The Holy Family
So Sorry,#2Consumer Comment
Sat, July 02, 2005
If anyone knows of a better posting spot for this let me know. Dr. Majd Chahin 1264 Ribaut Rd. Bldg. 200 Beaufort, South Carolina 29902 Dear Chahin, I would like you to explain how my step father with cancer and approximately two years to live according to you ends up dieing within 9 days after his first chemo treatment. Oh, that's right. For some reason you gave chemo-therapy to him knowing he was 76 years old with "stage four" large cell cancer of both lungs, lymph nodes and bones and was a diabetic and heart patient and had pneumonia. Then you had the nerve to go to the hospital and schedule his next chemo appointment while he laid there just hours from dieing. Surely you didn't go to that trouble to lay the ground work for your defense in case of a law suit. Furthermore, can you tell me why you waited until after you had already begun the chemo-therapy drip procedure on him to have your nurse hand him a printed copy of the side effects of chemo-therapy and never discussed the side effects of chemo-therapy with him yourself in any way prior to beginning the chemo-drip. I'm not going to beat around the bush here. I'm going to find out whether you picked financial gain over the best interest of your patient and if this sort of practice is common place within your office and your profession. You see, as my mother told you, we may not sue you. Instead, I decided to pass this story to Dateline NBC. I'm also going to get answers to other questions I have. For instance, I'm interested in knowing why it is you couldn't detect stage four cancer in one of your patients who had been going to see you every six months for cancer screenings and you had given him a clean bill of health just a few months prior to his death. Why was it he didn't learn he had cancer until it reached stage four and only after he was admitted to the hospital. Were you really doing his lab work each time he came to you for a screening or were you just billing his insurance company and taking the money? I find many factors of this situation very interesting and alarming and I promise you, we will get to the truth. I heard today you told my mom you were going to let your office staff know they need to start informing your patients of the side effects of chemo-therapy prior to scheduling the chemo appointments. I still can't believe you said that to her. Are you actually trying to pass off the blame to your staff? I hope you realize I'm talking about what you did to Gene Doyle. I say I hope because I don't know how many of your patients you may have done that to. Lastly, when my mother was at your office yesterday picking up his medical records you asked her if she had thought about seeing a psychiatrist. Considering she's not your patient, I am curious to know if you asked her because: A. You went into shock when she told you she wasn't going to sue you and experienced a Freudian slip. B. You couldn't believe she sat in your office for 45 minutes listening to you babble on while you tried to figure out who to blame for your unethical if not criminal misdeeds. C. You wanted to press a subtle threat upon her and figured she was an easy target because she is elderly and she no longer has a husband to protect her from your devious ways. D. You couldn't understand why she hasn't slapped the olive skin off your face. E. You knew word had gotten around about what you did to Gene Doyle and you wanted to take the focus off yourself. F. You knew you had also been caught instructing your office staff to lie and tell anyone who called to ask about Gene Doyle that he was just the husband of one of your patients and not your patient. Ashamed? Perhaps you thought a psychiatrist could reverse her memory for you. Yes, that was me on the phone. G. You freaked out knowing you were busted waiting until after you had already begun the chemo-therapy drip procedure on Gene to have your nurse hand him a printed copy of the side effects of chemo-therapy and never discussing the side effects of chemo-therapy with him yourself in any way prior to beginning the chemo-drip. H. You were wondering if she was recording the conversation and you couldn't think straight. I. You had previously posed the same question to her and she replied "after you". J. Your wife Jennifer is a psychiatrist and needs the money to remodel your Lady's Island house on Morgan River Dr. K. You're so ignorant you actually thought that question would insult her. L. You knew your office staff was probably listening and you thought that would help keep them from figuring out what kind of a person you are. M. You were afraid "Dateline" NBC was using hidden cameras to get to the truth. N. You don't understand the concept of what goes around comes around. I'll give you some time to think about your answers. By the way, you are going to find I am not near as easy to deal with as my mother.
Jonathan
Tyrone,#3Consumer Comment
Tue, June 28, 2005
Could you make this more confusing, talking in the first and third person interchangably, in mid sentence? Then at the end you make it sound as if you work for this company, "We at Medical Blunders hope to have Information posted on this site that helps visitors make better informed decisions in their medical treatments." No one will be able to help you unless you write more coherently.
Earl
Mesa,#4Author of original report
Tue, June 28, 2005
The Arizona Medical Board is in business to be a front to the public for the Physicians. These Medical boards hold an unreasonably higher burden of proof than the courts do. Dr Tahir's complaints at the Medical Board are buried and made unavailable to the public. No one will ever see the horror stories filed by his victims. However I have made all the Dr Lawsuits available to everyone with several highly listed web sites; one is http://www.monsterdoctor.com for the cases and criminal complaints. Then I built http://www.surgicalblunders.com to tell the whole story.
Stacey
Dallas,#5Consumer Comment
Tue, June 28, 2005
And make a complaint