defendants Safer Technologies, Inc., and
Cerma Technology, Inc., judgment
is entered in favor of
Defendants Mary Stranahan, Nicholas
Streit, and Edward Halbach against Plaintiff Motor Works,
LLC.
Plaintiff shall take nothing from these
named Defendants. As between each of them and
Plaintiff, each party shall bear his or
her own costs, respectively.
Plaintiff has not sought
attorneys fees as a sanction pursuant to the Courts March 10, 2010
Order.
Otherwise, each side shall bear their own attorney fees. Plaintiff shall recover its costs of
suit.
The Clerk shall close this file.
Dated: June 8, 2010
3
JAMES WARE
United States
District Judge
Well almost 3 years later Motor Works gets our name back!
in 2008 our product Cermax was taken from us one of our vendors, Now we have a court order giving us back what has always been our's . It cost a ton of money to prove we are the legal owner of Cermatechnology.com, Cermax brand, and we are the original product makers of all cerma branded products. Now you can purchase the real original Ceramic engine treatment without having to worry if it is the real stuff as reported in the data within any website.
Cermatechnology is back where it belongs, with the real owners. Selling the real patent pending formulation of Cermax, Cerma.
Cerma Technology, Inc.
IN THE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE
DIVISION
NO. C 08-03608 JW
Motor Works, LLC
Plaintiff,
v.
This action was tried on the
facts without a jury, a jury having been waived by both parties.
The Court stated its findings of facts
and conclusions of law on the record
after the close of the
evidence, pursuant to Federal Rule of
Civil Procedure 52(a), and invited the parties to submit
briefing with respect to any other matters.
On June 8, 2010, the Court made
and filed its
Supplemental
Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law.
Based upon its findings, judgment
is
entered as follows:
The Court declares that
Plaintiff Motor Works, LLC a Nevada
corporation is the owner of
the CERMA family of trademarks, including CERMA, CERMA LUBRICATION, CERMAX,
CERMA ENGINE LUBE, CERMA LUBE, CERMA
ADVANCED LUBRICATION
TECHNOLOGY, CERMA ORGANIC (hereinafter referred to as the CERMA family of
trademarks).
Defendants Safer
Technologies, Inc., Cerma Technology, Inc., George Ackerson and
their
respective officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys and all those
persons in active concert
or participation with them:
Case5:08-cv-03608-JW Document109 Filed06/08/10 Page2 of 4
(1) Are
permanently enjoined and restrained
from using any of the CERMA
family of trademarks or any confusingly similar
trademark, trade name
component or otherwise, to market, advertise or identify Defendants
products
in
the United States;
(2) Shall cease use of any and all materials developed in connection with the
advertising,
promotion and marketing of Plaintiffs products including but not
limited to customer testimonials,
photographs, text, test and performance
data,
including
but not limited to: (a) the website cermatechnology.com, (b)
any
telephone
number including the pneumonic CERMA (or any variation
thereof) in the United States;
(3) Shall cease making any representations concerning the content or quality of
the
products of Plaintiff and its licensees in the United States;
(4) Within
10 days of the date of this Judgment,
shall deliver to Plaintiff or declare under
oath
that they have destroyed all products, literature, advertising and other material
bearing CERMA family
of trademarks or any confusingly similar trademarks the
infringing
designation;
(5) Within
10 days of the date of this Judgment,
shall deliver to Plaintiff and lodge a
copy
with the Court a notarized assignment
to Plaintiff of: (a) any and all state
or
federal
registrations or application for registration of the CERMA family of
trademarks issued to Defendants or pending from them;
(b) documents necessary to
transfer
ownership and control or the website cermatechnology.com and any other
websites
delivered by Plaintiff or its representatives to any Defendant; (c) documents
necessary
to transfer ownership and control to Plaintiffs all telephone numbers with
the
pneumonic CERMA or any variation
thereof held or controlled by Defendants;
(6) Within
10 days of the date of this Judgment,
shall deliver to Plaintiff at Plaintiffs
principal
place of business or such other location as Plaintiff shall designate all
2
Case5:08-cv-03608-JW Document109 Filed06/08/10 Page3 of 4
equipment, including but not limited to bottling machines provided by Plaintiff to
Defendants;
(7) Within
10 days of this Judgment shall
provide to Plaintiff and lodge a copy with the
Court
an accounting of any and all profits of Defendants from sales of products using
the
CERMA family of trademarks.
Because no relief was
requested with respect to the corporate name,
nothing in this Order
shall be construed to require that
Defendants cease doing business under the corporate name Cerma
Technology, Inc. Furthermore,
nothing in this Judgment shall be
construed to prevent Defendants
from purchasing
and selling products from BYK-Chemie GmbH
or any of its distributors in the
United States.
Defendants shall take
nothing by way of their counterclaim.
Based on the Courts finding
that the following Defendants are not liable for the actions of
Defendants Safer Technologies, Inc., and
Cerma Technology, Inc., judgment
is entered in favor of
Defendants Mary Stranahan, Nicholas
Streit, and Edward Halbach against Plaintiff Motor Works,
LLC.
Plaintiff shall take nothing from these
named Defendants. As between each of them and
Plaintiff, each party shall bear his or
her own costs, respectively.
Plaintiff has not sought
attorneys fees as a sanction pursuant to the Courts March 10, 2010
Order.
Otherwise, each side shall bear their own attorney fees. Plaintiff shall recover its costs of
suit.
The Clerk shall close this file.
Dated: June 8, 2010
3
JAMES WARE
United States
District Judge
pissed off!
San Diego,#3Consumer Comment
Mon, January 04, 2010
An update, I wanted to let all consumers know that George Ackerson AKA George Ackerman, is the owner of the company called Cerma Technology, selling the product Cermax oil additive. Although he has taken this name from Cerma Organic International, Inc. and is selling a similar product, trying to confuse the public of the real product.
He has been involved in other issues regarding the taking of other companies products, likeness, trade names. He also owns Safer technology, Safer medical.
If you ended up here you may want to search George Ackerson to see other reports on the owner of Cerma Technology, Selling products under the name Cermax, Cerbond, Cerma, and maybe more. If you find more product names for the product listed on first report please post those names her so people know what they are buying.
In reading all the reports it looks like Cerma Organic will be getting Justice in this matter.The court where Cerma organic is suing for return of their trade name Cermax, has just denied Ackersons request for summery jugement ruling that Cerma Organic is entitled to the trade name (Cermax) court reporting this is N.California Federal court.
Good luck on your suit, and I hope to see you get justice very shortly. And exposing Cerma Technology for who they really are.