Complaint Review: Illinois Circuit Courtof Cook County - Chicago Illinois

As if the OP's epic posts preceding you weren't enough, after passing your "broken scroll wheel" I couldn't stop giggling. Man, I got work to do here. I can't be giggling over this all day. You're killing me, man!

To the epical OP, this was never a civil case; it was a MENTAL case.

Patsy, I actually had the patience to read through all of this (at the peril of my brain cells) and this whole thing is going to get dismissed in summary judgment.  You cannot prosecute everyone who disagreed with you - that's not rational.  You haven't even revealed anything resembling proper evidence to present your case; just a lot of supposition and a lot of stretches in logic and rationality to make your case to the court, and then claiming these stretches in logic were illegal, citing case law that is not on point.  Your husband's trust attorney was 100% correct in his advice to your husband and persuading your husband to do something counter to his pocketbook and his wealth was not wise for you to do.  It is often much better to listen to your attorney, than not to.

In addition, no husband can be forced to divorce his wife; even if the circumstances were such that the divorce were temporary in order to adjust the terms of the trust, maybe you can explain why you aren't married now??  It's been more than a year since all of the events transpired as they have; certainly the trust has been updated by now.  I would also ask you to consider this - if your husband divorced you based on the words of his attorney, it means he chose to listen to the words of his attorney over his own wife!!  If he loved you as you suggest, surely you would be married right now.  The facts you present suggest otherwise.

I told you once already to move on because you're opening yourself up to a lawsuit.  Now I'm concerned you're going to be stuck with court costs for filing a frivilous lawsuit because the other side is going to ask for it, and depending on the judge - the judge may (or may not) grant the award of court costs from your own pocket; I've seen it happen before and it isn't pretty.  If you are stuck with court costs, bankruptcy court may be next on the calendar for you.  Please move on and best of luck to you....

Please stop With the walls of text. I broke my scroll wheel. 50k Words or less please

What a MAROON!

×

1 / 0

❮ ❯

VERIFIED  CRIMINAL  COMPLAINT

MOTION TO SET ASIDE VOID JUDGMENT, BASED ON MAJOR FRAUD UPON THE COURT, VIOLATING TITLE 18 U.S.C. 1031., INCLUDING THOSE IN THE CONTEMPT OF COURT PROCEEDINGS, Title 18 U.S.C. 1346 INTANGIBLE RIGHT OF HONEST SERVICES ., UNITED STATES V.   BOHONUS, 628 F. 2d 1167, 1171 (C.A.9 1980)., IN THE CASE MADE BY JUDGE MOIRA S. JOHNSON ON APRIL 4TH 2011.
COMES NOW the United States (Applicant)  ex relatione Patsy Lee Jablon,. Citizen of ONE OF the United States of America, Private Attorney General, Criminal Investigator and Federal Witness (hereinafter Relator)-----motioning to file a late notice of appeal to intervene pursuant to 28 U.S.C.1651 (a) -------- to provide formal notice to all interested parties, and to demand mandatory judicial notice by this honorable U.S.  Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, of this MOTION TO SET ASIDE VOID JUDGMENT, BASED ON MAJOR FRAUD UPON THE COURT, VIOLATING TITLE 18 U.S.C. 1031., INCLUDING THOSE IN THE CONTEMPT OF COURT PROCEEDINGS, Title 18 U.S.C. 1346 INTANGIBLE RIGHT OF HONEST SERVICES ., UNITED STATES V.   BOHONUS, 628 F. 2d 1167, 1171 (C.A.9 1980)., IN THE CASE MADE BY JUDGE MOIRA S. JOHNSON ON APRIL 4TH 2011., ON INFORMATION formally charging the following named individuals with the corresponding criminal violations enumerated infra.
Realtor hereby formally charges: Judge Moira Susan Johnson with;
commission of a felony by falsely assuming to be an officer of  the United States (Circuit Court Judge), acting as such under authority of the United States without the requisite credentials and without the requisite qualifications as expressly stated at  168.420 Circuit court judges; oath of office, filing.
Sec. 420.
Every person elected to the office of judge of the circuit court, before entering upon the duties of his office, shall take and subscribe to the oath as provided in section 1 of article 11 of the state constitution, and file the same with the secretary of state and a copy with each county clerk in his circuit, as lawfully amended, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 912 (one or more counts);
commission of a felony by conspiring with one or more other persons to commit offenses against the United States (Federal Government) and to defraud the United States and agencies thereof, and by doing acts specifically to effect the object of the conspiracy, in violation  of 18 U.S.C. 371( one or more counts);
commission of a misdemeanor by willfully subjecting the People of the United States of America to the deprivation of their fundamental Right to a Circuit Court Judge of the United States of America who satisfies the Qualification Claus in section 1 of article 11 of the state constitution, and file the same with the secretary of state and a copy with each county clerk in his circuit, as lawfully amended, under color of laws, statutes, ordinances, regulations or customs, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 242 (one or more counts);
commission of a felony by conspiring with one or more other persons not yet named herein, to injure, oppress, threaten or intimidate, the People of the United States of America in the free exercise and full enjoyment of their fundamental  Right to a Circuit Court Judge of the United States of America who satisfies the Qualification Claus in section 1 of article 11 of the state constitution, and file the same with the secretary of state and a copy with each county clerk in his circuit, as lawfully amended, and because  of their having so exercised and attempted so to exercise the same, in violation of  18 U.S.C. 241(one or more counts);
commission of a felony by placing in a post office, or in an authorized depository for mail, matter to be sent and delivered by the Postal Service for the purposes of executing a scheme or artifice to defraud and of obtaining Property by means of false and fraudulent pretenses, representations or promises, after having devised or intended to devise said scheme or artifice to defraud and to obtain Property by means of  false and fraudulent pretenses, representations or promises, in violations of 18 U.S.C. 1341 (one or more counts);

commission of a felony by having devised or intended to devise a scheme or artifice to defraud and to obtain money or property by means of false and fraudulent pretenses, representations or promises, by transmitting and causing to be transmitted by means of wire, radio or television communications in interstate or foreign commerce, writing, signs, signals, pictures or sound for the purpose of  executing such scheme or artifice, in violation of 18 U.S.C.1343 (one or more counts);
commission of a felony by conspiring to engage in a pattern of racketeering activity as a direct result of committing two or more of the predicate acts itemized supra and in the racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) Act, partially codified at 18 U.S.C. 1961 et seq, during the proceeding ten (10) calendar years,  in violations of 18 U.S.C. 1962 (one or more counts)
On or around February 2nd 2010, Relator retained attorney Learetta Tyson, since hiring attorney Tyson, Relator has never, never, never missed a scheduled court appearance.
On November 30th 2010, attorney Tyson has violated Title 18 U.S.C. 1343 by sending this frivolous email to Relator alleging that Relators  fee for a copy of Leonards deposition which was taking on or around June 8th 2010, would cost me $2,250.00 + 178.50 for the official shorthand reporters fee.
. See United States v. Andrade, 788 F.2d 521, 527 (8th Cir. 1986); United States v. Gordon, 780 F.2d 1165, 1171 (5th Cir. 1986); United States v. Cen-Card Agency, F. Supp. 313, 316 (D.N.J. 1989).
Attorney Tysons performance fell below an objective standard of reasonableness, she failed to investigate mitigating evidence, failure to file timely motions, failure to advocate Leonards theory of the case, failure to be competent, prompt and diligent, failed to conduct an adequate investigation.,
Representation was so inadequate and deficient that it denied six Amendment right, she violated Title 18 U.S.C. 1512 (b)(1), that she rendered ineffective assistance of counsel. See  Strickland v. Wahington, 466 U.S. 668, 80 L.Ed.2d 674, 104 .Ct. 2052 (1984) United States v. Briscoe, 65 F.3d 576, 583 (7th Cir. 1995) (citing United States v. Ames Sintering Co., 927 F.2d 232, 234 (6th Cir. 1990) (per curiam)); United States v. Frey, 42 F.3d 795, 797 (3d Cir. 1994) ( see exhibit B)  
On February 8th 2011, in open court opposing counsel ( Jessica Oefelein)  falsely and fraudulently stated in her closing argument that Relator, while residing with husband, Relator took $10,000.00 out of  the home, about five (5) minutes later she falsely and fraudulently stated that Relator took $16,000.00 from the home, attorney Tyson didnt object, therefore immediately after opposing counsel made her false and frivolous statement, Judge Johnson, without a trial and without further testimony,  violated Relators due process rights  under  18 U.S.C. 196, 1951(b)(2) ordering Relator to pay 10% of 16,000.00 by March 22nd 2011, or  Relator would be in Contempt of Court, causing Relator severe emotional distress, in fear of  incarceration, violating Relators LIBERTY, when in fact Judge Johnson, attorney Oefelein and attorney Tyson  with Leonard Jablon, aiding and abetting them, had conspired against Relator to violate her civil right based on a conspiracy to fix the case, a violation of Title U.S.C. 1961, 1962, 1963, 1964 by doing so, they committed fraud  upon the court.  (see The People of the State of Illinois v. Fred E. Sterling, 357 Ill. 354; 192 N.E. 229 (1934)  See  Hamel, 668 N.E. 2d 390 (New York 1996) ., a judge is not a court.
People v. zajic, 88 Ill.App.3d 477, 410 N.E. 2d 626 (1980).
On February 8th 2011, opposing counsel (Oefelein) filed a frivolous motion for contempt of court and bond was set , Judge Johnson allowed this frivolous and fraudulent motion to be filed, she then violated Title 18 U.S.C. 1001, by allowing PARTY TO PURGE . See United States v. Rodgers, 466 U.S. 45, 479,104 S. Ct. 1942, 1946, 80 L. Ed 49291984).                 (see exhibit DD and  exhibit U)
an equally expressive definition was given by Lord Dyer, as cited in Stowell vs. Zouch, Plowden 359; and it is equally applicable to the present case; that 'a claim is a challenge by a man of the propriety or ownership of a thing which he has not in his possession, but which is wrongfully detained from him.' The slave is to be delivered up on the claim." -- 16 Peters 614-15
On February 8th 2011, Judge Johnson, violated Title 18 1962(d) , 1346, in open court, ordered that Relator or attorney Tyson  can not assert any arguments toward Relators Florida property at any time in the future., relating to Relators gift home, located at 5242 Fleming St. Port Charlotte Fl.
See, e.g., United States v. Rogers, 788 F.2d 1472, 1476 (11th Cir. 1986); United States v. Jenkins, 943 F.2d 167 (2d Cir. 1991). U.S.C. 1962(d) ; Bulloch v. United States, 763 F. 2d 1115, 1121(10th Cir. 1985); Kenner v. C.I.R.. 387 F. 3d 689 (1968).
FACTS:

On or around December 26th 2007, Leonard and Relator were dating for several months, Leonard  promised to buy/build Relator her  very own dream/vacation home, in whatever state or country she wanted., Relator  first choice was Canada, then Costa Rica, which ever came first, Relator located an absolute auction on the website (E bay.)
On or around January 12th 2008, Relator telephoned a Canadian real estate agent, informed him that I, (Relator) want to purchase property there in Canada., agent said, in order to purchase property here in Canada, you must first have an account with a Bank here.
On or around January 17th 2008, Leonard and (Relator) flew to Canada to open an account for (Relator) ,
Relator opened two (2) accounts, a Canadian savings account and a Canadian checking account both in the
name of Patsy Hausley, Leonard wrote a $600.00 check from his checking account to place in  Relators new savings account, Relator placed around $300.00 cash that Leonard  had give her into the new checkings account.
On or around September 4th 2008, Relator purchased 1.75 acres of land from an absolute auction site via the internet on a website called eBay, I plaintiff was the highest bidder, total purchase price was around $1,500.00
On or around September 10th, 2008 O Sr., stated to Relator that I, (Relator) should find another location for my dream/vacation home, some place where we could fly one of Leonards helicopter to, I (Relator) then chose the State of Florida, upon searching for a home or land without any success, I Relator decided to contact some real estate agents in the State of Florida.
(1) Real estate agent, Nick Lendenburg, Cypress Realty Inc.
7270-4 College Parkway, Fort Myers, FL 33907 (239) 878-9509
(2) Real estate agent, Dodd Skipper, Locatehomes.com 1625 S.E. 47th Terrace
Cape Coral, FL 33904       888-352-4687
Leonard and Relator signed numerous contracts with the real estate agents in question.
(See exhibits 54,55,77)
On or around December21st 2008, Leonard suggest that I (RELATOR) talk to Nick Lindenburg about a land Trust to put my property in when I locate one.
Nick Lendenburg  quoted me a price of around $750.00., I, (Relator) asked Leonard if  I could ask my good friend to purchase the Land trust for me as a Christmas gift, Leonard said yes, and I asked friend and he purchased it.
On March 16th 2009, Leonard spoke with attorney Sadowski via the telephone with telephone speaker on, Leonard informed Sadowski that he was purchasing Relator her very own dream home, and that Relator chose to look for property in the State of Florida, Sadowski congratulated him. ( see exhibit 62).
On or around April 2nd 2009, while surfing the internet, Relator came across a real foreclosure site Called the Charlotte County real foreclosure absolute auction site.
All properties are sold AS IS, You must register on the web site and you are required to place a deposit equal to 5% of your estimated successful final bid.
Either on the Charlotte.realforeclosed.com website via electronic check (ACH) or in person with cash or cashiers check or money order payable to: CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT.
On or around April 2nd  2009, Leonard gave the Clerk of the Circuit Court a 10,000.00 deposit. via electronic check (ACH). For Relators dream home. (see exhibit 41, 42 ).
The name on the Title was (The Mahoghanys Crystal Trust) with Leonard Jablon as Trustee.
( see exhibit 81).
The successful bidder MUST pay the balance of the final bid PLUS the registry of the court service charge no later than 11:00AM EM  (THE NEXT BUSINESS DAY).
On 05/11/2009,  Relator was the successful highest bidder for the Florida bank foreclosed home In the amount of  $186,100. The certificate of Title was in the name of Relators Trust (see exhibit 79 and 88).
On 05/11/2009, Leonard and Relator hurried to his banks and withdrew the checks from Leonards personal / business accounts,  he also withdrew  a $25,000.00  cash advance from one of his credit cards and rushed to the FedEx center to overnight the money to the Charlotte County Courthouse (see exhibits 87,  43,  43-A ).
On May. 11, 2009 Leonard,  asked his accountant, Mr. Roger Rowe, to sell three small stocks from the Judith Jablon Trust. ( see exhibits 90,  90-A,  90-B).

On 05/12/2009 the home located at :  5242 Fleming St. Port Charlotte Florida was Relators official dream/vacation home, According to the Charlotte County clerk of the courts (see exhibit 88).
On May 13th 2009, Leonard,  received the money from the stocks and deposit the money into his
  personal/ business  accounts to REIMBURSE HIMSELF for the purchase of my Florida dream home.
   (see exhibits 89, 89A, 89B)
On 05/19/2009, Leonard Relator and Relators mother flew (airplane) to Port Charlotte Florida for seven days to see and work on cleaning up Relators new Florida property, and we purchased items for my property, all of which was paid for with Leonards  corporate credit card.
On or around May 26th  2009 , Leonard, with telephone speaker on, telephoned his estate attorney Donald Sadowski, and asked him to do a background check for liens and encumbrances on Relators  new Florida dream/vacation home.
At first attorney Sadowski congratulated us, then Leonard emailed attorney Sadowski pictures of my new Florida Dream/vacation home.
Attorney Sadowski was amazed that Relator was able to locate a 1,992 square ft. waterfront property at an amazingly low cost of only $186,100.00, which was originally purchased for $ 555,000.00 by the previous owner. ( see exhibits II,  II-1,  II-2).
Sadowski went on to say to Leonard that this is both of your second marriages, why dont you ask Relator to take her home out of her name and out of her Trust name, and put the home in your deceased wife Trust ( The Judith Jablon Trust) to ensure you both stay married until death and when you (Leonard) dies then Relator can get her home back.
Leonard said no I (Leonard) purchased the home for Relator, its in her name and in the name of her Trust and shes to keep the home in her Trust.
I, (Relator) agreed with Sadowski to put the home in the Judith Jablon Trust, because this marriage with Leonard and Relator was for life,  (so Relator believed) but  Relator would first like to get a second opinion on the Judith Jablon Trust.
Sadowski yelled no second opinions, Relator then ask Sadowski if he would create a joint Trust for Leonard and I, (Relator) then I (Relator) would put the home in a new joint Trust, again Sadowski yelled no and strongly suggested to Leonard not to let Relator gat a second opinion on the Trusts.
I (Relator) got suspicious and asked Leonard if I (Relator) could get a second opinion on both the Judith Jablon Trust and the Leonard Trust, Leonard said yes, Leonard said that both the Judith and the Leonard Jablon Trust are the same,  simple land trusts, the only difference is that the Judith Trust has more stuff in it,   according to Sadowski, just in case I (Leonard ) died flying one of the helicopters, or in case I (Leonard) get sued.
while on the telephone with Sadowski, Leonard took the two Trusts from his file and started to make me copies.
Attorney Sadowski, violated Title 18 U.S.C 1951(a)  by suggested to Leonard over the telephone with the speaker on, that Leonard must bring Relator to his office to sign a pre-nuptial and a post-nuptial and he (Sadowski) will backdate the pre-nuptial,  Relator immediately so no, Relator refused to be a party to illegally backdating Legal Documents, Sadowski got furious then he gave Relator an ultimatum and a threat Either you ( Relator) come to my office and sign the documents or Leonard must divorce you, I will transfer all of Leonards property into the Judith Trust, re-set his port folio, then Leonard can re-marry you, (Relator) if he wants., again Relator refused, Sadowski then strongly stated that he is going to come at Relator  at all cost, he later successfully caused the breakdown of  Leonard and Relators  marriage, by doing so Sadowski violated Title 18 U.S.C. 844 (e).
(e) Whoever, through the use of the mail, telephone, telegraph, or other instrument of interstate or foreign commerce, or in or affecting interstate or foreign commerce, willfully makes any threat, or maliciously conveys false information knowing the same to be false, concerning an attempt or alleged attempt being made, or to be made, to kill, injure, or intimidate any individual or unlawfully to damage or destroy any building, vehicle, or other real or personal property by means of fire or an explosive shall be imprisoned for not more than 10 years or fined under this title, or both.
Sadowski then told Leonard to come to his office, and bring Relators signed land Trust with him, Leonard went to his office with Relators  signed land Trust.
When Leonard came home from Sadowskis office, he said that Sadowski shredded Relators  signed Trust.
Attorney Sadowski, then tried to persuade Leonard to secretly file for a divorce, Leonard refused.
On or around May 27th  2009,  I, Relator telephoned Sadowski,  with the telephone speaker on, and asked him why did he shred  my Trust,  that he had no right to dispose of anything of Relators, he alleged that it was not a legal and proper trust and it was not worth the paper it was written on.  
On June 4th 2009, with Leonard having the telephone speaker on, Sadowski then gave Leonard two choices
Choice 1, allow me(Sadowski)  to assist you (Leonard) in divorcing Patsy and get the Florida home out from her name and out of her Trust name outs, re-set  your port folio to benefit you and only you, then later re-marry Patsy.
Choice 2, be honest with the Florida Courts and allow Patsy to keep her Florida gift home and end up in prison for the rest of your natural life.
On or around June 4th 2009, Sadowski,  telephoned Leonard, with Leonard having his telephone speaker on, Sadowski induced Leonard into filing for a Divorce, his reason was because Relator is not complying with me (Sadowski) and we, Sadowski and Leonard can go to Federal Prison because I (Sadowski) have already misused the Judith Jablon Trust with your (Leonard) consent,  by setting up the Judith Jablon Trust as though the Florida Property was purchased with the money from the Judith Trust and if the Security and Exchange Commission finds out what ( WE ) did, then you (Leonard) and I (Sadowski) will go to Federal Prison for the rest of our lives and that he ( Sadowski)  just telephoned the head clerk, who oversees the Florida, bank foreclosed auction site, and made this frivolous accusation, something to the effect of I am attorney Donald Sadowski from Chicago, Ill. Im the estate attorney for Leonard  and Judith Jablon, Patsy Hausley, (Relator) is Leonards Caretaker, when Leonard turned his back, Patsy Hausley ( Relator) stolen money from Leonard Jablon, then secretly purchased a Florida home off your website, therefore Im calling to take her name off the Title and out of her Trust.
Leonard responded and asked Sadowski if he would just make a new joint Trust that will benefit both Patsy and I (Leonard) and then we will put the Florida home in the new trust, Sadowski said to Leonard quote dont forget that what we are doing is illegal and if Patsy finds out about this then we will be in very grave trouble if she reports us, Sadowski heard me (Patsy) whispering in the background begging Leonard not
to get involved in Sadowskis fraudulent scheme, Sadowski asked if he was on a conference call, Leonard said yes, I (Patsy) yelled.. You will be reported, Sadowski was terribly upset by the tone of his voice, he strongly ordered Leonard to come back to his office.
See (Buckaloo v. Johnson (1975) 14 Cal.3d 815, 827.)
Whoever knowingly executes, or attempts to execute, a scheme or artifice
(1)   to defraud any person in connection with any commodity for future delivery, or any option on a commodity for future delivery, or any security of an issuer with a class of securities registered under section 12 of the securities exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.781) or that is required to file reports under section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15U.S.C. 780 (d)); or
(2)  To obtain, by means of false and fraudulent pretenses, representations, or promises, any money or property in connection with the purchase or sale of any commodity for future delivery, or any option on a commodity for future delivery, or any security of an issuer with a class of securities registered under section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.  781) or that is required to file reports under section 15 (d)  of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 780 (d));
Shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned not more than 25 years, or both.
I (Relator) immediately called the Florida Clerk, who oversees the auction, she angrily stated to Relator that I (Relator) was in big trouble, and multiple Fraud charges will be brought against me for defrauding the Florida courts, and I (Relator) will be in prison for many, many, many, many, many, many, many years.
I (Relator) nervously  explained to her that the accusations attorney Sadowski made was frivolous and hes the one whos trying to defrauded the Florida Courts, not Relator, She then transferred me to Chief Deputy Jim Masch, I explained to him that I am Leonards wife and not his Caretaker, that my husband purchased this Florida property for me as a gift, I explained that I overheard the Intentional Scheme and Plot against me and the Florida Court orchestrated by attorney Sadowski via the telephone conversation between Sadowki and Leonard and attorney Sadowski is trying to defraud the Florida Courts, not I.
On or around June 4th 2009, Chief Deputy  Masch ask for proof that I (Relator) am Leonards wife, I immediately faxed him a copy of my identification card, a copy of my credit cards baring the names of both Hausley and Jablon,  my marriage license, copies of several different property contracts that Leonard signed as trustee to the Mahoghanys Crystal Trust, a copy of the Judith Jablon three sold stocks, a copy of my Land Trust ( see exhibits  35, 35A,  54,  55,  67, 73,  75,  77,  90,  90-A,  90-B..
On June 8th 2009,Chief Deputy Masch emailed Relator back, stating that Relator Florida gift home will say in the name of her Trust. (see exhibit 80 ).
On or around June 8TH 2009, Sadowski, stated to Leonard, with Leonard having the telephone speaker on that a Florida Judge said that the Courts will send some kind of form to Relator  to fill out, Relator have thirty days to fill it out then return it back to the Florida Courts, Sadowski urged Leonard to kick Relator out of the Northbrook residence so they can intercept the mail., by doing so they violated Title 345 U.S.C. 567, 567      See Tinder v. United States. 345 U.S. 565 (1953).
On June 8th 2009, Leonard suggest that Relator use my credit card and retain a divorce attorney to protect herself, because I (Leonard) cant beat Sadowski in his corruption therefore I (Leonard) must join him. Tanner v. United States, 483 U.S. 107, 128 (1987); see Dennis v. United States, 384 U.S. 855 (1966).
5A.  Quoting Illinois Statutes - 740 ILCS 5/0.01 et seq - alienation of affection reads as follows:
Sec. 0.01. Short title. This Act may be cited as the Alienation of Affections Act. Sec. 1. It is hereby declared, as a matter of legislative determination, that the remedy heretofore provided by law for the enforcement of the action for alienation of affections has been subjected to grave abuses and has been used as an instrument for blackmail by unscrupulous persons for their unjust enrichment, due to the indefiniteness of the damages recoverable in such actions and the consequent fear of persons threatened with such actions that exorbitant damages might be assessed against them. It is also hereby declared that the award of monetary damages in such actions is ineffective as a recompense for genuine mental or emotional distress. Accordingly, it is hereby declared as the public policy of the state that the best interests of the people of the state will be served by limiting the damages recoverable in such actions and by leaving any punishment of wrongdoers guilty of alienation of affections to proceedings under the criminal laws of the state, rather than to the imposition of punitive, exemplary, vindictive, or aggravated damages in actions for alienation of affections. Consequently, in the public interest, the necessity for the enactment of this chapter is hereby declared as a matter of legislative determination.
On or around June 15th 2009, attorney Sadowski, recruited in his scheme to engage in a pattern of racketeering, to commit major fraud upon the court was Mckinley, Ittersagen, Gunderson, Berntsson, Waksler & Wideikis, LLP. Attorneys at Law.,  association-in-fact enterprise. another frivolous statement was made to the Judge, now fraudulently alleging that Leonard made a mistake and placed the Florida home in the Mahoghanys Crystal Trust, a non-existing Trust, a violation of  Title 18 U.S.C. 1621, 1001, 1002, 1341. See, e.g., U.S. v. Jones, Information 6, No. S6-05-CR-1067 (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 5, 2007).     Schmuck v. United States, 489 U.S. 705, 721 n. 10 (1989)  (see exhibit O)( exhibit 82).
On or around June 15th 2009, Sadowski and Leonard, engaged in a pattern of racketeering, conspired to devise a scheme to defraud the Florida court, which violated Title 18 U.S.C. 371, 1962(d),  2113(a), 1001, 1002, 371,1348, 1341, 1343, 1346, 1951, 1951(b)(2), 2314, civil fraud 25.1.6.3  by successfully stealing Relators Florida Home, by doing so, he used the interstate transportation to steal  my property Title, by extortion, fraud, to intentionally deprive me of my  property and or honest services via mail fraud,  wire fraud communication,  fraud upon the court, obstruction of justice, and by fraudulently alleging that an undivided 54.72% interest goes to the Leonard J. Jablon Trust, fraudulently alleging that  an undivided 45.28% goes into the Judith M. Jablon Trust, then threaten to illegally cause Relator to go to prison, making Relator afraid to expose his fraudulently schemes, in fear of  him causing the break down Relators marriage, and in fear of Relators husband abandoning her, illegally stealing Relators Florida home, which he (Sadowski) successfully succeeded., United States v. Lemire, 720 F.2d 1327, 1334-35 n. 6 (D.C. Cir. 1983) See United States v. Middlemiss, 217 F.3d 112, 118 (2d Cir. 2000)See also United States v. Zemek, 634 F.2d 1159, 1174(9th Cir. 1980).
On or around June 16th 2009 Relator, located an attorney to get a second opinion on the two Trusts (Leonard and Judith Jablon Trust) by the name of Larry Mraz located at:  111 E. Irving park Rd.  Roselle IL., I (Relator) scheduled  an appointment, Relaotr met with attorney the same day of June 16th 2009, I then explained my situation regarding attorney Sadowski and his ultimatum and threat, I (Relator) asked attorney Larry Mraz would he create me (Relator) and Leonard a trust like the Judith and  Leonard Jablon Trust.

Attorney Larry Mraz explained to me ( Relator) that the two Trusts were not the same, one is a simple land trust, the other is a marital and residuary trust, he went on to say that,  you would have to pay a million dollars plus to create this particular trust, (the marital and residuary trust)
Attorney Larry Mraz also explain that if I put my Florida home into the Judith Jablon Trust, then the house would never be mines, because the Judith Jablon Trust was a family trust and any property in that trust could not be depleted.
Attorney Larry Mraz also stated that he did not want to create my new trust because he did not  want any part of an attorney who would back date a prenuptial, so he referred me to attorney Heidelberger.
I explained this to my husband, my husband called attorney Sadowski,  attorney Sadowski said that the Judith Jablon Trust can AND will be depleted,  but slowly.
On or around June 16th 29, Relator, telephoned attorney Heidelberger, I (Relator) met with attorney Heidelberger that same day, I explained the situation with Sadowski,  involving secretly divorcing me and trying to take possession of my Florida gift home., attorney Heidelberger said that if I (Relator) dont sign any papers, then they cant take possession of your Florida gift home., he said that if I (Relator) retained him then he will not allow Sadowski to take possession of my Florida home, which is a gift to you (Relator) in Trust and that you (Relator) will need an attorney who specializes in that field, and I (Heidelberger) specializes in Wills and Trusts as well, and I (Heidelberger) can draw-up papers to protect your Florida home any kind of property theft., Heidelderger went on to say,  just retain me and I will not file papers, I (Heidelberger will not do anything until the opposing counsel does., Heidelberger, went on to say that if I (Relator) dont retain him now, then it might be too late to retain any attorney, because Sadowski WILL  convince Leonard to cut off my credit card, so I (Relator) retained him for $5, 000.00 using the credit card Leonard gave me, as co-owner.
On or around June 16th 2009, Leonard drove to the Schaumburg apartment to pick Relator up and take her back to his Northbrook residence.
On June 19th 2009, dissolution of marriage was secretly filed by attorney Sadowskis partners. Lagattuta, degrzia & Oefelein, who has the same business mailing address and the same suite., Possible misconduct (see exhibit D).
On June 19th 2009, attorney Heidelberger telephoned me (Relator) and stated that Joel Degrazia, filed the marriage papers.
On June 22nd 2009, Leonard and I (Relator) went to the Skokie Court house, Leonard stopped the procedure.
On or around June 22nd 2009, Sadowski telephoned Leonard and strongly suggested that Leonard come to his office.
Leonard came home with a paper for me (Relator) to sign, releasing my attorney and fax it back to Sadowski, again I refused to sign the document but I faxed the unsigned document to attorney Heidelberger for review.
On or around July 7th 2009, Leonard came home from another day at attorney Sadowskis office and presented Relator with his new Living Will that Sadowski had created, then altered,, knowing that Leonards first wife was deceased in 2009 when he (Sadowski) created and altered this Living Will in July 2009, then backdated to 2000, a violation of Title 18 chapter 73( see exhibit 2).
"Whoever knowingly alters, destroys, mutilates, conceals, covers up, falsifies, or makes a false entry in any record, document, or tangible object with the intent to impede, obstruct, or influence the investigation or proper administration of any matter within the jurisdiction of any department or agency of the United States or any case filed under title 11, or in relation to or contemplation of any such matter or case, shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both.
On or around October, 21st 2009, Court was in session, attorney Heidelberger suggested that I, (Relator) stay in the hall while he go into the court room for a few minute review, he stated that nothing is going to happen today, but he came out of the court room and said that Leonard was ordered by Judge Bellows to give me (Relator) two months of temporary maintenance for $ 1,00.00 each month, and Leonard is ordered to pay my (Relator) attorney fees., he then stated Oh by the way, they got your Florida gift home.
I, (Relator) was shocked, because I believed in attorney Heidelberger as an attorney, he convinced me that my Florida gift home will be protected from attorney Sadowskis scheme.
Attorney Heidelberger, said not to worry because hes going to put Sadowski on the witness stand, with your (Relator) evidence, and he (Sadowski) will be in big trouble.

Attorney Heidelberger, some reason,  changed his mind about going after Sadowski, or trying to get
Relators Florida gift home back., Heidelberger stopped talking to me, I would have to talk to his paralegals.
On or around November 30th 2009,  I (Relator) telephoned attorney Tyson, scheduled a consultation, on that very day, Relator explained to her about how Sadowski illegally defrauded the Florida Courts and stolen my property, which was a gift in trust, I (Relator) explained to her, how attorney Heidelberger, lied to me during our initial consultation, took my retainer, then conspired against me and start working with the other side.
Attorney Sadowski violated Title 18 U.S.C. 1002 - SECTION 1002.
Whoever, knowingly and with intent to defraud the United States or any agency thereof, possesses any false, altered, forged, or counterfeited writing or document for the purpose of enabling another to obtain from the United States, or from any agency, officer or agent thereof, any sum of money, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.
Carpenter, 484 U.S. at 27 (quoting McNally v. United States, 483 U.S. 350, 358 (1987) (quoting Hammerschmidt v. United States, 265 U.S. 182, 188 (1924))). "The concept of 'fraud' includes the act of embezzlement, which is '"the fraudulent appropriation to one's own use of the money or goods entrusted to one's own care by another."'" Id. (quoting Grin v. Shine, 187 U.S. 181, 189 (1902).
Whoever, having devised or intending to devise any scheme or artifice to defraud, or for obtaining money or property by means of false or fraudulent pretenses, representations, or promises, transmits or causes to be transmitted by means of wire, radio, or television communication in interstate or foreign commerce, any writings, signs, signals, pictures, or sounds for the purpose of executing such scheme or artifice, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both. If the violation affects a financial institution, such person shall be fined not more than $1,000,000 or imprisoned not more than 30 years, or both.         (see exhibits  1, 3, 82, 83, 83-A).
On or around November 2009, Leonard informed me that attorney Heidelberger had indeed sold me out for the other side, he stated that any attorney that I (Relator) get will sell me out, because when a person accuse an attorney of wrong doing, they (attorneys) all sticks together.                          
On December 1st 2009, I ( Relator) emailed attorney Heidelberger, and fired him.
On September 1st 2010, (attorney Tyson) never prepared me for the pre-trial hearing,  attorney Tyson never discussed questions that would be asked during the pre-trial hearing, there was never a trial.
On September 1st 2010 attorney Tyson, Judge Johnson, attorney Oefelein, engaged in a pattern of racketeering, by doing so, violated Title 18, 241, 242 , 1724 Protection of Government Processes- Omnibus Claus-- 18 U.S.C. 1503 by depriving me of my right to allow my witnesses ( Crystal Hale) ( Mahoghany Washington) to testify on my behalf. (see exhibit 0002).
Endeavoring to influence a witness not to testify or to make himself/herself unavailable to testify. United States v. Washington Water Power Co., 793 F.2d 1079 (9th Cir. 1986); United States v. Arnold, 773 F.2d 823 (7th Cir. 1985); United States v. Harrelson, 754 F.2d 1153 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 908 and 1034 (1985); United States v. Partin, 552 F.2d 621 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 903 (1977).
Endeavoring to influence, through a third party, a judge. United States v. Glickman, 604 F.2d 625 (9th Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1080 (1980); United States v. Fasolino, 586 F.2d 939 (2d Cir. 1978) (per curiam),
On or around September 2nd 2010, in open court, opposing counsel induced fraud upon the courts, subornation of perjury by submitting this fraudulent and illegal document, INVESTMENT ACCOUNTS and SECURITIE:
(see exhibit 001).
On September 1st 2010, attorney Tyson, fraudulently alleged in her billing statement that was emailed to me, that there was a pre-trial conference; entered into settlement negotiations - parties did not settle hearing scheduled for September 8th 2011.
On September 1st 2010, I (Patsy) did not attend a pre-trial conference, alleged by (attorney Tyson), I was unaware of a pre-trial conference, there was never any negotiations.
On September 8th 2010, I (Patsy)  did not attend a pre-trial conference, alleged by (attorney Tyson), there was never a pre-trial conference, there was never any negotiations.

On or around September 8th 2010 while I (Relator) when being questioned under oath, attorney Tyson deliberately asked the type of questions that allowed attorney Oefelein , to object and Judge Johnson, to sustain, so my testimony would not be recorded.
On or around September 13th  2010, months after I retained her, attorney Tyson written a bogus fee petition for Leonard to pay attorney fees.
On or around September 13th 2010, Judge Johnson denied attorney Tysons fee petition, Judge Johnson said to re-write the fee petition.
On February 8th 2011, judge Johnson, barred Relator from asserting any arguments  for the return of my Florida home, located at: 5242 Fleming St, Port Charlotte Fl. 33981, which was a gift in Trust, without giving a hearing in a State Court proceeding,  violates Title 18, 1963 (b) (1, 2) which is a erroneous deprivation of property without due process.  
On February 8th 2011, months later, attorney Tyson, re-wrote her fee petition after conspiring with opposing counsel ( Jessica Oefelein) and Judge Johnson to bring fraud upon the Courts, and filing frivolous and fraudulent documents, then Purging the documents. (fee petition for respondent to pay denied)  see Bullock v. United states, 763 F.2d 1115, 1121 (10th Cir. 1985).
On February 9th 2011,  Court not in Session,  but opposing counsel filed a frivolous order of default for failure to appear.
Attorney Oefelein,  stated in this frivolous and fraudulent Judgment for dissolution of marriage that I (Relator) was personally served on February 9th 2011. ( see exhibit 46, page 1).
On February 9th 2011, after many, many, many  verbal withdrawals from attorney Tyson, attorney Tyson emailed me (Relator), withdrawing herself as my attorney, as of February 9th 2011,  at 11: 13 AM, but she frivolous alleged in her billing statement to me, that I (Relator) discharged her.
(see exhibits  F) ( exhibit 61) and (exhibit 101).
On February 10th 2011,  I ( Relator) was convinced that attorney Tyson was co-counsel for the opposing counsel (attorney Oefelein), I ( Relator) emailed her and fired her, only after she had already withdrew via email from my case the day before. (see exhibit 61).
On March 10th 2011, attorney Tyson, on the record withdrew from Relators case without a legal cause,  she has violated Rule 8. 3 and Rule 8. 4, Reporting Professional Misconduct.
Attorney Tyson the opposing counsel  ( attorney Oefelein) and Judge Johnson, engaged in a pattern of racketeering, in doing so,  violated Titles 18 U.S.C. 1962 (d) Conspiracy Act,  Title 18 U.S.C. 1964, 1346.  The elements of a "scheme to defraud" are "(I) the existence of a scheme to defraud, (ii) the requisite scienter (or fraudulent intent) on the part of the defendant, and (iii) the materiality of the misrepresentations" United States v. Autuori, 212 F.3d 105, 115 (2d Cir. 2000) (internal citations omitted).  Title 18 U.S.C. 1341 Frauds and swindles, Title 18 U.S.C. 1343 Fraud by wire, Title 18 U.S.C. 1512 ( d)( 1)  Tampering with a witness, Obstructing Justice, Retaliating against a victim, violated Title 18 U.S.C. 1621  and Title 28 U.S.C. 1728 Fraud.
a) A lawyer who knows that another lawyer has committed a violation of the Rules of Professional Conduct that raises a substantial question as to that lawyer's honesty, trustworthiness or fitness as a lawyer in other respects, shall inform the appropriate professional authority.
(b) A lawyer who knows that a judge has committed a violation of applicable rules of judicial conduct that raises a substantial question as to the judge's fitness for office shall inform the appropriate authority.
It is professional misconduct for a lawyer to:
(a) violate or attempt to violate the Rules of Professional Conduct, knowingly assist or induce another to do so, or do so through the acts of another;
(b) commit a criminal act that reflects adversely on the lawyer's honesty, trustworthiness or fitness as a lawyer in other respects;
(c) engage in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation;
(d) engage in conduct that is prejudicial to the administration of justice;
(e) state or imply an ability to influence improperly a government agency or official or to achieve results by means that violate the Rules of Professional Conduct or other law; or
(f) knowingly assist a judge or judicial officer in conduct that is a violation of applicable rules of judicial conduct or other law.

On March 2010, through March 2011, attorney Tyson failed to exercise a reasonable degree of care or skill in representing her me, client
When one party is NOT doing their job, upholding their oath, not zealously representing your client - the system doesn't work. Defendants are wrongfully convicted, cases are wrongly decided. In extreme cases, we no longer have justice - we have INjustice.
On or around March 10th 2011, I ( Relator) telephoned attorney Tyson to retrieve my files/documents for my new attorney,  attorney Tyson asked me to have my new attorney  call her.
On March 10th 2011, my family hired an attorney by the name of Michael Moore, who was present on the next court date which was March 22nd 2011.
On March 22nd 2011, my new attorney Michael Moore, appeared before the court, to file his appearance and to address the fraudulent and illegal  contempt of Court, and default  charges that was illegally placed on Relator,  Judge Johnson gave attorney Michael Moore TWENTY-ONE DAYS TO FILE  his written appearance.
March 22nd 2011, opposing counsel,  Jessica Oefelein, documented another fraudulent default order against Relator, (fraudulently) alleging  that I (Relator) failed to file an appearance and answer for March 22nd 2011.
On April 4th  2011, opposing counsel Oefelein, and  Judge Johnson,  engaged in a pattern of racketeering, then violated 18 U.S.C. 371, 1346, 1348, Rule 60 (b) (4), 12.1.6.3.,  directed a conspiracy and scheme, used the U.S. Postal Service, in which they fraudulently filed and caused to file  fraudulent and illegal documents ( Judgment for dissolution of marriage) through the Cook County Court that I (Relator) was in default,  and that I  was personally served an order of default papers on February 9th 2011
 (see exhibit 46).,  in exhibit 46, its alleged that Lagattuta, Degrazia & Oefelein, P.C..  is Leonards attorneys, its alleged that I (Relator) was personally serves on February 9th 2011, that I (Relator)  had engaged in acts of extreme and repeated mental cruelty against Leonard, without any provocation by Leonard, that I (Relator) failed to file an appearance and answer, THE COURT entered a default order against me on March 22nd 2011, Leonard Jablon, SR. shall retain his sole and separate NON-MARITAL property, his beneficial interest in the real property commonly known as 5242 Fleming Street, Port Charlotte, Florida 33981 and the contents therein.
Said property is a trust asset of the Judith Jablon Trust  ( 97%) and Leonard Jablon SR. is currently the Trustee of said Trust and the Leonard Jablon Trust (3%) and Leonard Jablon, SR. is currently the Trustee of said Trust.
Attorney Donald Sadowski, and his Florida co-conspirators,  association-in-fact enterprise                       Mckinley, Ittersagen, Gunderson, Berntsson, Waksler & Wideikis, LLP. Attorneys at Law, committed major fraud upon the Florida court, by engaging in a pattern of racketeering by fraudulently alleging that an undivided 54.72% of interest belongs in the Leonard Jablon Trust and an undivided  45. 28%  interest belongs in the Judith Jablon Trust, his (Sadowski) Illinois co-conspirator committed fraud upon the Illinois court, by fraudulently alleging that an undivided 97% of interest belongs to the Leonard Jablon Trust and an undivided 3% of interest belongs in the Judith Jablon Trust.
On April 4th 2011,  by attorney Oefelein, own admission, on page 2 of said hearing,  she and Judge Johnson, violated Title 18 U.S.C. 1621, 1001, 1513, 1341intentionally and fraudulently devised a scheme to committed  fraud upon the Court, by  the court by alleging to the court that she (attorney Oefelein ) as a courtesy, sent a copy and notice of todays hearing and the order of default that was entered on March 22nd 2011to  Mrs. Jablon., ( Relator) a  violation of Model Rule 4. 2,  ( see exhibit JJ).
Judge Johnson, engaged in a pattern of racketeering by allowing the fraudulent default/ proof of notice documents to be entered, when she known or should have known that on March 22nd 2011, she (Judge Johnson) gave Relators new attorney, Michael Moore twenty-one days to file his written appearance, therefore she ( Judge Johnson) engaged in a scheme to prevent me (Relator) from hiring new counsel. (see exhibit JJ )( party to purge, Allowed) .
See Carpenter, 484 U.S. at 27 (quoting McNally v. United States, 483 U.S. 350, 358 (1987) (quoting Hammerschmidt v. United States, 265 U.S. 182, 188 (1924))). "The concept of 'fraud' includes the act of embezzlement, which is '"the fraudulent appropriation to one's own use of the money or goods entrusted to one's own care by another."'" Id. (quoting Grin v. Shine, 187 U.S. 181, 189 (1902)).

Fraud upon the court makes void the orders and the judgments of that court. It is also clear and well-settled Illinois law that any attempt to commit fraud upon the court vitiates the entire proceeding. The People of the State of Illinois v. Fred E. Sterling, 357 Ill.  354; 192 N.E. 229 (1934)   ( The maxim that fraud vitiates every transaction into which it enters applies to judgments as well as to contracts and other transactions.); Allen F. Moore v. Stanley F. Sievers, 336 Ill. 316; 168  N.E. 259 (1929)  ( The maxim that fraud vitiates every transaction into which it enters); In re Village of Willowbrook, 37 Ill. App.2d 393 (1962) ( It is axiomatic that fraud vitiates everything.) Dunham v. Dunham, 57 Ill. App. 475 (1984), affirmed 162 Ill. 589 (1896) ; Skelly Oil Co. v. universal Oil Products Co., 338 Ill. App. 79, 86 N.E. 2d 875,  883-4 (1949); Thomas v. Stasel v. The American Home Security Corporation, 362 Ill. 350; 199 N.E. 798 (1935). Under Illinois and Federal law, when any officer of the court has committed fraud upon the court. the orders and judgment of that court are void, of no legal force or effect.
Model Rule 4.2, provides: "During the course of representing a client a lawyer shall not communicate or cause another to communicate on the subject of the representation with a party the lawyer knows to be represented by another lawyer in that matter unless the first lawyer has obtained the prior consent of the lawyer representing such other party or as may otherwise be authorized by law."
On April 4th 2011, Page 8, question and answer  6, through 11, of said hearing on April 4th 2011, attorney Oefelein, known or should have known that she made fraudulent statements and  directed her client, Leonard to answer loaded  and leading questions that led  Leonard and attorney Oefelein into  subornation of perjury.  
Title 18 U.S.C. 1622
Whoever procures another to commit any perjury is guilty of subornation of perjury, and shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.
On April 4th 2011, Page 12, 13 attorney Oefelein, known or should have known that I (Patsy) am not able to support herself, fully without the support from Leonard
On April 4th 2011,  Page 11, of said hearing on April 4th 2011, attorney Oefelein, known and or should have known that Leonard, owns a helicopter business, buys and sells helicopters each and every year, he buys and sell stocks and bonds, he also owns a furniture store aside from receiving  half of his deceased wife Social Security and his full Social Security benefits, is a helicopter pilot, and owns a fleet of helicopters, with two or more employees, and that Leonard specializes in group tours, helicopter charter, and rides.
On April 4th 2011, Page 12, of said hearing, attorney Oefelein, known and should have known that she assisted her client into subornation of  perjury by fraudulently alleging that the Florida property,  which was a gift in Trust to me, during the marriage, that was discussed during Leonard, and my  deposition, and pre-trial, has now been fraudulently and illegally,  placed into the Judith Jablon Trust, and the Leonard Jablon Trust.
Endeavoring to suborn perjury. United States v. Kenny, 973 F.2d 339 (4th Cir. 1992); United States v. Casel, 995 F.2d 1299 (5th Cir. 1993), cert. denied, sub. nom. Jackson v. United States, 510 U.S. 1197 (1994); United States v. Tranakos, 911 F.2d 1225 (10th Cir. 1990); Falk v. United States, 370 F.2d 472 (9th Cir. 1966), cert. denied, 387 U.S. 926 (1967).
I, Relator, have never missed a court appearance during this divorce, but for some unexplained reason, attorney Tyson abruptly withdraw from my case, Judge Johnson and  attorney Oefelein, did not acknowledge my new attorney, Mr. Michael Moores appearance on March 22nd 2011, set up an April 4th 2011 court date without the knowledge of  myself or my  attorney Mr. Michael Moore, all to cover up the crimes against attorney Donald Sadowski.
April 4th 2011, page 8, of said hearing, numbers 6 through  11, attorney Oefelein, in open Court,  and under oath, questioned Leonard,  and assisted him into  subornation of  perjury and fraud by alleging that Leonard, did not acquire any real property and Leonard, and I, Patsy, never acquired property together
On April 4th 2011, page 10, of said hearing, number 2, attorney Oefelein, known or should have known, that she assisted her client, Leonard into subornation of  perjury, by  fraudulently alleging that his sons are emancipated.
On April 4th 2011, page 10 of said hearing, in open court, under oath, attorney Oefelein, known or should have known, that she assisted her client, Leonard into  subornation of perjury by assisting him in his fraudulent answers  to  number 5 through 15.
When an attorney willfully and intentionally assist his/her client into SUBORNATION of PERJURY  and FRAUD  in open court, under oath, that attorney is as guilty of subornation of  perjury and fraud as his/her
client, and should be disbarred and sanctioned.
[A] democracy is effective only if the people have faith in those who govern, and that faith is bound to be shattered when high officials and their appointees engage in activities which arouse suspicions of malfeasance and corruption. (United States v. Miss. Valley Generating Co., 364 U.S. 520, 562 [1961]).
All Defendants, failed to comply with a contract or the duty not to violate Constitutional rights, and a marriage contract, all defendants, known and should have known that they  participated in wrongdoing by covering up major fraud, participating in fraud upon the court, mail fraud, wire fraud, malfeasance, civil theft, , dereliction, malpractice, perversion,  injustice, infliction, evildoing, dishonesty, unjust enrichment , professional misconduct, breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty, illegal and deceptive practices,  bribery, and not one of them  reported the fraud , malpractice,  deception etc. to the proper authorities and I, Patsy has suffered unnecessary Severe emotional distress, as a direct and proximate result of all the defendants fraudulent, illegal, and deceptive practices/ schemes, they have violated Title 18 U.S.C. 1031,
the intangible right of honest services., United States v. Bohonus, 628 F.2d 1167, 1171 (C.A.9 1980).
This divorce case has been severely compromised, contaminated and therefore corrupted
April 4th 2011, Judge Moira Johnson-1836  used her official letterhead, in doing so, she committed major fraud upon the court a violation of Title 18 U.S.C. 1031, 1346 .
(see exhibit 46 and  exhibit 19)
It is well established in law that any attempt by an attorney, to deceive is considered fraud, and when the attempt to deceive occurs in a judicial proceeding, it is fraud upon the court. ( see Rules of Professional Conduct Rule 8.4.
IMPORTANT: The Supreme Court has ruled and has reaffirmed the principle that justice must satisfy the appearance of justice, Levine v. United States, 362 U.S. 610, 80 S.Ct. 1038 (1960), citing Offutt v. Untied States, 348 U.S. 11, 14, 75 S.Ct. 11,13 (1954).
On April 27th 2011, attorney Michael Moore filed with the Courts three (3) Motions.
a.  MOTION TO RECALL WARRANT, RELEASE BODY ATTACHMENT FOR CONTEMPT.
( see exhibit 18 )
b.  MOTION FOR SUBSTITUTION OF JUDGE       ( see exhibit 18 - 1 )
c.  MOTION TO VACATE JUDGMENT -2-1402     ( see exhibit 18 - 2 )
On March 30th 2011, attorney Tyson emailed me and requested that I can  picked up my files from her mailing address at 1803 W.  95th St. # 167., Chicago Il,  60643.
On or around April 5th 2011, opposing counsel ( Jessica Oefelein)  committed major fraud upon the court by filing this fraudulent document, Judgment for dissolution of marriage, by doing so, she violated Title 18 U.S.C. 1031, she violated Title 18 U.S.C. 1341 by using the U.S. Postal Service to send me this frivolous and fraudulent seven page document, JUDGMENT FOR DISSOLUTION OF MARRIAGE, in this document she (attorney Oefelein)  also violated Title 18 U.S.C. 1621, 1001 (see exhibit 46).
On July 11th 2011, I (Patsy) spoke with court reporter, Kathleen Bono  CSR , I asked Kathleen Bono, did she take Leonard Jablon, deposition, Kathleen Bono alleged she did, I requested a copy of Leonards deposition that was taken on June 8th 2010.
Kathleen Bono quoted a price of  $450.00 plus  another $178. 50  for her service and fee, she
( Kathleen Bono) alleged that she repeatedly attempted to contact attorney Tyson, via telephone, email, and fax for payment of $ 178. 50 for her service and fee for June 8th 2010, and if I (Patsy) wants a copy of Leonards deposition then I would have to pay $450.00  plus $178. 50 for her service and fee, that attorney Tyson neglected to pay. (see exhibit 100).
On May 4th 2011, Attorney Michael Moore and I (Patsy Jablon)  filed a motion before Judge Naomi H. Schuster, then submitted the three motions that was filed before the court on April 27th 2011
a.  MOTION TO RECALL WARRANT, RELEASE BODY ATTACHMENT FOR CONTEMPT.
( see exhibit 18 )
b.  MOTION FOR SUBSTITUTION OF JUDGE       ( see exhibit 18 - 1 )
c.  MOTION TO VACATE JUDGMENT -2-1402     ( see exhibit 18 - 2 )
Judge Naomi H. Schuster, later dismissed the case, alleging that Judges are elected officials and a Circuit Court Judge cannot rule against another Circuit Court Judge.

By dismissing the case, Judge Naomi H. Schuster, stated that all judges are elected officials, and no elected official can overrule or decide what another elected official has done.
On May 5th 2011, Strike from call ------  Allowed.
On May 18th 2011, MOTION DENIED, which violates Title 18 U.S.C. 1346 the intangible right of honest services., United States v. Bohonus, 628 F.2d 1167, 1171 (C.A.9 1980).
The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals held that the Circuit Court of Cook County is a criminal enterprise. U.S. v. Murphy, 768 F.2d 1518, 1531 (7th Cir. 1985).
The United States Supreme Court recently acknowledged the judicial corruption in Cook County, when it stated that Judge "Maloney was one of many dishonest judges exposed and convicted through 'Operation Greylord', a labyrinthine federal investigation of judicial corruption in Chicago". Bracey v. Gramley, case No. 96-6133 (June 9, 1997).

After reviewing my post, I have discovered this Is the wrong post, these are my notes, I guess that's what a divorce does to your mind when you've been screwed and abused by a corrupt court system.
So disregard this post, there will be an update.
Thanks.

Yeah, this is beginning to border on paranoia.  You may not like what happened to you in the divorce settlement, but it is what it is.  In all of your postings, you have failed to provide any credible allegations that wouldn't be thrown out in a court of law.  Moreover, now that you've provided your case and have been named, you've now opened yourself to a defamation lawsuit, especially to the Estate Attorney.  Even if there's a single portion of it that's true, the legal fees associated with defending yourself would about decimate whatever assets you have left.  Try and also remember you posted this to a public website and as such, the community is allowed to contribute their POV and are free to say things you may not like, and there's little you can do about that.  Attacking members of the community for their POV also makes you less than credible, and does nothing to promote your case.



Please move on, and best of luck to you....

At least Diogenes and the others coaxed very short rebuttals by this long winded OP. After her first 4 posts, I didn't think her capable of Twitter length responses.

Sounds like a made for tv movie!! No sane person is gonna read all this crap!! Get over yourself and move on with you life~

"8 Update By AuthorbeastAUTHOR: Corruption, Theft by Fraud, Bribery - Schaumburg (USA)SUBMITTED: Sunday, January 01, 2012POSTED: Sunday, January 01, 2012

who asked you anything beast.

Do you always dip your nose where it does not belong."

Now YOU are being a total jerk....when you post on a forum such as this, you had better be prepared to accept that rebuttals can and will be posted by anyone interested.  Even those you don't agree with....imagine that....right?  It IS the democratic way.



You come off as a smug, egotistical hypocrite who cries like a baby when she doesn't get her way.

No wonder the legal system disagrees with you.



No one is "dipping their nose in where it does not belong."  YOU invited comments with your original post, got it now?

who asked you anything beast.
Do you always dip your nose where it does not belong.

After trying to read your legal diatribe and Dio's remarks, I would have to say that the moron continues to be YOU, OP.  You are in serious need of a life.

you picked the name Diogenes, I can clearly see why you opinions are negative..

You are the weakest link... Good Bye..

P.S. the correct spelling is YOUR not YOU., ( spell check ).

who's the moron now.

Sounds like your main complaint is, you screwed up somewhere and aren't getting what you want out of the divorce settlement....right?



Kind of looks like all the "corrupt, bought off" officials you've dealt with, somehow, disagree.



Kind of looks like you pooped in your own nest.

Just how many times do you intend to post the particulars of this case on this website ??  And, exactly WHAT do you hope to accomplish by doing this ?? 

First of all, your posts contain so many spelling, grammatical and syntax errors that it is impossible to read and comprehend. And, no one is going to bother to read this pathetic piece of garbage, anyway.  In fact, I dare say, no one has the slightest bit of interest in either you, or your case.

I'm wondering, do you just enjoy posting the same misspelled, grammatically incorrect material over and over ?  Have you nothing better to do with your time than to take up bandwidth on a site where no one gives a crap about you, nor you case ??   Interesting.  Very interesting indeed.  Moron.

CORRUPTION, BRIBERY, FRAUD, LEGAL MALPRACTICE,  POSSIBLE PONZI SCHEME.
                                                                      
This is about a civil case/  complaint:           
                                                                           
 STATEMENT OF CASE:

To whom it may concern!

Brought by (Pat Jablon)that names a Judge, five attorneys and other as defendants; That alleges has numerous statutory causes of action against each defendant, such as fraud,  human, civil, and constitutional rights violations, corruption, bribery, million dollar +  payoffs.

I bring this suit pursuant to Title 42 U.S. Code 1983 for violations of certain protections guaranteed to me by the Fifth and fourteenth Amendments of the State Constitution by the defendants under color of law in their Capacity in the Courts of Cook County.

This letter is a complaint about my Illinois divorce, case #  09D8322, a multi-millionaire husband,  a crooked Judge and attorneys, whom my husband alleges that he paid a million plus dollars to Judge Moira Susan Johnson, and hundreds of thousand dollars to the attorneys in question to botch the case.

In Crook County Illinois, (cook county) there's an Estate Attorney name Donald Sadowski (Schaumburg. IL) who has committed fraud and other crimes that resembles a Ponzi scheme. he has misused his power by illegally removing my Florida gift home out of my unregistered Trust name. He then  placed my gift  home in another trust to allegedly off-set the balance of that trust, Afterwards, he allegedly paid Circuit Court Judge, Moira Susan Johnson (Richard J. Daley Center, Chicago Il) a million plus dollars and several attorneys in question: divorce attorney Joel Degrazia ( Schaumburg Il), divorce attorney Jessica Oefelein ( Schaumburg Il), divorce attorney Elliot Heidelberger (Hanover Park and Chicago Il), divorce attorney Learetta Tyson ( South Chicago Il) thousands of dollars to botch the divorce case and cover up the crime.   

If a Judge does not fully comply with the Constitution, then his/her order are void, In re Sawyer, 124 U.S. 200 (1888), he/she is without jurisdiction, and he/she has engaged in an act or acts of treason.

If anyone has an estate planning or business dealing with Estate attorney Donald Sadowski of Schaumburg Il, whos connected with And Alliance Bernstein Global Investor Service Inc.
I suggest you inspect and Investigate your Fund/Portfolio with this crook and get a second opinion.

Attorney Jessica Oefelein the opposing counsel, alleged that while residing with my husband, I allegedly took $10,000.00 from my shared residence, months later the opposing counsel decided to up the price from $10,000.00 to $16,000.00, she then aided and abetted  her client into perjury by now alleging that my Florida gift home which I located via the internet, purchased during our marriage is now his non-marital property, Judge Johnson aided this perjury and at the last minute the Judge combined the hearing and the trial together,  this corrupt  and bias Judge decided that I must pay for my own attorney after Judge Bellows ordered my husband to pay my attorney fees and maintenance, I was a house wife and husband was the sole provider, the corrupt Judge Johnson ordered that I walk away with nothing, she ordered that I make no claims toward my Florida gift home, she ordered that I pay my own credit card bills, she also placed my non-marital automobile on reserve Judge Johnson ordered that I must pay 10% of the $16000.00 or I will be in contempt of court, therefore a body warrant has been issued for my arrest while I was in the courtroom.

I have never missed a court appearance, Ive never obstruct justice, I jut set there dumb founded while my attorney Learetta Tyson screwed me over and made no objections. the body warrant was issued against me while I was in court and court was in session,  the session was not recorded, but is documented with the courts,  judge Johnson alleged that session was recorded, but there was no court reporter there on 2/8/2011. a clear  Judicial violation, and it enables me from filing criminal charges at this time until I can somehow pay this bogus  $1,600.00 contempt of court charge.

My attorney Learetta Tyson, who made little to no argument,  quit my case because of the alleged corruption,  she alleged that she is a civil rights attorney who helped bring down crooked lawyers and Judge, yet she allegedly took a bribe, she has since updated her website, now with video, unlike before.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L9HSR5EcuxI

After reporting Judge Susan Moira Johnson to the Judiciary review board, I was later told that she was answering to the charges, but no disciplinary action was taken. I later received a letter from the inquiry board stating that they have closed the case.

COMPLAINT AGAINST DEFENDANTS, ALLEGES AND AVERS AS FOLLOW;

1.  Leonard J. Jablon (hereafter, Respondent / defendant A )
2880 Aspen Rd.
Northbrook IL, 60062

2.  IL, Attorney Learetta Tyson  - 29534 - (hereafter, defendant B )
10540 S. Western Ave. Suite 310
Chicago, IL 60643

3.  IL, Attorney Jessica Oefelein ( Lagattuta, Degrazia & Oefelein  PC.) - 38490 - (hereinafter, defendant C)
1515 E. Woodfield Rd. Suite 880
Schaumburg, IL 60173-5437  (847) 240-5500

4.  IL, Attorney Joel Degrazia ( Lagattuta, Degrazia & Oefelein PC.) - 38990 - (hereinafter, defendant D)
1515 E. Woodfield Rd. Suite 880
Schaumburg, IL  60173-5437  (847) 240-5500

5.  IL, Attorney, Donald Sadowski (hereinafter, defendant E)
1515 E. Woodfield Rd. Suite 880
Schaumburg, IL 60173-5437 (847) 202-0700

6.  IL, Attorney Elliot Heidelberger - 24499 - (hereinafter, defendant F)
7225 Longmeadow Lane
Hanover Park, IL 60133-3730
                 And
20 N. Clark St. # 1725
Chicago, IL 60602-5000  (312) 443-8003

7. IL, Circuit Court Judge Moira Susan Johnson - 1836 - (hereafter, defendant G)
50 W. Washington Street, Suite 1902
Richard J. Daley Center
Chicago, IL 60602 ( 312 ) 603-6300

8. First Municipal District Circuit Court of Cook County ( hereafter, defendant H)
50 W. Washington Street, Suite 2600
Richard J. Daley Center
Chicago, IL 60602 (312) 603-6000

CHARLOTTE COUNTY FORECLOSURE ABSOLUTE AUCTION SITE

A.  On or around February 1st 2009, while surfing the internet, plaintiff came across a real foreclosure site Called the Charlotte County real foreclosure absolute auction site.

 INSTRUCTIONS

B.  All properties are sold AS IS. You must register on the web site and you are required to place a deposit equal to 5% of your estimated successful final bid.
Either on the Charlotte.realforeclosed.com website via electronic check (ACH) or in person with cash or cashiers check or money order payable to: CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT.

$10,000.00 DEPOSIT

C.  On or around February  4th 2009, defendant A, gave the Clerk of the Circuit Court a 10,000.00 deposit. via electronic check (ACH). For plaintiff dream home.

THE  TITLE

D.  The name on the Title was (The Mahoghanys Crystal Trust)With Leonard Jablon as Trustee.

E.  The successful bidder MUST pay the balance of the final bid PLUS the registry of the court service charge no later than 11:00AM EM  (THE NEXT BUSINESS DAY).

HIGHEST BIDDER

F.  On 05/11/2009.  We ( plaintiff and defendant )were the successful highest bidder for the Florida bank foreclosed home In the amount of  $186,100

CHECKS

G.  On 05/11/2009 plaintiff and defendant A, hurried to his banks and withdrew the checks from defendant A, personal / business accounts.

CASH ADVANCE

H.  Defendant A, also withdrew  $25,000.00  from one of his credit cards and rushed to the FedEx center to overnight the money to the Charlotte County Courthouse (see attachments).

STOCKS

I.  On May. 11, 2009 defendant A,   asked his accountant, Mr. Roger Rowe, to sell three small stocks from the Judith Jablon Trust.

OFFICIAL

J.  On 05/12/2009 the home located at :  5242 Fleming St. Port Charlotte Florida was plaintiff official dream/vacation home, According to the Charlotte County clerk of the courts.

REIMBURSEMENT

K.  On May 13th 2009, defendant A,  received the money from the stocks and deposit the money into his personal accounts to REIMBURSE HIMSELF for the purchase of my Florida dream home.
   (see attachments)

ORPORATE CREDIT CARD

L.  On 05/19/2009, plaintiff, defendant A, and plaintiff mother, flew (airplane) to Port Charlotte Florida for seven days to see and work on cleaning up the Florida property, and purchased items for plaintiff  property, all of which was paid for with my husbands corporate credit card.

SIGNING AND BACKDATED PRENUPTIAL

I.  On or around June 1st through June 5th 2009 plaintiff spoke to defendant E, via the telephone regarding plaintiff coming to defendant Es office and signing a pre-nuptial a couple of months after the marriage of plaintiff and defendant A, and a post- nuptial, and defendant E will backdate the pre-nuptial and plaintiff spoke about creating a new and joint trust for plaintiff and defendant A.

NEW AND JOINT TRUST

II.  Defendant E, refused to create a new and joint trust for plaintiff and defendant A, alleging that defendant As deceased wife trust (Judith Jablon )  is suffiencient  for both plaintiff and defendant A.

SECOND OPINION

III.  On or around June 5th 2009, Plaintiff  wanted a second opinion on backdating a pre-nuptial, and on the Judith Jablon trust, plaintiff asked defendant E, if she could bring an attorney to his office for a second opinion, defendant E, strongly stated NO.  

 TRANSFER TITLE.

IV.  On or around, June 5th 2009, defendant E, then asked plaintiff, if she would transfer TITLE from plaintiffs gifted Florida home into the Judith Jablon trust to ensure that plaintiff and defendant A, stay married until death, plaintiff said yes, but only after plaintiff  gets a second opinion on the Judith Jablon trust, defendant E, strongly suggested NO second opinions.

SECOND OPINION

V.  What is so wrong with getting a second opinion on a legal Trust, what is so secretive about this Trust that would make defendant E, go nuts, has defendant E, stolen money from this Trust that he dont want defendant A, to know about.

COERCED

1.  Defendant E,  coerced defendant A, via the telephone with defendant A, speaker on,  to NOT allow plaintiff to get a second opinion regarding the Judith Jablon Trust and to persuade her to sign over her  Florida gift home or they, defendant A and E, will go to jail for the misuse of the Judith Jablon trust and defendants C and D will go to jail for the cover up.

MURDER THREAT.

2.  Plaintiff then refused to go to defendant Es office, after many failed attempts from defendant E to defendant A, to bring plaintiff to his office, defendant E, alleged that he will get  plaintiff at all cost including threats of murder, ( see Donald Sadowski, ARDC, complaint ) alleging that plaintiff  has crossed the line because plaintiff refused to be apart of his (defendant E)  fraudulent and illegal scheme to sign  fraudulent documents, so he could  backdate the pre-nuptial document and sign over title of the Florida home.

3.  This made plaintiff  very suspicious, plaintiff asked defendant A, if she could get a copy of the Judith Jablon trust to get a second opinion on the Judith  Jablon trust, defendant A, said sure, he went on to say that the Judith Jablon trust is a simple land trust just like defendant A, the only difference is, the Judith Jablon trust has more property in it then the Leonard Jablon trust, defendant A, then produced both trusts to plaintiff to copy and get a second opinion.

FAILED ATTEMPTS

4.  Plaintiff then refused to go to defendant Es office, after many failed attempts from defendant E to defendant A, to bring plaintiff to his office, defendant E, alleged that he will get  plaintiff at all cost including threats of murder, alleging that plaintiff  has crossed the line because plaintiff refused to be apart of his (defendant E)  fraudulent and illegal scheme to sign  fraudulent documents, so he could  backdate the pre-nuptial document and sign over title of the Florida home.

FRAUDULENT CONCEALMENT  (DIVORCE)

I.  On or around June 8th 2009, after all else failed, defendant E,  coerced ( defendant A) to secretly divorce plaintiff, for not complying with his fraudulent schemes and he (defendant E) will see to it that the other attorneys defendant C, and D will falsely charge plaintiff with abandonment , fraud, and other illegal tactics, including stealing the Judith Jablon wedding ring, the same ring that defendant A, married plaintiff with and defendant A, admitted this in his deposition on June 8th 2010.

BACKDATING DOCUMENTS

II.  On June 16th 2009, plaintiff got a second opinion from attorney Larry Mraz of

Roselle IL.

III.  On or around June 16th 2009, plaintiff  explained the conversation  between herself and attorney Sadowski to attorney Mraz, plaintiff asked attorney Mraz, if he would  create a duplicate Trust  like the Judith Jablon land Trust and defendant A, land trust,  attorney Mraz explained to plaintiff  that he  did not want to get involved with or affiliate himself  with any attorney who backdates documents, he explained that the two TRUSTS were not the same, he explained the difference between the two trusts,  he also explained that the Judith Jablon Trust was not a simple land Trust as Attorney Sadowski alleged, he explained that the Judith Jablon Trust was a marital and a residuary Trust  and had a million plus dollars in it, he then (attorney Mraz) referred me to attorney Elliot Heidelberger.

Plaintiff has accidentally uncovered a crime of stolen money from a deceased womans Trust allegedly committed by Attorney Donald Sadowski that resembles a Ponzi Scheme. (see attached.)

NEW LIVING WILL

IV.  On or around July 7th 2009, defendant A, went to attorney Sadowski office, then came back to the Northbrook home with a new Living Will, that was backdated to the year 2000. Defendant A, stated that the new Living Will didnt take long to create and backdate, plaintiff asked defendant A, if she could make a copy of it, defendant A, said yes and gave plaintiff the new living will to copy.

VICIOUSLY ATTACKED

V.  On June 21ST  2009, Fathers Day, plaintiff was in bed with defendant A, when defendant A, son Joseph bust through the bedroom door and viciously attacked plaintiff, alleging that a few days prior, he overheard defendant E, telling defendant A,  that they were going to tell the courts that plaintiff has stolen money from the Judith Trust and secretly purchased a Florida dream home for herself, plaintiff put a restraining order against defendant A, son Joseph, he was not allowed in the Northbrook residence. (see police report).

CREDIT CARD ADDITION

VI.  On June 30th 2009, defendant A, drove plaintiff to Costco Warehouse to add her on his Costco account, defendant A, submitted his identification card,  plaintiff  submitted her identification card with her maiden name (Hausley) appearing on her I.D.
Plaintiff was given an American Express card from Costco.

FRAUDULENT CONCEALMENT,  ILLEGAL AND DECEPTIVE PRACTICE

A.  On June 2009 through September 2009, (defendant E) engaged in fraud, and conversion, deceptive practices that  resembles a Ponzi Scheme  regarding the Judith Jablons Trust, backdating documents, civil theft of plaintiff Florida home, secretly and illegally causing defendant A to file for a divorce under fraudulent concealment, which led to irreparable damage to plaintiff and defendant As marriage.

BRIBERY, NEGLIGENCE


B.  On September 2nd 2009, plaintiff, was told by defendant A, that defendant F, took a bribe from him to botch this divorce case so that the Judge will rule in defendant A, favor regarding plaintiff  Florida home and the outcome of the divorce proceedings.

ATTORNEY WICKER

C.  On or around September 5th 2009, plaintiff contacted the Florida attorney John Wicker who originally set up plaintiffs land Trust and asked him to check with the Florida Courts and see if plaintiffs gift home was fraudulently and illegally taken from her trust by defendants A and E.

MOTION TO AMEND TITLE

D.  On September 8th 2009, attorney Wicker stated that there was a MOTION TO AMEND TITLE filed on
June 16th 2009, by defendant E, fraudulently Alleging  that defendant A, mistakenly put the Florida home in the Mahoganys Crystal Trust , fraudulently  alleging that it was a non-existent Trust.

INTERCEPT

E.  September 8th 2009, Attorney Wicker then asked if  plaintiff  wanted him to go to court and intercept the process. Plaintiff  stated to attorney Wicker that  she  did, and I (plaintiff) have a divorce attorney name attorney Elliot Heidelberger,  you (attorney Wicker) and he (Elliot Heidelberger) can discuss legal procedures on how to keep plaintiffs Florida home in plaintiffs Trust.

MOTION TO AMEND TITLE

F. On September 8th 2009, attorney Wicker emailed plaintiff the documents (MOTION TO AMEND TITLE)  plaintiff immediately forwarded the documents to attorney Heidelberger.

FRAUDULENT CONCEALMENT, BREACH OF CONTRACT, NEGLIGENCE;

G. On September 8th 2009, and up until his release,  defendant F, ignored all requests made by plaintiff , to him and through his paralegal, to speak with attorney Wicker regarding what documents to file from Illinois to Florida that would make the Florida Courts aware of  the fraud between defendant A, and defendant E,  and that plaintiffs Trust does exists because the signed trust was not registered with the courts yet, estate attorney Donald Sadowski had destroyed the signed trust.

COURT ORDER VIOLATION

H. In October 2009  Defendant A, has stopped paying the co-payment on  plaintiff medical bills, he has stopped the temporary maintenance, that was a direct order from the Courts, during the divorce proceedings, under the fraudulent advice of his attorneys, defendant C, and defendant D, has filed frivolous orders to the courts, aiding and abetting defendant A,  into perjury alleging fraud  by plaintiff to defendant A. ( defamation of character).

 1.  Citizens for Legal Responsibility
      Some Illinois Attorney Disciplinary Orders

      LAGATTUTA & DeGRAZIA, P.C.

2.  People of the State of Illinois v. Eddie Williams

FAILURE TO REPORT FRAUD AND CONVERSION TO THE PROPER AUTHORITY, FRAUDULENT AND ILLEGAL CONCEALMENT, NEGLIGENCE AND BREACH OF CONTRACT

I.   In June 2009, and up until his release,  after reviewing plaintiff  documents/proof,  defendant F, did not report the fraudulent and the illegal activities that was committed by defendants  A , C, D and E  to the Proper Authorities, including but not limited to  the misuse of the Judith Jablon Trust, and the fraudulent documents produced by defendants A and E, to the Florida Court, and the Cook County Courts, regarding the Mahoganys Crystal Trust and this fraudulent and illegal  concealment allowed defendants A, C, D, and E, to illegally and fraudulently defraud the Florida and the Cook County Court.

FRAUD AND CONVERSION, CIVIL THEFT, UNJUST ENRICHMENT

J. On or around October 2009, Defendant E, fraudulently  alleged to the Florida Court that the Mahoganys Crystal Trust does not exists and fraudulently alleged to have placed an undivided 54.72% interest in the Leonard J. Jablon Trust  ( defendant A )  and fraudulently alleged to have placed an undivided 45.28% interest in the Judith Jablons Trust, ( defendant  As  deceased wife )  defendant F, known or should have known that the Florida property was a gift in Trust to plaintiff,  purchased during plaintiffs and defendant As, marriage and by defendant F, not reporting this to the Proper Authorities, he concealed and allowed this illegal and fraudulent activity to happen , defendant E and defendant A, directed a conspiracy and scheme in which they filed and caused to be filed fraudulent and illegal documents to the Florida  and the Cook County Court, (a violation of the court order).

FLORIDA ATTORNEY

K.  On September 13th 2009 plaintiff spoke to attorney John Wicker, via the internet regarding computer hacking by defendant A, and he suggest that plaintiff  purchase a spy ware program call eblaster for protecting plaintiffs privacy  from her husband, while on the computer.

CONSPIRACY TO DEFRAUD, CIVIL THEFT, UNJUST ENRICHMENT

L.  On or around October 2009, defendants A, C, D, E, AND F, conspired and caused to conspire documents that was fraudulently filed and used to obtain the Florida gift home from the Florida Court to take the home out from plaintiff trust and placed into defendant A, wife trust, and used said fraudulent documents to  illegally file,  conceal, then  defrauded the Cook County Court.

www.judicialview.com/State.../Snyder-v-Elliot-Heidelberger/44/3268.

CONSULTATION

M.  On November 30th 2009, plaintiff had an appointment for a consultation with defendant B, plaintiff wanted a second (2nd) opinion regarding plaintiffs  Florida home, and the legalities of defendant F, allowing  defendant A and defendant E, to fraudulently  and illegally remove plaintiff Florida home from plaintiff  trust, which was a gift in Trust, and why defendant F, did not report the fraud to the  Proper Authority, plaintiff gave (defendant B) all court documents that was in her possession regarding plaintiff Florida home, and  the documents pertaining to the divorce with respondent

DECEPTIVE PRACTICE

N. On November 30th 2009,  defendant B, stated to plaintiff that she can clearly see that defendant F, was fraudulently and illegally screwing plaintiff over and that plaintiff should file a complaint against him with the ARDC, plaintiff asked who are they and what could they do for plaintiff.

ARDC

O. On November 30th 2009,  defendant B, stated that they are the Attorney registration and disciplinary commission.

P.  On November 30th 2009, defendant B, alleged that once the ARCD reads plaintiffs complaint and if attorney Heidelberger (defendant F) have money in his account that the ARDC will make him pay you (plaintiff) for your Florida home.

Q, plaintiff asked defendant B, if she would take my case, defendant B, stated that she would, but first plaintiff has to fire defendant F.

NEW ATTORNEY

R.  On November 30th 2009, Defendant B, quoted plaintiff her retainer fee 0f  $3,475.00  and said she defendant B will take the case but plaintiff first has to fire defendant F.

FIRED THROUGH EMAIL

S.  On December 1st 2009 plaintiff emailed attorney Heidelberger (defendant F) and fired him.

RETAINER

I.  On or around December 2009, plaintiff borrowed money from her good friend, to retain defendant B.

On  December 15th 2009, a motion of Elliot Heidelberger to withdraw as attorney for the petitioner.

SET FOR STATUS

January 15th 2009,  the matter for Elliot Heidelberger to withdraw was set for status.

ATTORNEY CLIENT AGREEMENT

II. On January 27th 2010  plaintiff, signed an Attorney Client Agreement with defendant B, and paid a retainer in the sum of $3,475.00.

NEW YORK

III.  On February 2010, plaintiff went to New York, to get away from the corrupt divorce proceeding that were taken place, while there plaintiff,  sold some of her old Jewelry that she purchased many years prior to meeting defendant A,  that was stored at her Schaumburg apartment, because defendant A, violated  the Judges order for maintenance, and he should have been held in contempt of court.

PROPER AUTHORITIES

IV.  In February 2010, , and up until her release, after reviewing plaintiff  documents/proof,  defendant B, did not report the fraud, the conversion and the illegal activities that was committed by defendants A, C, D and E, to the Proper Authorities, including but not limited to the misuse of the Judith Jablon Trust, and the fraudulent documents produced by defendants A and E, to the Florida Court, regarding the Mahoganys Crystal Trust and this fraudulent and illegal  concealment allowed defendants A, C, D and E, to illegally and fraudulently defraud the Florida and the Cook County Court, a violation of the court order.

ILLEGAL EVIDENCE

V.  On March 1st 2010 defendant B, called plaintiff and informed her that she had talked to defendant C, and was informed that  defendant A,  has fraudulently hacked into plaintiffs computer and they have copies of all of plaintiffs and defendant A, nude pictures that was taken from plaintiffs digital camera and downloaded onto plaintiffs personal computer, and defendant C, plans to use the fraudulent and illegal evidence against you ( plaintiff) in Court.

DEPOSITION

VI.   On June 8TH  2010, in defendant A, deposition, defendant A, stated that he married plaintiff  with the Judith Jablon wedding ring.

TRANSFER JUDGES

I.  On July 19th  2010, (defendant D) file a motion to transfer Judge, from Judge Bellows Courtroom 1602,   to  Judge Johnsons Courtroom 1903.

DECEPTIVE PRACTICE

II.  On September 1st 2010, plaintiff asked defendant B, why did opposing counsel change judge, (defendant B) deceptively alleged that she changed Judge, without plaintiffs approval/knowledge.

BREACH OF CONTRACT, NEGLIGENCE

III.  On   or around September 1st 2010, plaintiff  over heard defendant B, discussing a conversation that was between plaintiff and plaintiffs friend Ronald Friedman, to the opposing counsel, defendant C, telling defendant C that  plaintiff, plaintiffs daughter and plaintiff friend had lunch together, defendant C, later that day used an innocent lunch against plaintiff  and plaintiffs friend during questioning, alleging that plaintiff and her friend are lovers.

BRIBERY

IV.  September 2010, defendant A,  continually revealed to plaintiff that he is illegally paying defendant B to botch the divorce case to go in his favor.

BRIBERY, BREACH OF CONTRACT, NEGLIGENCE

V. On September 1st 2010,  Defendant B, alleged that she must withdraw as plaintiff attorney, after several attempts by plaintiff, defendant B, never answered yes or no to the bribery allegations that she did not take a bribe from defendants  A, C,D,E, and F, but defendant B, insinuated that defendant G, (Judge Susan Moira Johnson did.)

PRE-TRIAL,  DECEPTIVE PRACTICE AND BREACH OF CONTRACT, NEGLIGENCE.

A.  On September 1st 2010, (defendant B) never informed plaintiff that this was the day for pre-trial, never prepared plaintiff for the pre-trial hearing,  defendant B never discussed questions that would be asked during the pre-trial hearing, there was never a trial.

DEPRIVATION, NEGLIGENCE, OBSTRUCTING JUSTICE

B.  On September 1st 2010 defendant B,  and defendant G, deceptively deprived plaintiff of her right to allow plaintiffs witness to testify on plaintiffs behalf, claiming that it was too late for witness to testify.

PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE

C.  On September 1st 2010 defendant B, fraudulently alleged in her billing statement that there was a pre-trial conference; entered into settlement negotiations - parties did not settle hearing scheduled for September 8th 2010.

PRE-TRILA NEGOTIATIONS

D.  On September 1st 2010, plaintiff, did not attend a pre-trial conference, alleged by (defendant B), plaintiff was unaware of a pre-trial conference, plaintiff was unaware of any negotiations.


PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE
E.  On September 8th 2010, there was never a pretrial conference,
Plaintiff was never aware of a  PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE, OR A TRIAL ever taken place during this divorce that was alleged by (defendant B).

PLAINTIFFS TESTIMONY NOT RECORDED

F.  In September 2010 while plaintiff  was being questioned under oath ,defendant B, deliberately asked the type of questions that allowed defendant C, to object , so plaintiffs testimony would not be recorded.

ATTORNEY FEES

G.  In September  2010, defendant B, written a bogus fee petition for respondent to pay attorney fees, defendant G asked that she re-write it.

NEGLIGENCE, SPOILATION   (OF EVIDENCE )

I.  On or around September 30th 2010, defendant B, did not present plaintiffs proof/ documents into evidence, alleging that defendant G ordered her not to submit..  Depriving plaintiff of the right to present evidence further disabling plaintiff with emotional stress.

OBSTRUCTING JUSTICE, NEGLIGENCE,  DEPRIVATION

II.  On or around September, 30th 2010, again, defendants B, and G, deceptively deprived plaintiff of the right to allow plaintiffs witnesses to testify on plaintiffs behalf.

FRAUD AND CONVERSION ON  FORECLOSED DOCUMENTS, UNJUST ENRICHMENT

III.  On November 22nd 2010 Plaintiff  testified that defendant A, and defendant C and D,  committed fraud and conversion  by conspiring to file documents with the Illinois Circuit Court, alleging that defendant As helicopter company was bank foreclosed, when instead defendant A  and defendant C and D, transferred defendant A, helicopter business out of his name and into the name of defendant As friends company name (Dan Asher).    (see attachments).

DEPOITION TRANSCRIPT

IV.  On November 30th 2010, plaintiff, requested a copy of defendant A, deposition transcript, defendant B, deceptively alleges that plaintiff fee for a copy would cost $2, 250. 00   plus  $178. 00. (I have the email).

CHANGE OF COURT DATE

V.  On January 25th 2011, plaintiff  went to court, on her scheduled court date in courtroom 1903, plaintiff was told by Judge Johnsons clerk that Judge Johnson was presiding in court room 1602, plaintiff went to court room 1602, then was told by defendant G (judge Johnson ) and not told by defendant B that plaintiff court date was changed to February 8th 2011.

CHANDE OF COURT DATE

VI.  Defendant B, never informed  plaintiff  that the January 25th 2011, court date was changed to February 8th 2011.

CHANGE JUDGES

VII.  February 2011 plaintiff discovered that (defendant D) filed the motioned to change Judge, and not defendant B as she alleged.

FRAUDULENT CONCEALMENT, ILLEGAL AND DECEPTIVE PRACTICE, CONSPIRACY AND NEGLIGENCE

VIII.   On February 8th 2011, (defendant B), re-wrote her fee petition after conspiring with defendant C and defendant G, to defraud the Cook County Court, and filing illegal and fraudulent documents, then defendant G, tried to Purged the documents. (fee petition for defendant A, to pay denied).

NO COURT REPORTER

A.  On February 8th 2011, There was NO Court reporter during session, session was not recorded.


DECEPTIVE  PRACTICE,  FRAUDULENT CONCEALMENT

B.   On February 8th 2011, defendant B, did not make any arguments on behalf of  plaintiff ,  for  the return of plaintiffs Florida home, located at: 5242 Fleming St, Port Charlotte Fl. 33981, which was a gift in Trust.

DUE PROCESS

C.  Plaintiff was not  given a fair hearing in a State Court proceeding, deprivation of property without due process.

2001 NISSAN ALTIMA

D.  On February 8th 2011, a frivolous order was issued by defendant C, and granted by defendant G, for plaintiffs 2001 Nissan Altima to be reserved, a vehicle that was purchased/ paid in full during plaintiffs first marriage in 2005. (non-marital property),  also the same vehicle in which Judge Bellows  in October, 2009, ordered that defendant A, cannot take because that was plaintiffs vehicle before the marriage.

The Court in Yates v. Village of Hoffman Estates, Illinois, 209 F. Supp. 757 (N.D. ILL. 1962) held that not every action by a Judge is in exercise of his Judicial function. it is not a judicial function for a Judge to commit a intentional tort even though the tort occurs in the courthouse. When a judge acts as a trespasser of the law, when a judge does not follow the law, the judge loses subject-matter jurisdiction and the judges orders are void, of no legal force or effect.

LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCY

E.  On February 8th 2011, defendant B, and defendant G, allowed defendant C, to file a fraudulent motion for law enforcement agency to comply, while plaintiff was in the courtroom, without regards to habeas corpus.

STAY OF EXERCUTION

F On February 8th 2011, defendant B and defendant G, allowed defendant C, to fraudulently and illegally filed through the Circuit Court of Cook County, while plaintiff was in the courtroom, a stay of Execution (allowed).

ATTORNEY FEES

G.  On February 8th 2011, defendant B, filed her petition for attorney fees to be paid by defendant A, which somehow was denied, petition for attorney fees to be paid by plaintiff, was somehow allowed the sum of over $19,000.00 defendant A, B and defendant C and G, was aware that plaintiff is indigent.

FINANCIAL STATEMENT, FRAUDULENT CONCEALMENT

H.  On or before February 8th 2011, defendant B, didnt submit plaintiffs, January 2011, financial disclosure statement to the Court, alleging that defendant G ordered her not to.

PARTY TO PURGE

I.  On February 8th 2011,  defendant C,  motioned for PARTY TO PURGE  (allowed by defendant G).

WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY, BREACH OF CONTRACT, NEGLIGENCE

1. On or around March 4th 2011, defendant B,  filed a motion, substitution  and/ or withdrawal of attorney from the petitioners case, after many months of threatening to remove herself from plaintiffs case, after plaintiff questioned defendant B, regarding a bribe that defendant A, alleges she took, defendant B, alleged that there is a bribe on the table, but she defendant  B, didnt take the bribe, but insinuated that a higher Authority did (defendant G).

Any judge or attorney who does not report a judge for treason as required by law may themselves be guilty of misprison of treason, 18 U.S.C. Section 2382.

REAONABLE DEGREE OF CARE OR SKILL IN REPRESENTING HER CLIENT

2.  On March 2010, through March 2011, defendant B, failed to exercise a reasonable degree of care or skill in representing her client,.

FRAUDULENT CONCEALMENT, DECEPTIVE PRACTICE , NEGLIGENCE AND BREACH OF CONTRACT.

3.  On or around March 9th 2011, defendant F, mailed plaintiff, a bill, fraudulently alleging that plaintiff owe him several thousand dollars For his services which the court ordered defendant A, to pay, and defendant A, paid plaintiffs attorney fees to defendant F.  (see attachment).

NEW ATTORNEY.

4.  On March 10th 2011, plaintiffs family hired an attorney by the name of Michael Moore, who was present on the next court date which was March 22nd 2011.

NEW ATTORNEY, MICHAEL MOORE

5.  On March 22nd 2011, plaintiffs new attorney Michael Moore, appeared before the court, to file his appearance and to address the fraudulent and illegal  contempt of Court, and default  charge that was illegally placed on plaintiff,  attorney, Mr. Michael Moore was given twenty one days to file his written appearance.

FAILED TO FILE AN APPEARANCE

6.  March 22nd 2011, defendant C,  entered another fraudulent default order against the Petitioner/Counter-Respondent, (fraudulently) alleging  that Petitioner/Counter-Respondent failed to file an appearance and answer for March 22nd 2011.

FRAUD, CONSPIRACY , NEGLIGENCE, DECEPTIVE PRACTICE , SCHEME , CIVIL THEFT AND UNJUST ENRICHMENT

7.  On April 4th  2011, defendant C and G  directed a conspiracy and scheme, in which they fraudulently filed and caused to file  fraudulent and illegal documents ( Judgment for dissolution of marriage) through the Cook County Court that Plaintiff/Counter-Respondent was in default,  and that Plaintiff/Counter-petitioner was personally served an order of default papers on February 9th 2011.

Judges have given themselves judicial immunity for their judicial functions. Judges have no judicial immunity for criminal acts, aiding, assisting, or conniving with others who perform a criminal act, or for their administrative/ministerial duties. When a judge has a duty to act, he does not have discretion - he is then not performing a judicial act, he is performing a ministerial act.

8.  Plaintiffs divorce case has been Severely Compromised and therefore Corrupted.

FRAUD AND CONVERSION, DECEPTIVE PRACTICE,  NEGLIGENCE, CONSPIRACY,SCHEME, UNJUST ENRICHMENT

9.  On April 4th  2011, defendants , C and G, directed a conspiracy and scheme, in which she filed and caused to file this frivolous document  ( Judgment  for dissolution of marriage) through the Cook County Court that petitioners Florida home, which is a gift in Trust, and bought during plaintiff and defendant As marriage, has been illegally and fraudulently Turned into defendant As,  non-marital property and percentages were placed into defendant A,  and defendant As deceased wife (Judith Jablon) Trust.

Any Judge who does not comply with his/her Oath to the Constitution of the United States wars against that Constitution and engages in acts in violation of the Supreme Law of the Land. The Judge is engaged in acts of treason. Having taken at least two, if not three, oaths of office to support the Constitution of the United States, and the Constitution of the State of Illinois, any Judge who has acted in violation of the Constitution is engaged in an act or acts of treason.

SWORN OATHS

10.  All defendants ( attorneys and the Judge)  in question, has taken  SWORN OATHS OF OFFICE to uphold the law, yet they have broken an abundance of laws in THIS case, all defendants should be Audited, Disbarred, and Sanctioned.

Any judge or attorney who does not report a judge for treason as required by law may themselves be guilty of misprison of treason, 18 U.S.C. Section 2382.

NO CONTACT RULE    

A. On April 4th 2011,  by defendant C, own admission, on page 2 of said hearing, misrepresented the Courts by fraudulently alleged that she (defendant C ) as a courtesy, sent a copy and notice of todays hearing and the order of default to attorney Michael Moore and Mrs. Jablon, (plaintiff)  (see attached).

NO  CONTACT   RULE.     

B.  Mrs. Jablon,  (plaintiff)  had an attorney, by the name of Michael Moore, there would have been NO need to send a copy and notice to plaintiff.

HEARING FOR DEFAULT

C.  Plaintiff or her attorney Mr. Michael Moore, has NEVER received a Copy of the hearing for default prove-up set forth on April 4th 2011 and the Divorce was granted on that date.

D.  Defendant A, was a great husband, and plaintiff has never used her ex-boyfriend or her ex-husband as a comparison to defendant A.

PERJURY, AND MISSUSE OF THE JUDITH JABLON TRUST

E.  On April 4th 2011, Page 7, of said hearing, if  defendant A, has suffered stress or anxiety, and loss of sleep, its because of the fraudulent  concealment and illegal practice that has taken place and the misuse of the Judith Jablon Trust, the perjury committed and defendant A, is in fear of being audited and sanctioned as a proximate result.

PERJURY, NEGLIGENCE AND FRAUD AND CONVERSION

F.  On April 4th 2011, Page 8, question and answer  6, through 11, of said hearing on April 4th 2011, defendant C, known or should have known that she made frivolous statements and  directed her client (defendant A,)  to answer loaded  and leading questions, aiding and abetting  defendant A, and defendant C into Perjury.  


BUSINES OWNER

G. On April 4th 2011,  Page 11, of said hearing on April 4th 2011, defendant C, known and or should have known that defendant A, owns a helicopter business, buys and sells helicopters each and every year, he buys and sell stocks and bonds, he also owns a furniture store aside from receiving  half of his deceased wife Social Security and his full Social Security benefits, is a helicopter pilot, and owns a fleet of helicopters, with two or more employees, and that defendant A, specializes in group tours, helicopter charter, and rides.

INDIGENT

H.  On April 4th 2011, Page 12, defendant C, known and should have known that plaintiff is not able to support herself, fully without the support from defendant A.

FRAUD, DECEPTIVE PRACTICE, NEGLIGENCE,   AND PERJURY

I. On April 4th 2011, Page 12, of said hearing, defendant C,  known and should have known that she aided and abetted her client into perjury by fraudulently alleging that the Florida property,  which was a gift in Trust to plaintiff, during the marriage, that was discussed during defendant A, and plaintiff deposition, and pre-trial, has now been fraudulently and illegally,  placed into the Judith Jablon Trust, and the Leonard Jablon Trust.

WORLD POINT CREDIT CARD

J.  Plaintiff, was not issued a world point visa credit card, after separating from defendant A.

FRAUDULENT CONCEALMENT

K.  Plaintiff, has never missed a court appearance during this divorce, but somehow defendant C and defendant G, set up an April 4th 2011 court date without the knowledge of  plaintiff  or her  attorney Mr. Michael Moore.

REAL PROPERTY

L.  April 4th 2011, page 8, of said hearing, numbers 6 through  11, defendant C, in open Court,  and under oath, question defendant A,  and assisted him into  perjury, fraud and conversion by alleging that defendant A, did not acquire any real property and defendant A, and plaintiff never acquired property together.

EMANCIPATED

M.  On April 4th 2011, page 10, of said hearing, number 2, defendant C, known or should have known, that she assisted her client ( defendant A) into perjury, by  fraudulently alleging that his sons are emancipated.

PERJURY, DECEPTIVE PRACTICE, NEGLIGENCE, AND FRAUD

N.  On April 4th 2011, page 10 of said hearing, in open court, under oath, defendant C, known or should have known, that she assisted her client, (defendant A,) into  perjury by assisting him in his fraudulent answers  to  number 5 through 15.

PERJURY , FRAUD AND CONVERSION

O.  When an attorney willfully and intentionally assist his/her client into PERJURY,  FRAUD  AND CONVERSION in open court, under oath, that attorney is as guilty of perjury,  fraud and conversion  as his/her client, and should be disbarred and sanctioned.

Q.  On July 11th 2011, Kathleen Bono quoted a price of  $450. 00 plus another $178. 50  for her service and fee, she ( Kathleen Bono) alleged that she repeatedly attempted to contact defendant B, via telephone, email, and fax for payment of $ 178. 50 for her service and fee for June 8th 2010  deposition, and if I (plaintiff) wants a copy of defendant A, deposition then plaintiff would have to pay $450. 00  plus $178. 50 for her service and fee, that defendant B, neglected to pay.

CONTRACT

T.  All Defendants, failed to comply with a contract and or their sworn oath of  duty not to violate Constitutional rights, and a marriage contract, all defendants, known and should have known that they  participated in wrongdoing by covering up fraud, discrimination and conversion, participated in fraud and conversion, malfeasance, civil theft, negligence, dereliction, malpractice, perversion,  injustice, infliction, evildoing, dishonesty, unjust enrichment , professional misconduct, defamation of character, breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty, illegal and deceptive practices,  bribery, and not one of them  reported the fraud , conversion , malpractice,  deception etc. to the proper authorities and plaintiff has suffered unnecessary Severe emotional distress, as a direct and proximate result of all the defendants fraudulent, illegal, and deceptive practices/ schemes, AND THEY SHOULD BE SANCTIONED.

Plaintiff has contact the ILARDC,  regarding the attorneys in question, they refuse to investigate, they went as far as to say in their letter to me quote that there is no attorney registered to practice law in Illinois with the name Learetta Tyson or a similar name, end quote yet Attorney Learetta Tyson has been practicing in Illinois for twenty years or more.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L9HSR5EcuxI

IN RE J.H., A MINOR
(THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, PETITIONER-APPELLEE,
v.
RUTH H., RESPONDENT, (ALMA LEARETTA TYSON, COUNSEL FOR MOTHER-RESPONDENT, APPELLANT)).

Plaintiff has exhausted all finances.

This divorce case has been severely compromised, contaminated and therefore corrupted, I would like my divorce re- tried. All defendants has ruin my life My husband and I are very cordial with each other, I am not paranoid, my allegations are the Truth and nothing but.My divorce was illegally obtained, therefore, I dont know if  Im still married or am I illegally divorced.

The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals held that the Circuit Court of Cook County is a criminal enterprise. U.S. v. Murphy, 768 F.2d 1518, 1531 (7th Cir. 1985). The United States Supreme Court recently acknowledged the judicial corruption in Cook County, when it stated that Judge "Maloney was one of many dishonest judges exposed and convicted through 'Operation Greylord', a labyrinthine federal investigation of judicial corruption in Chicago". Bracey v. Gramley, case No. 96-6133 (June 9, 1997).

I have an abundance amount of Proof/Documents, everything but the payoff, I just have my husbands word.I am seeking a contingency lawyer to file a lawsuit. I have sent my complaint to every government official that I can think of and to this no avail.

I am seeking to file my complaint in Cook County Circuit Court, ASAP.

 The Cook County States Attorney office (Anita Alverez) alleges that you must first file a police report before they can file charges, but this crooked Judge Moira Susan Johnson blocked me from filing a police report by placing this Bogus body warrant on me for contempt of court in order to cover-up her crimes.


Thank you

Pat J
e-mail: [email protected]

   CORRUPTION, BRIBERY, FRAUD, LEGAL MALPRACTICE,  POSSIBLE PONZI SCHEME.
                                                                      
This is about a civil case/  complaint:           
                                                                             STATEMENT OF CASE:
       To whom it may concern!

Brought by (Pat )that names a Judge, five attorneys and other as defendants;

That alleges has numerous statutory causes of action against each defendant, such as fraud,  human, civil, and constitutional rights violations, corruption, bribery, million dollar +  payoffs.

I bring this suit pursuant to Title 42 U.S. Code 1983 for violations of certain protections guaranteed to me by the Fifth and fourteenth Amendments of the State Constitution by the defendants under color of law in their Capacity in the Courts of Cook County.

This letter is a complaint about my Illinois divorce, case #  09D8322, a multi-millionaire husband,  a crooked Judge and attorneys, whom my husband alleges that he paid a million plus dollars to Judge Moira Susan Johnson, and hundreds of thousand dollars to the attorneys in question to botch the case.

In Crook County Illinois, (cook county) there's an Estate Attorney name Donald Sadowski (Schaumburg. IL) who has committed fraud and other crimes that resembles a Ponzi scheme. he has misused his power by illegally removing my Florida gift home out of my unregistered Trust name. He then  placed my gift  home in another trust to allegedly off-set the balance of that trust, Afterwards, he allegedly paid Circuit Court Judge, Moira Susan Johnson (Richard J. Daley Center, Chicago Il) a million plus dollars and several attorneys in question: divorce attorney Joel Degrazia ( Schaumburg Il), divorce attorney Jessica Oefelein ( Schaumburg Il), divorce attorney Elliot Heidelberger (Hanover Park and Chicago Il), divorce attorney Learetta Tyson ( South Chicago Il) thousands of dollars to botch the divorce case and cover up the crime.   

If a Judge does not fully comply with the Constitution, then his/her order are void, In re Sawyer, 124 U.S. 200 (1888), he/she is without jurisdiction, and he/she has engaged in an act or acts of treason.

If anyone has an estate planning or business dealing with Estate attorney Donald Sadowski of Schaumburg Il, whos connected with And Alliance Bernstein Global Investor Service Inc. I suggest you inspect and Investigate your Fund/Portfolio with this crook and get a second opinion.

Attorney Jessica Oefelein the opposing counsel, alleged that while residing with my husband, I allegedly took $10,000.00 from my shared residence, months later the opposing counsel decided to up the price from $10,000.00 to $16,000.00, she then aided and abetted  her client into perjury by now alleging that my Florida gift home which I located via the internet, purchased during our marriage is now his non-marital property, Judge Johnson aided this perjury and at the last minute the Judge combined the hearing and the trial together,  this corrupt  and bias Judge decided that I must pay for my own attorney after Judge Bellows ordered my husband to pay my attorney fees and maintenance, I was a house wife and husband was the sole provider, the corrupt Judge Johnson ordered that I walk away with nothing, she ordered that I make no claims toward my Florida gift home, she ordered that I pay my own credit card bills, she also placed my non-marital automobile on reserve Judge Johnson ordered that I must pay 10% of the $16000.00 or I will be in contempt of court, therefore a body warrant has been issued for my arrest while I was in the courtroom.

I have never missed a court appearance, Ive never obstruct justice, I jut set there dumb founded while my attorney Learetta Tyson screwed me over and made no objections. the body warrant was issued against me while I was in court and court was in session,  the session was not recorded, but is documented with the courts,  judge Johnson alleged that session was recorded, but there was no court reporter there on 2/8/2011. a clear  Judicial violation, and it enables me from filing criminal charges at this time until I can somehow pay this bogus  $1,600.00 contempt of court charge.

My attorney Learetta Tyson, who made little to no argument,  quit my case because of the alleged corruption,  she alleged that she is a civil rights attorney who helped bring down crooked lawyers and Judge, yet she allegedly took a bribe, she has since updated her website, now with video, unlike before.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L9HSR5EcuxI

After reporting Judge Susan Moira Johnson to the Judiciary review board, I was later told that she was answering to the charges, but no disciplinary action was taken. I later received a letter from the inquiry board stating that they have closed the case.

COMPLAINT AGAINST DEFENDANTS, ALLEGES AND AVERS AS FOLLOW;

1.  Leonard J. Jablon (hereafter, Respondent / defendant A )

2.  IL, Attorney Learetta Tyson  - 29534 - (hereafter, defendant B )

3.  IL, Attorney Jessica Oefelein ( Lagattuta, Degrazia & Oefelein  PC.) - 38490 - (hereinafter, defendant C)

4.  IL, Attorney Joel Degrazia ( Lagattuta, Degrazia & Oefelein PC.) - 38990 - (hereinafter, defendant D)

5.  IL, Attorney, Donald Sadowski (hereinafter, defendant E)

6.  IL, Attorney Elliot Heidelberger - 24499 - (hereinafter, defendant F)

7. IL, Circuit Court Judge Moira Susan Johnson - 1836 - (hereafter, defendant G)

CHARLOTTE COUNTY FORECLOSURE ABSOLUTE AUCTION SITE

A.  On or around February 1st 2009, while surfing the internet, plaintiff came across a real foreclosure site Called the Charlotte County real foreclosure absolute auction site.

 INSTRUCTIONS

B.  All properties are sold AS IS. You must register on the web site and you are required to place a deposit equal to 5% of your estimated successful final bid.
Either on the Charlotte.realforeclosed.com website via electronic check (ACH) or in person with cash or cashiers check or money order payable to: CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT.

$10,000.00 DEPOSIT

C.  On or around February  4th 2009, defendant A, gave the Clerk of the Circuit Court a 10,000.00 deposit. via electronic check (ACH). For plaintiff dream home.

THE  TITLE

D.  The name on the Title was (The Mahoghanys Crystal Trust)With Leonard Jablon as Trustee.

E.  The successful bidder MUST pay the balance of the final bid PLUS the registry of the court service charge no later than 11:00AM EM  (THE NEXT BUSINESS DAY).

HIGHEST BIDDER

F.  On 05/11/2009.  We ( plaintiff and defendant )were the successful highest bidder for the Florida bank foreclosed home In the amount of  $186,100

CHECKS

G.  On 05/11/2009 plaintiff and defendant A, hurried to his banks and withdrew the checks from defendant A, personal / business accounts.

CASH ADVANCE

H.  Defendant A, also withdrew  $25,000.00  from one of his credit cards and rushed to the FedEx center to overnight the money to the Charlotte County Courthouse (see attachments).

STOCKS

I.  On May. 11, 2009 defendant A,   asked his accountant, Mr. Roger Rowe, to sell three small stocks from the Judith Jablon Trust.

OFFICIAL

J.  On 05/12/2009 the home located at :  5242 Fleming St. Port Charlotte Florida was plaintiff official dream/vacation home, According to the Charlotte County clerk of the courts.

REIMBURSEMENT

K.  On May 13th 2009, defendant A,  received the money from the stocks and deposit the money into his personal accounts to REIMBURSE HIMSELF for the purchase of my Florida dream home.
   (see attachments)

ORPORATE CREDIT CARD

L.  On 05/19/2009, plaintiff, defendant A, and plaintiff mother, flew (airplane) to Port Charlotte Florida for seven days to see and work on cleaning up the Florida property, and purchased items for plaintiff  property, all of which was paid for with my husbands corporate credit card.

SIGNING AND BACKDATED PRENUPTIAL

I.  On or around June 1st through June 5th 2009 plaintiff spoke to defendant E, via the telephone regarding plaintiff coming to defendant Es office and signing a pre-nuptial a couple of months after the marriage of plaintiff and defendant A, and a post- nuptial, and defendant E will backdate the pre-nuptial and plaintiff spoke about creating a new and joint trust for plaintiff and defendant A.

NEW AND JOINT TRUST

II.  Defendant E, refused to create a new and joint trust for plaintiff and defendant A, alleging that defendant As deceased wife trust (Judith Jablon )  is suffiencient  for both plaintiff and defendant A.

SECOND OPINION

III.  On or around June 5th 2009, Plaintiff  wanted a second opinion on backdating a pre-nuptial, and on the Judith Jablon trust, plaintiff asked defendant E, if she could bring an attorney to his office for a second opinion, defendant E, strongly stated NO.  

 TRANSFER TITLE.

IV.  On or around, June 5th 2009, defendant E, then asked plaintiff, if she would transfer TITLE from plaintiffs gifted Florida home into the Judith Jablon trust to ensure that plaintiff and defendant A, stay married until death, plaintiff said yes, but only after plaintiff  gets a second opinion on the Judith Jablon trust, defendant E, strongly suggested NO second opinions.

SECOND OPINION

V.  What is so wrong with getting a second opinion on a legal Trust, what is so secretive about this Trust that would make defendant E, go nuts, has defendant E, stolen money from this Trust that he dont want defendant A, to know about.

COERCED

1.  Defendant E,  coerced defendant A, via the telephone with defendant A, speaker on,  to NOT allow plaintiff to get a second opinion regarding the Judith Jablon Trust and to persuade her to sign over her  Florida gift home or they, defendant A and E, will go to jail for the misuse of the Judith Jablon trust and defendants C and D will go to jail for the cover up.

MURDER THREAT.

2.  Plaintiff then refused to go to defendant Es office, after many failed attempts from defendant E to defendant A, to bring plaintiff to his office, defendant E, alleged that he will get  plaintiff at all cost including threats of murder, ( see Donald Sadowski, ARDC, complaint ) alleging that plaintiff  has crossed the line because plaintiff refused to be apart of his (defendant E)  fraudulent and illegal scheme to sign  fraudulent documents, so he could  backdate the pre-nuptial document and sign over title of the Florida home.

3.  This made plaintiff  very suspicious, plaintiff asked defendant A, if she could get a copy of the Judith Jablon trust to get a second opinion on the Judith  Jablon trust, defendant A, said sure, he went on to say that the Judith Jablon trust is a simple land trust just like defendant A, the only difference is, the Judith Jablon trust has more property in it then the Leonard Jablon trust, defendant A, then produced both trusts to plaintiff to copy and get a second opinion.

FAILED ATTEMPTS

4.  Plaintiff then refused to go to defendant Es office, after many failed attempts from defendant E to defendant A, to bring plaintiff to his office, defendant E, alleged that he will get  plaintiff at all cost including threats of murder, alleging that plaintiff  has crossed the line because plaintiff refused to be apart of his (defendant E)  fraudulent and illegal scheme to sign  fraudulent documents, so he could  backdate the pre-nuptial document and sign over title of the Florida home.

FRAUDULENT CONCEALMENT  (DIVORCE)

I.  On or around June 8th 2009, after all else failed, defendant E,  coerced ( defendant A) to secretly divorce plaintiff, for not complying with his fraudulent schemes and he (defendant E) will see to it that the other attorneys defendant C, and D will falsely charge plaintiff with abandonment , fraud, and other illegal tactics, including stealing the Judith Jablon wedding ring, the same ring that defendant A, married plaintiff with and defendant A, admitted this in his deposition on June 8th 2010.

BACKDATING DOCUMENTS

II.  On June 16th 2009, plaintiff got a second opinion from attorney Larry Mraz of

Roselle IL.

III.  On or around June 16th 2009, plaintiff  explained the conversation  between herself and attorney Sadowski to attorney Mraz, plaintiff asked attorney Mraz, if he would  create a duplicate Trust  like the Judith Jablon land Trust and defendant A, land trust,  attorney Mraz explained to plaintiff  that he  did not want to get involved with or affiliate himself  with any attorney who backdates documents, he explained that the two TRUSTS were not the same, he explained the difference between the two trusts,  he also explained that the Judith Jablon Trust was not a simple land Trust as Attorney Sadowski alleged, he explained that the Judith Jablon Trust was a marital and a residuary Trust  and had a million plus dollars in it, he then (attorney Mraz) referred me to attorney Elliot Heidelberger.

Plaintiff has accidentally uncovered a crime of stolen money from a deceased womans Trust allegedly committed by Attorney Donald Sadowski that resembles a Ponzi Scheme. (see attached.)

NEW LIVING WILL

IV.  On or around July 7th 2009, defendant A, went to attorney Sadowski office, then came back to the Northbrook home with a new Living Will, that was backdated to the year 2000. Defendant A, stated that the new Living Will didnt take long to create and backdate, plaintiff asked defendant A, if she could make a copy of it, defendant A, said yes and gave plaintiff the new living will to copy.

VICIOUSLY ATTACKED

V.  On June 21ST  2009, Fathers Day, plaintiff was in bed with defendant A, when defendant A, son Joseph bust through the bedroom door and viciously attacked plaintiff, alleging that a few days prior, he overheard defendant E, telling defendant A,  that they were going to tell the courts that plaintiff has stolen money from the Judith Trust and secretly purchased a Florida dream home for herself, plaintiff put a restraining order against defendant A, son Joseph, he was not allowed in the Northbrook residence. (see police report).

CREDIT CARD ADDITION

VI.  On June 30th 2009, defendant A, drove plaintiff to Costco Warehouse to add her on his Costco account, defendant A, submitted his identification card,  plaintiff  submitted her identification card with her maiden name (Hausley) appearing on her I.D.
Plaintiff was given an American Express card from Costco.

FRAUDULENT CONCEALMENT,  ILLEGAL AND DECEPTIVE PRACTICE

A.  On June 2009 through September 2009, (defendant E) engaged in fraud, and conversion, deceptive practices that  resembles a Ponzi Scheme  regarding the Judith Jablons Trust, backdating documents, civil theft of plaintiff Florida home, secretly and illegally causing defendant A to file for a divorce under fraudulent concealment, which led to irreparable damage to plaintiff and defendant As marriage.

BRIBERY, NEGLIGENCE


B.  On September 2nd 2009, plaintiff, was told by defendant A, that defendant F, took a bribe from him to botch this divorce case so that the Judge will rule in defendant A, favor regarding plaintiff  Florida home and the outcome of the divorce proceedings.

ATTORNEY WICKER

C.  On or around September 5th 2009, plaintiff contacted the Florida attorney John Wicker who originally set up plaintiffs land Trust and asked him to check with the Florida Courts and see if plaintiffs gift home was fraudulently and illegally taken from her trust by defendants A and E.

MOTION TO AMEND TITLE

D.  On September 8th 2009, attorney Wicker stated that there was a MOTION TO AMEND TITLE filed on
June 16th 2009, by defendant E, fraudulently Alleging  that defendant A, mistakenly put the Florida home in the Mahoganys Crystal Trust , fraudulently  alleging that it was a non-existent Trust.

INTERCEPT

E.  September 8th 2009, Attorney Wicker then asked if  plaintiff  wanted him to go to court and intercept the process. Plaintiff  stated to attorney Wicker that  she  did, and I (plaintiff) have a divorce attorney name attorney Elliot Heidelberger,  you (attorney Wicker) and he (Elliot Heidelberger) can discuss legal procedures on how to keep plaintiffs Florida home in plaintiffs Trust.

MOTION TO AMEND TITLE

F. On September 8th 2009, attorney Wicker emailed plaintiff the documents (MOTION TO AMEND TITLE)  plaintiff immediately forwarded the documents to attorney Heidelberger.

FRAUDULENT CONCEALMENT, BREACH OF CONTRACT, NEGLIGENCE;

G. On September 8th 2009, and up until his release,  defendant F, ignored all requests made by plaintiff , to him and through his paralegal, to speak with attorney Wicker regarding what documents to file from Illinois to Florida that would make the Florida Courts aware of  the fraud between defendant A, and defendant E,  and that plaintiffs Trust does exists because the signed trust was not registered with the courts yet, estate attorney Donald Sadowski had destroyed the signed trust.

COURT ORDER VIOLATION

H. In October 2009  Defendant A, has stopped paying the co-payment on  plaintiff medical bills, he has stopped the temporary maintenance, that was a direct order from the Courts, during the divorce proceedings, under the fraudulent advice of his attorneys, defendant C, and defendant D, has filed frivolous orders to the courts, aiding and abetting defendant A,  into perjury alleging fraud  by plaintiff to defendant A. ( defamation of character).

 1.                                      Citizens for Legal Responsibility
                      Some Illinois Attorney Disciplinary Orders

                LAGATTUTA & DeGRAZIA, P.C.

2.  People of the State of Illinois v. Eddie Williams

FAILURE TO REPORT FRAUD AND CONVERSION TO THE PROPER AUTHORITY, FRAUDULENT AND ILLEGAL CONCEALMENT, NEGLIGENCE AND BREACH OF CONTRACT

I.   In June 2009, and up until his release,  after reviewing plaintiff  documents/proof,  defendant F, did not report the fraudulent and the illegal activities that was committed by defendants  A , C, D and E  to the Proper Authorities, including but not limited to  the misuse of the Judith Jablon Trust, and the fraudulent documents produced by defendants A and E, to the Florida Court, and the Cook County Courts, regarding the Mahoganys Crystal Trust and this fraudulent and illegal  concealment allowed defendants A, C, D, and E, to illegally and fraudulently defraud the Florida and the Cook County Court.

FRAUD AND CONVERSION, CIVIL THEFT, UNJUST ENRICHMENT

J. On or around October 2009, Defendant E, fraudulently  alleged to the Florida Court that the Mahoganys Crystal Trust does not exists and fraudulently alleged to have placed an undivided 54.72% interest in the Leonard J. Jablon Trust  ( defendant A )  and fraudulently alleged to have placed an undivided 45.28% interest in the Judith Jablons Trust, ( defendant  As  deceased wife )  defendant F, known or should have known that the Florida property was a gift in Trust to plaintiff,  purchased during plaintiffs and defendant As, marriage and by defendant F, not reporting this to the Proper Authorities, he concealed and allowed this illegal and fraudulent activity to happen , defendant E and defendant A, directed a conspiracy and scheme in which they filed and caused to be filed fraudulent and illegal documents to the Florida  and the Cook County Court, (a violation of the court order).

FLORIDA ATTORNEY

K.  On September 13th 2009 plaintiff spoke to attorney John Wicker, via the internet regarding computer hacking by defendant A, and he suggest that plaintiff  purchase a spy ware program call eblaster for protecting plaintiffs privacy  from her husband, while on the computer.

CONSPIRACY TO DEFRAUD, CIVIL THEFT, UNJUST ENRICHMENT

L.  On or around October 2009, defendants A, C, D, E, AND F, conspired and caused to conspire documents that was fraudulently filed and used to obtain the Florida gift home from the Florida Court to take the home out from plaintiff trust and placed into defendant A, wife trust, and used said fraudulent documents to  illegally file,  conceal, then  defrauded the Cook County Court.

www.judicialview.com/State.../Snyder-v-Elliot-Heidelberger/44/3268.

CONSULTATION

M.  On November 30th 2009, plaintiff had an appointment for a consultation with defendant B, plaintiff wanted a second (2nd) opinion regarding plaintiffs  Florida home, and the legalities of defendant F, allowing  defendant A and defendant E, to fraudulently  and illegally remove plaintiff Florida home from plaintiff  trust, which was a gift in Trust, and why defendant F, did not report the fraud to the  Proper Authority, plaintiff gave (defendant B) all court documents that was in her possession regarding plaintiff Florida home, and  the documents pertaining to the divorce with respondent

DECEPTIVE PRACTICE

N. On November 30th 2009,  defendant B, stated to plaintiff that she can clearly see that defendant F, was fraudulently and illegally screwing plaintiff over and that plaintiff should file a complaint against him with the ARDC, plaintiff asked who are they and what could they do for plaintiff.

ARDC

O. On November 30th 2009,  defendant B, stated that they are the Attorney registration and disciplinary commission.

P.  On November 30th 2009, defendant B, alleged that once the ARCD reads plaintiffs complaint and if attorney Heidelberger (defendant F) have money in his account that the ARDC will make him pay you (plaintiff) for your Florida home.

Q, plaintiff asked defendant B, if she would take my case, defendant B, stated that she would, but first plaintiff has to fire defendant F.

NEW ATTORNEY

R.  On November 30th 2009, Defendant B, quoted plaintiff her retainer fee 0f  $3,475.00  and said she defendant B will take the case but plaintiff first has to fire defendant F.

FIRED THROUGH EMAIL

S.  On December 1st 2009 plaintiff emailed attorney Heidelberger (defendant F) and fired him.

RETAINER

I.  On or around December 2009, plaintiff borrowed money from her good friend, to retain defendant B.

On  December 15th 2009, a motion of Elliot Heidelberger to withdraw as attorney for the petitioner.

SET FOR STATUS

January 15th 2009,  the matter for Elliot Heidelberger to withdraw was set for status.

ATTORNEY CLIENT AGREEMENT

II. On January 27th 2010  plaintiff, signed an Attorney Client Agreement with defendant B, and paid a retainer in the sum of $3,475.00.

NEW YORK

III.  On February 2010, plaintiff went to New York, to get away from the corrupt divorce proceeding that were taken place, while there plaintiff,  sold some of her old Jewelry that she purchased many years prior to meeting defendant A,  that was stored at her Schaumburg apartment, because defendant A, violated  the Judges order for maintenance, and he should have been held in contempt of court.

PROPER AUTHORITIES

IV.  In February 2010, , and up until her release, after reviewing plaintiff  documents/proof,  defendant B, did not report the fraud, the conversion and the illegal activities that was committed by defendants A, C, D and E, to the Proper Authorities, including but not limited to the misuse of the Judith Jablon Trust, and the fraudulent documents produced by defendants A and E, to the Florida Court, regarding the Mahoganys Crystal Trust and this fraudulent and illegal  concealment allowed defendants A, C, D and E, to illegally and fraudulently defraud the Florida and the Cook County Court, a violation of the court order.

ILLEGAL EVIDENCE

V.  On March 1st 2010 defendant B, called plaintiff and informed her that she had talked to defendant C, and was informed that  defendant A,  has fraudulently hacked into plaintiffs computer and they have copies of all of plaintiffs and defendant A, nude pictures that was taken from plaintiffs digital camera and downloaded onto plaintiffs personal computer, and defendant C, plans to use the fraudulent and illegal evidence against you ( plaintiff) in Court.

DEPOSITION

VI.   On June 8TH  2010, in defendant A, deposition, defendant A, stated that he married plaintiff  with the Judith Jablon wedding ring.

TRANSFER JUDGES

I.  On July 19th  2010, (defendant D) file a motion to transfer Judge, from Judge Bellows Courtroom 1602,   to  Judge Johnsons Courtroom 1903.

DECEPTIVE PRACTICE

II.  On September 1st 2010, plaintiff asked defendant B, why did opposing counsel change judge, (defendant B) deceptively alleged that she changed Judge, without plaintiffs approval/knowledge.

BREACH OF CONTRACT, NEGLIGENCE

III.  On   or around September 1st 2010, plaintiff  over heard defendant B, discussing a conversation that was between plaintiff and plaintiffs friend Ronald Friedman, to the opposing counsel, defendant C, telling defendant C that  plaintiff, plaintiffs daughter and plaintiff friend had lunch together, defendant C, later that day used an innocent lunch against plaintiff  and plaintiffs friend during questioning, alleging that plaintiff and her friend are lovers.

BRIBERY

IV.  September 2010, defendant A,  continually revealed to plaintiff that he is illegally paying defendant B to botch the divorce case to go in his favor.

BRIBERY, BREACH OF CONTRACT, NEGLIGENCE

V. On September 1st 2010,  Defendant B, alleged that she must withdraw as plaintiff attorney, after several attempts by plaintiff, defendant B, never answered yes or no to the bribery allegations that she did not take a bribe from defendants  A, C,D,E, and F, but defendant B, insinuated that defendant G, (Judge Susan Moira Johnson did.)

PRE-TRIAL,  DECEPTIVE PRACTICE AND BREACH OF CONTRACT, NEGLIGENCE.

A.  On September 1st 2010, (defendant B) never informed plaintiff that this was the day for pre-trial, never prepared plaintiff for the pre-trial hearing,  defendant B never discussed questions that would be asked during the pre-trial hearing, there was never a trial.

DEPRIVATION, NEGLIGENCE, OBSTRUCTING JUSTICE

B.  On September 1st 2010 defendant B,  and defendant G, deceptively deprived plaintiff of her right to allow plaintiffs witness to testify on plaintiffs behalf, claiming that it was too late for witness to testify.

PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE

C.  On September 1st 2010 defendant B, fraudulently alleged in her billing statement that there was a pre-trial conference; entered into settlement negotiations - parties did not settle hearing scheduled for September 8th 2010.

PRE-TRILA NEGOTIATIONS

D.  On September 1st 2010, plaintiff, did not attend a pre-trial conference, alleged by (defendant B), plaintiff was unaware of a pre-trial conference, plaintiff was unaware of any negotiations.


PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE
E.  On September 8th 2010, there was never a pretrial conference,
Plaintiff was never aware of a  PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE, OR A TRIAL ever taken place during this divorce that was alleged by (defendant B).

PLAINTIFFS TESTIMONY NOT RECORDED

F.  In September 2010 while plaintiff  was being questioned under oath ,defendant B, deliberately asked the type of questions that allowed defendant C, to object , so plaintiffs testimony would not be recorded.

ATTORNEY FEES

G.  In September  2010, defendant B, written a bogus fee petition for respondent to pay attorney fees, defendant G asked that she re-write it.

NEGLIGENCE, SPOILATION   (OF EVIDENCE )

I.  On or around September 30th 2010, defendant B, did not present plaintiffs proof/ documents into evidence, alleging that defendant G ordered her not to submit..  Depriving plaintiff of the right to present evidence further disabling plaintiff with emotional stress.

OBSTRUCTING JUSTICE, NEGLIGENCE,  DEPRIVATION

II.  On or around September, 30th 2010, again, defendants B, and G, deceptively deprived plaintiff of the right to allow plaintiffs witnesses to testify on plaintiffs behalf.

FRAUD AND CONVERSION ON  FORECLOSED DOCUMENTS, UNJUST ENRICHMENT

III.  On November 22nd 2010 Plaintiff  testified that defendant A, and defendant C and D,  committed fraud and conversion  by conspiring to file documents with the Illinois Circuit Court, alleging that defendant As helicopter company was bank foreclosed, when instead defendant A  and defendant C and D, transferred defendant A, helicopter business out of his name and into the name of defendant As friends company name (Dan Asher).    (see attachments).

DEPOITION TRANSCRIPT

IV.  On November 30th 2010, plaintiff, requested a copy of defendant A, deposition transcript, defendant B, deceptively alleges that plaintiff fee for a copy would cost $2, 250. 00   plus  $178. 00. (I have the email).

CHANGE OF COURT DATE

V.  On January 25th 2011, plaintiff  went to court, on her scheduled court date in courtroom 1903, plaintiff was told by Judge Johnsons clerk that Judge Johnson was presiding in court room 1602, plaintiff went to court room 1602, then was told by defendant G (judge Johnson ) and not told by defendant B that plaintiff court date was changed to February 8th 2011.

CHANDE OF COURT DATE

VI.  Defendant B, never informed  plaintiff  that the January 25th 2011, court date was changed to February 8th 2011.

CHANGE JUDGES

VII.  February 2011 plaintiff discovered that (defendant D) filed the motioned to change Judge, and not defendant B as she alleged.

FRAUDULENT CONCEALMENT, ILLEGAL AND DECEPTIVE PRACTICE, CONSPIRACY AND NEGLIGENCE

VIII.   On February 8th 2011, (defendant B), re-wrote her fee petition after conspiring with defendant C and defendant G, to defraud the Cook County Court, and filing illegal and fraudulent documents, then defendant G, tried to Purged the documents. (fee petition for defendant A, to pay denied).

NO COURT REPORTER

A.  On February 8th 2011, There was NO Court reporter during session, session was not recorded.


DECEPTIVE  PRACTICE,  FRAUDULENT CONCEALMENT

B.   On February 8th 2011, defendant B, did not make any arguments on behalf of  plaintiff ,  for  the return of plaintiffs Florida home, located at: 5242 Fleming St, Port Charlotte Fl. 33981, which was a gift in Trust.

DUE PROCESS

C.  Plaintiff was not  given a fair hearing in a State Court proceeding, deprivation of property without due process.

2001 NISSAN ALTIMA

D.  On February 8th 2011, a frivolous order was issued by defendant C, and granted by defendant G, for plaintiffs 2001 Nissan Altima to be reserved, a vehicle that was purchased/ paid in full during plaintiffs first marriage in 2005. (non-marital property),  also the same vehicle in which Judge Bellows  in October, 2009, ordered that defendant A, cannot take because that was plaintiffs vehicle before the marriage.

The Court in Yates v. Village of Hoffman Estates, Illinois, 209 F. Supp. 757 (N.D. ILL. 1962) held that not every action by a Judge is in exercise of his Judicial function. it is not a judicial function for a Judge to commit a intentional tort even though the tort occurs in the courthouse. When a judge acts as a trespasser of the law, when a judge does not follow the law, the judge loses subject-matter jurisdiction and the judges orders are void, of no legal force or effect.

LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCY

E.  On February 8th 2011, defendant B, and defendant G, allowed defendant C, to file a fraudulent motion for law enforcement agency to comply, while plaintiff was in the courtroom, without regards to habeas corpus.

STAY OF EXERCUTION

F On February 8th 2011, defendant B and defendant G, allowed defendant C, to fraudulently and illegally filed through the Circuit Court of Cook County, while plaintiff was in the courtroom, a stay of Execution (allowed).

ATTORNEY FEES

G.  On February 8th 2011, defendant B, filed her petition for attorney fees to be paid by defendant A, which somehow was denied, petition for attorney fees to be paid by plaintiff, was somehow allowed the sum of over $19,000.00 defendant A, B and defendant C and G, was aware that plaintiff is indigent.

FINANCIAL STATEMENT, FRAUDULENT CONCEALMENT

H.  On or before February 8th 2011, defendant B, didnt submit plaintiffs, January 2011, financial disclosure statement to the Court, alleging that defendant G ordered her not to.

PARTY TO PURGE

I.  On February 8th 2011,  defendant C,  motioned for PARTY TO PURGE  (allowed by defendant G).

WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY, BREACH OF CONTRACT, NEGLIGENCE

1. On or around March 4th 2011, defendant B,  filed a motion, substitution  and/ or withdrawal of attorney from the petitioners case, after many months of threatening to remove herself from plaintiffs case, after plaintiff questioned defendant B, regarding a bribe that defendant A, alleges she took, defendant B, alleged that there is a bribe on the table, but she defendant  B, didnt take the bribe, but insinuated that a higher Authority did (defendant G).

Any judge or attorney who does not report a judge for treason as required by law may themselves be guilty of misprison of treason, 18 U.S.C. Section 2382.

REAONABLE DEGREE OF CARE OR SKILL IN REPRESENTING HER CLIENT

2.  On March 2010, through March 2011, defendant B, failed to exercise a reasonable degree of care or skill in representing her client,.

FRAUDULENT CONCEALMENT, DECEPTIVE PRACTICE , NEGLIGENCE AND BREACH OF CONTRACT.

3.  On or around March 9th 2011, defendant F, mailed plaintiff, a bill, fraudulently alleging that plaintiff owe him several thousand dollars For his services which the court ordered defendant A, to pay, and defendant A, paid plaintiffs attorney fees to defendant F.  (see attachment).

NEW ATTORNEY.

4.  On March 10th 2011, plaintiffs family hired an attorney by the name of Michael Moore, who was present on the next court date which was March 22nd 2011.

NEW ATTORNEY, MICHAEL MOORE

5.  On March 22nd 2011, plaintiffs new attorney Michael Moore, appeared before the court, to file his appearance and to address the fraudulent and illegal  contempt of Court, and default  charge that was illegally placed on plaintiff,  attorney, Mr. Michael Moore was given twenty one days to file his written appearance.

FAILED TO FILE AN APPEARANCE

6.  March 22nd 2011, defendant C,  entered another fraudulent default order against the Petitioner/Counter-Respondent, (fraudulently) alleging  that Petitioner/Counter-Respondent failed to file an appearance and answer for March 22nd 2011.

FRAUD, CONSPIRACY , NEGLIGENCE, DECEPTIVE PRACTICE , SCHEME , CIVIL THEFT AND UNJUST ENRICHMENT

7.  On April 4th  2011, defendant C and G  directed a conspiracy and scheme, in which they fraudulently filed and caused to file  fraudulent and illegal documents ( Judgment for dissolution of marriage) through the Cook County Court that Plaintiff/Counter-Respondent was in default,  and that Plaintiff/Counter-petitioner was personally served an order of default papers on February 9th 2011.

Judges have given themselves judicial immunity for their judicial functions. Judges have no judicial immunity for criminal acts, aiding, assisting, or conniving with others who perform a criminal act, or for their administrative/ministerial duties. When a judge has a duty to act, he does not have discretion - he is then not performing a judicial act, he is performing a ministerial act.

8.  Plaintiffs divorce case has been Severely Compromised and therefore Corrupted.

FRAUD AND CONVERSION, DECEPTIVE PRACTICE,  NEGLIGENCE, CONSPIRACY,SCHEME, UNJUST ENRICHMENT

9.  On April 4th  2011, defendants , C and G, directed a conspiracy and scheme, in which she filed and caused to file this frivolous document  ( Judgment  for dissolution of marriage) through the Cook County Court that petitioners Florida home, which is a gift in Trust, and bought during plaintiff and defendant As marriage, has been illegally and fraudulently Turned into defendant As,  non-marital property and percentages were placed into defendant A,  and defendant As deceased wife (Judith Jablon) Trust.

Any Judge who does not comply with his/her Oath to the Constitution of the United States wars against that Constitution and engages in acts in violation of the Supreme Law of the Land. The Judge is engaged in acts of treason. Having taken at least two, if not three, oaths of office to support the Constitution of the United States, and the Constitution of the State of Illinois, any Judge who has acted in violation of the Constitution is engaged in an act or acts of treason.

SWORN OATHS

10.  All defendants ( attorneys and the Judge)  in question, has taken  SWORN OATHS OF OFFICE to uphold the law, yet they have broken an abundance of laws in THIS case, all defendants should be Audited, Disbarred, and Sanctioned.

Any judge or attorney who does not report a judge for treason as required by law may themselves be guilty of misprison of treason, 18 U.S.C. Section 2382.

NO CONTACT RULE    

A. On April 4th 2011,  by defendant C, own admission, on page 2 of said hearing, misrepresented the Courts by fraudulently alleged that she (defendant C ) as a courtesy, sent a copy and notice of todays hearing and the order of default to attorney Michael Moore and Mrs. Jablon, (plaintiff)  (see attached).

NO  CONTACT   RULE.     

B.  Mrs. Jablon,  (plaintiff)  had an attorney, by the name of Michael Moore, there would have been NO need to send a copy and notice to plaintiff.

HEARING FOR DEFAULT

C.  Plaintiff or her attorney Mr. Michael Moore, has NEVER received a Copy of the hearing for default prove-up set forth on April 4th 2011 and the Divorce was granted on that date.

D.  Defendant A, was a great husband, and plaintiff has never used her ex-boyfriend or her ex-husband as a comparison to defendant A.

PERJURY, AND MISSUSE OF THE JUDITH JABLON TRUST

E.  On April 4th 2011, Page 7, of said hearing, if  defendant A, has suffered stress or anxiety, and loss of sleep, its because of the fraudulent  concealment and illegal practice that has taken place and the misuse of the Judith Jablon Trust, the perjury committed and defendant A, is in fear of being audited and sanctioned as a proximate result.

PERJURY, NEGLIGENCE AND FRAUD AND CONVERSION

F.  On April 4th 2011, Page 8, question and answer  6, through 11, of said hearing on April 4th 2011, defendant C, known or should have known that she made frivolous statements and  directed her client (defendant A,)  to answer loaded  and leading questions, aiding and abetting  defendant A, and defendant C into Perjury.  


BUSINES OWNER

G. On April 4th 2011,  Page 11, of said hearing on April 4th 2011, defendant C, known and or should have known that defendant A, owns a helicopter business, buys and sells helicopters each and every year, he buys and sell stocks and bonds, he also owns a furniture store aside from receiving  half of his deceased wife Social Security and his full Social Security benefits, is a helicopter pilot, and owns a fleet of helicopters, with two or more employees, and that defendant A, specializes in group tours, helicopter charter, and rides.

INDIGENT

H.  On April 4th 2011, Page 12, defendant C, known and should have known that plaintiff is not able to support herself, fully without the support from defendant A.

FRAUD, DECEPTIVE PRACTICE, NEGLIGENCE,   AND PERJURY

I. On April 4th 2011, Page 12, of said hearing, defendant C,  known and should have known that she aided and abetted her client into perjury by fraudulently alleging that the Florida property,  which was a gift in Trust to plaintiff, during the marriage, that was discussed during defendant A, and plaintiff deposition, and pre-trial, has now been fraudulently and illegally,  placed into the Judith Jablon Trust, and the Leonard Jablon Trust.

WORLD POINT CREDIT CARD

J.  Plaintiff, was not issued a world point visa credit card, after separating from defendant A.

FRAUDULENT CONCEALMENT

K.  Plaintiff, has never missed a court appearance during this divorce, but somehow defendant C and defendant G, set up an April 4th 2011 court date without the knowledge of  plaintiff  or her  attorney Mr. Michael Moore.

REAL PROPERTY

L.  April 4th 2011, page 8, of said hearing, numbers 6 through  11, defendant C, in open Court,  and under oath, question defendant A,  and assisted him into  perjury, fraud and conversion by alleging that defendant A, did not acquire any real property and defendant A, and plaintiff never acquired property together.

EMANCIPATED

M.  On April 4th 2011, page 10, of said hearing, number 2, defendant C, known or should have known, that she assisted her client ( defendant A) into perjury, by  fraudulently alleging that his sons are emancipated.

PERJURY, DECEPTIVE PRACTICE, NEGLIGENCE, AND FRAUD

N.  On April 4th 2011, page 10 of said hearing, in open court, under oath, defendant C, known or should have known, that she assisted her client, (defendant A,) into  perjury by assisting him in his fraudulent answers  to  number 5 through 15.

PERJURY , FRAUD AND CONVERSION

O.  When an attorney willfully and intentionally assist his/her client into PERJURY,  FRAUD  AND CONVERSION in open court, under oath, that attorney is as guilty of perjury,  fraud and conversion  as his/her client, and should be disbarred and sanctioned.

Q.  On July 11th 2011, Kathleen Bono quoted a price of  $450. 00 plus another $178. 50  for her service and fee, she ( Kathleen Bono) alleged that she repeatedly attempted to contact defendant B, via telephone, email, and fax for payment of $ 178. 50 for her service and fee for June 8th 2010  deposition, and if I (plaintiff) wants a copy of defendant A, deposition then plaintiff would have to pay $450. 00  plus $178. 50 for her service and fee, that defendant B, neglected to pay.

CONTRACT

T.  All Defendants, failed to comply with a contract and or their sworn oath of  duty not to violate Constitutional rights, and a marriage contract, all defendants, known and should have known that they  participated in wrongdoing by covering up fraud, discrimination and conversion, participated in fraud and conversion, malfeasance, civil theft, negligence, dereliction, malpractice, perversion,  injustice, infliction, evildoing, dishonesty, unjust enrichment , professional misconduct, defamation of character, breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty, illegal and deceptive practices,  bribery, and not one of them  reported the fraud , conversion , malpractice,  deception etc. to the proper authorities and plaintiff has suffered unnecessary Severe emotional distress, as a direct and proximate result of all the defendants fraudulent, illegal, and deceptive practices/ schemes, AND THEY SHOULD BE SANCTIONED.

Plaintiff has contact the ILARDC,  regarding the attorneys in question, they refuse to investigate, they went as far as to say in their letter to me quote that there is no attorney registered to practice law in Illinois with the name Learetta Tyson or a similar name, end quote yet Attorney Learetta Tyson has been practicing in Illinois for twenty years or more.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L9HSR5EcuxI

IN RE J.H., A MINOR
(THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, PETITIONER-APPELLEE,
v.
RUTH H., RESPONDENT, (ALMA LEARETTA TYSON, COUNSEL FOR MOTHER-RESPONDENT, APPELLANT)).

Plaintiff has exhausted all finances.

This divorce case has been severely compromised, contaminated and therefore corrupted, I would like my divorce re- tried.
All defendants has ruin my life

My husband and I are very cordial with each other, I am not paranoid, my allegations are the Truth and nothing but.

My divorce was illegally obtained, therefore, I dont know if  Im still married or am I illegally divorced.

The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals held that the Circuit Court of Cook County is a criminal enterprise. U.S. v. Murphy, 768 F.2d 1518, 1531 (7th Cir. 1985).
The United States Supreme Court recently acknowledged the judicial corruption in Cook County, when it stated that Judge "Maloney was one of many dishonest judges exposed and convicted through 'Operation Greylord', a labyrinthine federal investigation of judicial corruption in Chicago". Bracey v. Gramley, case No. 96-6133 (June 9, 1997).

I have an abundance amount of Proof/Documents, everything but the payoff, I just have my husbands word.

I am seeking a contingency lawyer to file a lawsuit.

I have sent my complaint to every government official that I can think of and to this no avail.

I am seeking to file my complaint in Cook County Circuit Court, ASAP.

 The Cook County States Attorney office (Anita Alverez) alleges that you must first file a police report before they can file charges, but this crooked Judge Moira Susan Johnson blocked me from filing a police report by placing this Bogus body warrant on me for contempt of court in order to cover-up her crimes.


Thank you

Pat

 CORRUPTION, BRIBERY, FRAUD, LEGAL MALPRACTICE,  POSSIBLE PONZI SCHEME.
                                                                      
This is about a civil case/  complaint:           
                                                                             STATEMENT OF CASE:
       To whom it may concern!

Brought by (Pat )that names a Judge, five attorneys and other as defendants;

That alleges has numerous statutory causes of action against each defendant, such as fraud,  human, civil, and constitutional rights violations, corruption, bribery, million dollar +  payoffs.

I bring this suit pursuant to Title 42 U.S. Code 1983 for violations of certain protections guaranteed to me by the Fifth and fourteenth Amendments of the State Constitution by the defendants under color of law in their Capacity in the Courts of Cook County.

This letter is a complaint about my Illinois divorce, case #  09D8322, a multi-millionaire husband,  a crooked Judge and attorneys, whom my husband alleges that he paid a million plus dollars to Judge Moira Susan Johnson, and hundreds of thousand dollars to the attorneys in question to botch the case.

In Crook County Illinois, (cook county) there's an Estate Attorney name Donald Sadowski (Schaumburg. IL) who has committed fraud and other crimes that resembles a Ponzi scheme. he has misused his power by illegally removing my Florida gift home out of my unregistered Trust name. He then  placed my gift  home in another trust to allegedly off-set the balance of that trust, Afterwards, he allegedly paid Circuit Court Judge, Moira Susan Johnson (Richard J. Daley Center, Chicago Il) a million plus dollars and several attorneys in question: divorce attorney Joel Degrazia ( Schaumburg Il), divorce attorney Jessica Oefelein ( Schaumburg Il), divorce attorney Elliot Heidelberger (Hanover Park and Chicago Il), divorce attorney Learetta Tyson ( South Chicago Il) thousands of dollars to botch the divorce case and cover up the crime.   

When a judge acts as a trespasser of the law, when a judge does not follow the law, the judge loses subject-matter jurisdiction and the judges orders are void, of no legal force or effect.

If anyone has an estate planning or business dealing with Estate attorney Donald Sadowski of Schaumburg Il, whos connected with And Alliance Bernstein Global Investor Service Inc.

I suggest you inspect and Investigate your Fund/Portfolio with this crook and get a second opinion.

Attorney Jessica Oefelein the opposing counsel, alleged that while residing with my husband, I allegedly took $10,000.00 from my shared residence, months later the opposing counsel decided to up the price from $10,000.00 to $16,000.00, she then aided and abetted  her client into perjury by now alleging that my Florida gift home which I located via the internet, purchased during our marriage is now his non-marital property, Judge Johnson aided this perjury and at the last minute the Judge combined the hearing and the trial together,  this corrupt  and bias Judge decided that I must pay for my own attorney after Judge Bellows ordered my husband to pay my attorney fees and maintenance, I was a house wife and husband was the sole provider, the corrupt Judge Johnson ordered that I walk away with nothing, she ordered that I make no claims toward my Florida gift home, she ordered that I pay my own credit card bills, she also placed my non-marital automobile on reserve Judge Johnson ordered that I must pay 10% of the $16000.00 or I will be in contempt of court, therefore a body warrant has been issued for my arrest while I was in the courtroom.

I have never missed a court appearance, Ive never obstruct justice, I jut set there dumb founded while my attorney Learetta Tyson screwed me over and made no objections.
the body warrant was issued against me while I was in court and court was in session,  the session was not recorded, but is documented with the courts,  judge Johnson alleged that session was recorded, but there was no court reporter there on 2/8/2011. a clear  Judicial violation, and it enables me from filing criminal charges at this time until I can somehow pay this bogus  $1,600.00 contempt of court charge.

My attorney Learetta Tyson, who made little to no argument,  quit my case because of the alleged corruption,  she alleged that she is a civil rights attorney who helped bring down crooked lawyers and Judge, yet she allegedly took a bribe, she has since updated her website, now with video, unlike before.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L9HSR5EcuxI


After reporting Judge Susan Moira Johnson to the Judiciary review board, I was later told that she was answering to the charges, but no disciplinary action was taken. I later received a letter from the inquiry board stating that they have closed the case.

COMPLAINT AGAINST DEFENDANTS, ALLEGES AND AVERS AS FOLLOW;

1.  Leonard J. Jablon (hereafter, Respondent / defendant A )

2.  IL, Attorney Learetta Tyson  - 29534 - (hereafter, defendant B )

3.  IL, Attorney Jessica Oefelein ( Lagattuta, Degrazia & Oefelein  PC.) - 38490 - (hereinafter, defendant C)

4.  IL, Attorney Joel Degrazia ( Lagattuta, Degrazia & Oefelein PC.) - 38990 - (hereinafter, defendant D)

5.  IL, Attorney, Donald Sadowski (hereinafter, defendant E)

6.  IL, Attorney Elliot Heidelberger - 24499 - (hereinafter, defendant F)

7. IL, Circuit Court Judge Moira Susan Johnson - 1836 - (hereafter, defendant G)

CHARLOTTE COUNTY FORECLOSURE ABSOLUTE AUCTION SITE

A.  On or around February 1st 2009, while surfing the internet, plaintiff came across a real foreclosure site Called the Charlotte County real foreclosure absolute auction site.

 INSTRUCTIONS

B.  All properties are sold AS IS. You must register on the web site and you are required to place a deposit equal to 5% of your estimated successful final bid.
Either on the Charlotte.realforeclosed.com website via electronic check (ACH) or in person with cash or cashiers check or money order payable to: CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT.

$10,000.00 DEPOSIT

C.  On or around February  4th 2009, defendant A, gave the Clerk of the Circuit Court a 10,000.00 deposit. via electronic check (ACH). For plaintiff dream home.

THE  TITLE

D.  The name on the Title was (The Mahoghanys Crystal Trust)With Leonard Jablon as Trustee.

E.  The successful bidder MUST pay the balance of the final bid PLUS the registry of the court service charge no later than 11:00AM EM  (THE NEXT BUSINESS DAY).

HIGHEST BIDDER

F.  On 05/11/2009.  We ( plaintiff and defendant )were the successful highest bidder for the Florida bank foreclosed home In the amount of  $186,100

CHECKS

G.  On 05/11/2009 plaintiff and defendant A, hurried to his banks and withdrew the checks from defendant A, personal / business accounts.

CASH ADVANCE

H.  Defendant A, also withdrew  $25,000.00  from one of his credit cards and rushed to the FedEx center to overnight the money to the Charlotte County Courthouse (see attachments).

STOCKS

I.  On May. 11, 2009 defendant A,   asked his accountant, Mr. Roger Rowe, to sell three small stocks from the Judith Jablon Trust.

OFFICIAL

J.  On 05/12/2009 the home located at :  5242 Fleming St. Port Charlotte Florida was plaintiff official dream/vacation home, According to the Charlotte County clerk of the courts.

REIMBURSEMENT

K.  On May 13th 2009, defendant A,  received the money from the stocks and deposit the money into his personal accounts to REIMBURSE HIMSELF for the purchase of my Florida dream home.
   (see attachments)

ORPORATE CREDIT CARD

L.  On 05/19/2009, plaintiff, defendant A, and plaintiff mother, flew (airplane) to Port Charlotte Florida for seven days to see and work on cleaning up the Florida property, and purchased items for plaintiff  property, all of which was paid for with my husbands corporate credit card.

SIGNING AND BACKDATED PRENUPTIAL

I.  On or around June 1st through June 5th 2009 plaintiff spoke to defendant E, via the telephone regarding plaintiff coming to defendant Es office and signing a pre-nuptial a couple of months after the marriage of plaintiff and defendant A, and a post- nuptial, and defendant E will backdate the pre-nuptial and plaintiff spoke about creating a new and joint trust for plaintiff and defendant A.

NEW AND JOINT TRUST

II.  Defendant E, refused to create a new and joint trust for plaintiff and defendant A, alleging that defendant As deceased wife trust (Judith Jablon )  is suffiencient  for both plaintiff and defendant A.

SECOND OPINION

III.  On or around June 5th 2009, Plaintiff  wanted a second opinion on backdating a pre-nuptial, and on the Judith Jablon trust, plaintiff asked defendant E, if she could bring an attorney to his office for a second opinion, defendant E, strongly stated NO.  

 TRANSFER TITLE.

IV.  On or around, June 5th 2009, defendant E, then asked plaintiff, if she would transfer TITLE from plaintiffs gifted Florida home into the Judith Jablon trust to ensure that plaintiff and defendant A, stay married until death, plaintiff said yes, but only after plaintiff  gets a second opinion on the Judith Jablon trust, defendant E, strongly suggested NO second opinions.

SECOND OPINION

V.  What is so wrong with getting a second opinion on a legal Trust, what is so secretive about this Trust that would make defendant E, go nuts, has defendant E, stolen money from this Trust that he dont want defendant A, to know about.

COERCED

1.  Defendant E,  coerced defendant A, via the telephone with defendant A, speaker on,  to NOT allow plaintiff to get a second opinion regarding the Judith Jablon Trust and to persuade her to sign over her  Florida gift home or they, defendant A and E, will go to jail for the misuse of the Judith Jablon trust and defendants C and D will go to jail for the cover up.

MURDER THREAT.

2.  Plaintiff then refused to go to defendant Es office, after many failed attempts from defendant E to defendant A, to bring plaintiff to his office, defendant E, alleged that he will get  plaintiff at all cost including threats of murder, ( see Donald Sadowski, ARDC, complaint ) alleging that plaintiff  has crossed the line because plaintiff refused to be apart of his (defendant E)  fraudulent and illegal scheme to sign  fraudulent documents, so he could  backdate the pre-nuptial document and sign over title of the Florida home.

3.  This made plaintiff  very suspicious, plaintiff asked defendant A, if she could get a copy of the Judith Jablon trust to get a second opinion on the Judith  Jablon trust, defendant A, said sure, he went on to say that the Judith Jablon trust is a simple land trust just like defendant A, the only difference is, the Judith Jablon trust has more property in it then the Leonard Jablon trust, defendant A, then produced both trusts to plaintiff to copy and get a second opinion.

FAILED ATTEMPTS

4.  Plaintiff then refused to go to defendant Es office, after many failed attempts from defendant E to defendant A, to bring plaintiff to his office, defendant E, alleged that he will get  plaintiff at all cost including threats of murder, alleging that plaintiff  has crossed the line because plaintiff refused to be apart of his (defendant E)  fraudulent and illegal scheme to sign  fraudulent documents, so he could  backdate the pre-nuptial document and sign over title of the Florida home.

FRAUDULENT CONCEALMENT  (DIVORCE)

I.  On or around June 8th 2009, after all else failed, defendant E,  coerced ( defendant A) to secretly divorce plaintiff, for not complying with his fraudulent schemes and he (defendant E) will see to it that the other attorneys defendant C, and D will falsely charge plaintiff with abandonment , fraud, and other illegal tactics, including stealing the Judith Jablon wedding ring, the same ring that defendant A, married plaintiff with and defendant A, admitted this in his deposition on June 8th 2010.

BACKDATING DOCUMENTS

II.  On June 16th 2009, plaintiff got a second opinion from attorney Larry Mraz of

Roselle IL.

III.  On or around June 16th 2009, plaintiff  explained the conversation  between herself and attorney Sadowski to attorney Mraz, plaintiff asked attorney Mraz, if he would  create a duplicate Trust  like the Judith Jablon land Trust and defendant A, land trust,  attorney Mraz explained to plaintiff  that he  did not want to get involved with or affiliate himself  with any attorney who backdates documents, he explained that the two TRUSTS were not the same, he explained the difference between the two trusts,  he also explained that the Judith Jablon Trust was not a simple land Trust as Attorney Sadowski alleged, he explained that the Judith Jablon Trust was a marital and a residuary Trust  and had a million plus dollars in it, he then (attorney Mraz) referred me to attorney Elliot Heidelberger.

Plaintiff has accidentally uncovered a crime of stolen money from a deceased womans Trust allegedly committed by Attorney Donald Sadowski that resembles a Ponzi Scheme. (see attached.)

NEW LIVING WILL

IV.  On or around July 7th 2009, defendant A, went to attorney Sadowski office, then came back to the Northbrook home with a new Living Will, that was backdated to the year 2000. Defendant A, stated that the new Living Will didnt take long to create and backdate, plaintiff asked defendant A, if she could make a copy of it, defendant A, said yes and gave plaintiff the new living will to copy.

VICIOUSLY ATTACKED

V.  On June 21ST  2009, Fathers Day, plaintiff was in bed with defendant A, when defendant A, son Joseph bust through the bedroom door and viciously attacked plaintiff, alleging that a few days prior, he overheard defendant E, telling defendant A,  that they were going to tell the courts that plaintiff has stolen money from the Judith Trust and secretly purchased a Florida dream home for herself, plaintiff put a restraining order against defendant A, son Joseph, he was not allowed in the Northbrook residence. (see police report).

CREDIT CARD ADDITION

VI.  On June 30th 2009, defendant A, drove plaintiff to Costco Warehouse to add her on his Costco account, defendant A, submitted his identification card,  plaintiff  submitted her identification card with her maiden name (Hausley) appearing on her I.D.
Plaintiff was given an American Express card from Costco.

FRAUDULENT CONCEALMENT,  ILLEGAL AND DECEPTIVE PRACTICE

A.  On June 2009 through September 2009, (defendant E) engaged in fraud, and conversion, deceptive practices that  resembles a Ponzi Scheme  regarding the Judith Jablons Trust, backdating documents, civil theft of plaintiff Florida home, secretly and illegally causing defendant A to file for a divorce under fraudulent concealment, which led to irreparable damage to plaintiff and defendant As marriage.

BRIBERY, NEGLIGENCE


B.  On September 2nd 2009, plaintiff, was told by defendant A, that defendant F, took a bribe from him to botch this divorce case so that the Judge will rule in defendant A, favor regarding plaintiff  Florida home and the outcome of the divorce proceedings.

ATTORNEY WICKER

C.  On or around September 5th 2009, plaintiff contacted the Florida attorney John Wicker who originally set up plaintiffs land Trust and asked him to check with the Florida Courts and see if plaintiffs gift home was fraudulently and illegally taken from her trust by defendants A and E.

MOTION TO AMEND TITLE

D.  On September 8th 2009, attorney Wicker stated that there was a MOTION TO AMEND TITLE filed on
June 16th 2009, by defendant E, fraudulently Alleging  that defendant A, mistakenly put the Florida home in the Mahoganys Crystal Trust , fraudulently  alleging that it was a non-existent Trust.

INTERCEPT

E.  September 8th 2009, Attorney Wicker then asked if  plaintiff  wanted him to go to court and intercept the process. Plaintiff  stated to attorney Wicker that  she  did, and I (plaintiff) have a divorce attorney name attorney Elliot Heidelberger,  you (attorney Wicker) and he (Elliot Heidelberger) can discuss legal procedures on how to keep plaintiffs Florida home in plaintiffs Trust.

MOTION TO AMEND TITLE

F. On September 8th 2009, attorney Wicker emailed plaintiff the documents (MOTION TO AMEND TITLE)  plaintiff immediately forwarded the documents to attorney Heidelberger.

FRAUDULENT CONCEALMENT, BREACH OF CONTRACT, NEGLIGENCE;

G. On September 8th 2009, and up until his release,  defendant F, ignored all requests made by plaintiff , to him and through his paralegal, to speak with attorney Wicker regarding what documents to file from Illinois to Florida that would make the Florida Courts aware of  the fraud between defendant A, and defendant E,  and that plaintiffs Trust does exists because the signed trust was not registered with the courts yet, estate attorney Donald Sadowski had destroyed the signed trust.

COURT ORDER VIOLATION

H. In October 2009  Defendant A, has stopped paying the co-payment on  plaintiff medical bills, he has stopped the temporary maintenance, that was a direct order from the Courts, during the divorce proceedings, under the fraudulent advice of his attorneys, defendant C, and defendant D, has filed frivolous orders to the courts, aiding and abetting defendant A,  into perjury alleging fraud  by plaintiff to defendant A. ( defamation of character).

 1.                                      Citizens for Legal Responsibility
                      Some Illinois Attorney Disciplinary Orders

                LAGATTUTA & DeGRAZIA, P.C.

2.  People of the State of Illinois v. Eddie Williams

FAILURE TO REPORT FRAUD AND CONVERSION TO THE PROPER AUTHORITY, FRAUDULENT AND ILLEGAL CONCEALMENT, NEGLIGENCE AND BREACH OF CONTRACT

I.   In June 2009, and up until his release,  after reviewing plaintiff  documents/proof,  defendant F, did not report the fraudulent and the illegal activities that was committed by defendants  A , C, D and E  to the Proper Authorities, including but not limited to  the misuse of the Judith Jablon Trust, and the fraudulent documents produced by defendants A and E, to the Florida Court, and the Cook County Courts, regarding the Mahoganys Crystal Trust and this fraudulent and illegal  concealment allowed defendants A, C, D, and E, to illegally and fraudulently defraud the Florida and the Cook County Court.

FRAUD AND CONVERSION, CIVIL THEFT, UNJUST ENRICHMENT

J. On or around October 2009, Defendant E, fraudulently  alleged to the Florida Court that the Mahoganys Crystal Trust does not exists and fraudulently alleged to have placed an undivided 54.72% interest in the Leonard J. Jablon Trust  ( defendant A )  and fraudulently alleged to have placed an undivided 45.28% interest in the Judith Jablons Trust, ( defendant  As  deceased wife )  defendant F, known or should have known that the Florida property was a gift in Trust to plaintiff,  purchased during plaintiffs and defendant As, marriage and by defendant F, not reporting this to the Proper Authorities, he concealed and allowed this illegal and fraudulent activity to happen , defendant E and defendant A, directed a conspiracy and scheme in which they filed and caused to be filed fraudulent and illegal documents to the Florida  and the Cook County Court, (a violation of the court order).

FLORIDA ATTORNEY

K.  On September 13th 2009 plaintiff spoke to attorney John Wicker, via the internet regarding computer hacking by defendant A, and he suggest that plaintiff  purchase a spy ware program call eblaster for protecting plaintiffs privacy  from her husband, while on the computer.

CONSPIRACY TO DEFRAUD, CIVIL THEFT, UNJUST ENRICHMENT

L.  On or around October 2009, defendants A, C, D, E, AND F, conspired and caused to conspire documents that was fraudulently filed and used to obtain the Florida gift home from the Florida Court to take the home out from plaintiff trust and placed into defendant A, wife trust, and used said fraudulent documents to  illegally file,  conceal, then  defrauded the Cook County Court.

www.judicialview.com/State.../Snyder-v-Elliot-Heidelberger/44/3268.

CONSULTATION

M.  On November 30th 2009, plaintiff had an appointment for a consultation with defendant B, plaintiff wanted a second (2nd) opinion regarding plaintiffs  Florida home, and the legalities of defendant F, allowing  defendant A and defendant E, to fraudulently  and illegally remove plaintiff Florida home from plaintiff  trust, which was a gift in Trust, and why defendant F, did not report the fraud to the  Proper Authority, plaintiff gave (defendant B) all court documents that was in her possession regarding plaintiff Florida home, and  the documents pertaining to the divorce with respondent

DECEPTIVE PRACTICE

N. On November 30th 2009,  defendant B, stated to plaintiff that she can clearly see that defendant F, was fraudulently and illegally screwing plaintiff over and that plaintiff should file a complaint against him with the ARDC, plaintiff asked who are they and what could they do for plaintiff.

ARDC

O. On November 30th 2009,  defendant B, stated that they are the Attorney registration and disciplinary commission.

P.  On November 30th 2009, defendant B, alleged that once the ARCD reads plaintiffs complaint and if attorney Heidelberger (defendant F) have money in his account that the ARDC will make him pay you (plaintiff) for your Florida home.

Q, plaintiff asked defendant B, if she would take my case, defendant B, stated that she would, but first plaintiff has to fire defendant F.

NEW ATTORNEY

R.  On November 30th 2009, Defendant B, quoted plaintiff her retainer fee 0f  $3,475.00  and said she defendant B will take the case but plaintiff first has to fire defendant F.

FIRED THROUGH EMAIL

S.  On December 1st 2009 plaintiff emailed attorney Heidelberger (defendant F) and fired him.

RETAINER

I.  On or around December 2009, plaintiff borrowed money from her good friend, to retain defendant B.

On  December 15th 2009, a motion of Elliot Heidelberger to withdraw as attorney for the petitioner.

SET FOR STATUS

January 15th 2009,  the matter for Elliot Heidelberger to withdraw was set for status.

ATTORNEY CLIENT AGREEMENT

II. On January 27th 2010  plaintiff, signed an Attorney Client Agreement with defendant B, and paid a retainer in the sum of $3,475.00.

NEW YORK

III.  On February 2010, plaintiff went to New York, to get away from the corrupt divorce proceeding that were taken place, while there plaintiff,  sold some of her old Jewelry that she purchased many years prior to meeting defendant A,  that was stored at her Schaumburg apartment, because defendant A, violated  the Judges order for maintenance, and he should have been held in contempt of court.

PROPER AUTHORITIES

IV.  In February 2010, , and up until her release, after reviewing plaintiff  documents/proof,  defendant B, did not report the fraud, the conversion and the illegal activities that was committed by defendants A, C, D and E, to the Proper Authorities, including but not limited to the misuse of the Judith Jablon Trust, and the fraudulent documents produced by defendants A and E, to the Florida Court, regarding the Mahoganys Crystal Trust and this fraudulent and illegal  concealment allowed defendants A, C, D and E, to illegally and fraudulently defraud the Florida and the Cook County Court, a violation of the court order.

ILLEGAL EVIDENCE

V.  On March 1st 2010 defendant B, called plaintiff and informed her that she had talked to defendant C, and was informed that  defendant A,  has fraudulently hacked into plaintiffs computer and they have copies of all of plaintiffs and defendant A, nude pictures that was taken from plaintiffs digital camera and downloaded onto plaintiffs personal computer, and defendant C, plans to use the fraudulent and illegal evidence against you ( plaintiff) in Court.

DEPOSITION

VI.   On June 8TH  2010, in defendant A, deposition, defendant A, stated that he married plaintiff  with the Judith Jablon wedding ring.

TRANSFER JUDGES

I.  On July 19th  2010, (defendant D) file a motion to transfer Judge, from Judge Bellows Courtroom 1602,   to  Judge Johnsons Courtroom 1903.

DECEPTIVE PRACTICE

II.  On September 1st 2010, plaintiff asked defendant B, why did opposing counsel change judge, (defendant B) deceptively alleged that she changed Judge, without plaintiffs approval/knowledge.

BREACH OF CONTRACT, NEGLIGENCE

III.  On   or around September 1st 2010, plaintiff  over heard defendant B, discussing a conversation that was between plaintiff and plaintiffs friend Ronald Friedman, to the opposing counsel, defendant C, telling defendant C that  plaintiff, plaintiffs daughter and plaintiff friend had lunch together, defendant C, later that day used an innocent lunch against plaintiff  and plaintiffs friend during questioning, alleging that plaintiff and her friend are lovers.

BRIBERY

IV.  September 2010, defendant A,  continually revealed to plaintiff that he is illegally paying defendant B to botch the divorce case to go in his favor.

BRIBERY, BREACH OF CONTRACT, NEGLIGENCE

V. On September 1st 2010,  Defendant B, alleged that she must withdraw as plaintiff attorney, after several attempts by plaintiff, defendant B, never answered yes or no to the bribery allegations that she did not take a bribe from defendants  A, C,D,E, and F, but defendant B, insinuated that defendant G, (Judge Susan Moira Johnson did.)

PRE-TRIAL,  DECEPTIVE PRACTICE AND BREACH OF CONTRACT, NEGLIGENCE.

A.  On September 1st 2010, (defendant B) never informed plaintiff that this was the day for pre-trial, never prepared plaintiff for the pre-trial hearing,  defendant B never discussed questions that would be asked during the pre-trial hearing, there was never a trial.

DEPRIVATION, NEGLIGENCE, OBSTRUCTING JUSTICE

B.  On September 1st 2010 defendant B,  and defendant G, deceptively deprived plaintiff of her right to allow plaintiffs witness to testify on plaintiffs behalf, claiming that it was too late for witness to testify.

PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE

C.  On September 1st 2010 defendant B, fraudulently alleged in her billing statement that there was a pre-trial conference; entered into settlement negotiations - parties did not settle hearing scheduled for September 8th 2010.

PRE-TRILA NEGOTIATIONS

D.  On September 1st 2010, plaintiff, did not attend a pre-trial conference, alleged by (defendant B), plaintiff was unaware of a pre-trial conference, plaintiff was unaware of any negotiations.


PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE
E.  On September 8th 2010, there was never a pretrial conference,
Plaintiff was never aware of a  PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE, OR A TRIAL ever taken place during this divorce that was alleged by (defendant B).

PLAINTIFFS TESTIMONY NOT RECORDED

F.  In September 2010 while plaintiff  was being questioned under oath ,defendant B, deliberately asked the type of questions that allowed defendant C, to object , so plaintiffs testimony would not be recorded.

ATTORNEY FEES

G.  In September  2010, defendant B, written a bogus fee petition for respondent to pay attorney fees, defendant G asked that she re-write it.

NEGLIGENCE, SPOILATION   (OF EVIDENCE )

I.  On or around September 30th 2010, defendant B, did not present plaintiffs proof/ documents into evidence, alleging that defendant G ordered her not to submit..  Depriving plaintiff of the right to present evidence further disabling plaintiff with emotional stress.

OBSTRUCTING JUSTICE, NEGLIGENCE,  DEPRIVATION

II.  On or around September, 30th 2010, again, defendants B, and G, deceptively deprived plaintiff of the right to allow plaintiffs witnesses to testify on plaintiffs behalf.

FRAUD AND CONVERSION ON  FORECLOSED DOCUMENTS, UNJUST ENRICHMENT

III.  On November 22nd 2010 Plaintiff  testified that defendant A, and defendant C and D,  committed fraud and conversion  by conspiring to file documents with the Illinois Circuit Court, alleging that defendant As helicopter company was bank foreclosed, when instead defendant A  and defendant C and D, transferred defendant A, helicopter business out of his name and into the name of defendant As friends company name (Dan Asher).    (see attachments).

DEPOITION TRANSCRIPT

IV.  On November 30th 2010, plaintiff, requested a copy of defendant A, deposition transcript, defendant B, deceptively alleges that plaintiff fee for a copy would cost $2, 250. 00   plus  $178. 00. (I have the email).

CHANGE OF COURT DATE

V.  On January 25th 2011, plaintiff  went to court, on her scheduled court date in courtroom 1903, plaintiff was told by Judge Johnsons clerk that Judge Johnson was presiding in court room 1602, plaintiff went to court room 1602, then was told by defendant G (judge Johnson ) and not told by defendant B that plaintiff court date was changed to February 8th 2011.

CHANDE OF COURT DATE

VI.  Defendant B, never informed  plaintiff  that the January 25th 2011, court date was changed to February 8th 2011.


CHANGE JUDGES


VII.  February 2011 plaintiff discovered that (defendant D) filed the motioned to change Judge, and not defendant B as she alleged.

FRAUDULENT CONCEALMENT, ILLEGAL AND DECEPTIVE PRACTICE, CONSPIRACY AND NEGLIGENCE

VIII.   On February 8th 2011, (defendant B), re-wrote her fee petition after conspiring with defendant C and defendant G, to defraud the Cook County Court, and filing illegal and fraudulent documents, then defendant G, tried to Purged the documents. (fee petition for defendant A, to pay denied).

NO COURT REPORTER

A.  On February 8th 2011, There was NO Court reporter during session, session was not recorded.


DECEPTIVE  PRACTICE,  FRAUDULENT CONCEALMENT

B.   On February 8th 2011, defendant B, did not make any arguments on behalf of  plaintiff ,  for  the return of plaintiffs Florida home, located at: 5242 Fleming St, Port Charlotte Fl. 33981, which was a gift in Trust.

DUE PROCESS

C.  Plaintiff was not  given a fair hearing in a State Court proceeding, deprivation of property without due process.

2001 NISSAN ALTIMA

D.  On February 8th 2011, a frivolous order was issued by defendant C, and granted for plaintiffs 2001 Nissan Altima to be reserved, a vehicle that was purchased/ paid in full during plaintiffs first marriage in 2005. (non-marital property),  also the same vehicle in which Judge Bellows  in October, 2009, ordered that defendant A, cannot take because that was plaintiffs vehicle before the marriage.

LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCY

E.  On February 8th 2011, defendant B, and defendant G, allowed defendant C, to file a fraudulent motion for law enforcement agency to comply, while plaintiff was in the courtroom, without regards to habeas corpus.

STAY OF EXERCUTION

F On February 8th 2011, defendant B and defendant G, allowed defendant C, to fraudulently and illegally filed through the Circuit Court of Cook County, while plaintiff was in the courtroom, a stay of Execution (allowed).

ATTORNEY FEES

G.  On February 8th 2011, defendant B, filed her petition for attorney fees to be paid by defendant A, which somehow was denied, petition for attorney fees to be paid by plaintiff, was somehow allowed the sum of over $19,000.00 defendant A, B and defendant C and G, was aware that plaintiff is indigent.

FINANCIAL STATEMENT, FRAUDULENT CONCEALMENT


H.  On or before February 8th 2011, defendant B, didnt submit plaintiffs, January 2011, financial disclosure statement to the Court, alleging that defendant G ordered her not to.

PARTY TO PURGE

I.  On February 8th 2011,  defendant C,  motioned for PARTY TO PURGE  (allowed by defendant G).

WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY, BREACH OF CONTRACT, NEGLIGENCE

1. On or around March 4th 2011, defendant B,  filed a motion, substitution  and/ or withdrawal of attorney from the petitioners case, after many months of threatening to remove herself from plaintiffs case, after plaintiff questioned defendant B, regarding a bribe that defendant A, alleges she took, defendant B, alleged that there is a bribe on the table, but she defendant  B, didnt take the bribe, but insinuated that a higher Authority did (defendant G).

Any judge or attorney who does not report a judge for treason as required by law may themselves be guilty of misprison of treason, 18 U.S.C. Section 2382.


REAONABLE DEGREE OF CARE OR SKILL IN REPRESENTING HER CLIENT

2.  On March 2010, through March 2011, defendant B, failed to exercise a reasonable degree of care or skill in representing her client,.

FRAUDULENT CONCEALMENT, DECEPTIVE PRACTICE , NEGLIGENCE AND BREACH OF CONTRACT.

3.  On or around March 9th 2011, defendant F, mailed plaintiff, a bill, fraudulently alleging that plaintiff owe him several thousand dollars For his services which the court ordered defendant A, to pay, and defendant A, paid plaintiffs attorney fees to defendant F.  (see attachment).

NEW ATTORNEY.

4.  On March 10th 2011, plaintiffs family hired an attorney by the name of Michael Moore, who was present on the next court date which was March 22nd 2011.

NEW ATTORNEY, MICHAEL MOORE

5.  On March 22nd 2011, plaintiffs new attorney Michael Moore, appeared before the court, to file his appearance and to address the fraudulent and illegal  contempt of Court, and default  charge that was illegally placed on plaintiff,  attorney, Mr. Michael Moore was given twenty one days to file his written appearance.

FAILED TO FILE AN APPEARANCE

6.  March 22nd 2011, defendant C,  entered another fraudulent default order against the Petitioner/Counter-Respondent, (fraudulently) alleging  that Petitioner/Counter-Respondent failed to file an appearance and answer for March 22nd 2011.

FRAUD, CONSPIRACY , NEGLIGENCE, DECEPTIVE PRACTICE , SCHEME , CIVIL THEFT AND UNJUST ENRICHMENT

7.  On April 4th  2011, defendant C and G  directed a conspiracy and scheme, in which they fraudulently filed and caused to file  fraudulent and illegal documents ( Judgment for dissolution of marriage) through the Cook County Court that Plaintiff/Counter-Respondent was in default,  and that Plaintiff/Counter-petitioner was personally served an order of default papers on February 9th 2011.

Judges have given themselves judicial immunity for their judicial functions. Judges have no judicial immunity for criminal acts, aiding, assisting, or conniving with others who perform a criminal act, or for their administrative/ministerial duties. When a judge has a duty to act, he does not have discretion - he is then not performing a judicial act, he is performing a ministerial act.


8.  Plaintiffs divorce case has been Severely Compromised and therefore Corrupted.

FRAUD AND CONVERSION, DECEPTIVE PRACTICE,  NEGLIGENCE, CONSPIRACY,SCHEME, UNJUST ENRICHMENT

9.  On April 4th  2011, defendants , C and G, directed a conspiracy and scheme, in which she filed and caused to file this frivolous document  ( Judgment  for dissolution of marriage) through the Cook County Court that petitioners Florida home, which is a gift in Trust, and bought during plaintiff and defendant As marriage, has been illegally and fraudulently Turned into defendant As,  non-marital property and percentages were placed into defendant A,  and defendant As deceased wife (Judith Jablon) Trust.

SWORN OATHS

10.  All defendants ( attorneys and the Judge)  in question, has taken  SWORN OATHS OF OFFICE to uphold the law, yet they have broken an abundance of laws in THIS case, all defendants should be Audited, Disbarred, and Sanctioned.

Any judge or attorney who does not report a judge for treason as required by law may themselves be guilty of misprison of treason, 18 U.S.C. Section 2382.

NO CONTACT RULE    

A. On April 4th 2011,  by defendant C, own admission, on page 2 of said hearing, misrepresented the Courts by fraudulently alleged that she (defendant C ) as a courtesy, sent a copy and notice of todays hearing and the order of default to attorney Michael Moore and Mrs. Jablon, (plaintiff)  (see attached).

NO  CONTACT   RULE.     

B.  Mrs. Jablon,  (plaintiff)  had an attorney, by the name of Michael Moore, there would have been NO need to send a copy and notice to plaintiff.

HEARING FOR DEFAULT

C.  Plaintiff or her attorney Mr. Michael Moore, has NEVER received a Copy of the hearing for default prove-up set forth on April 4th 2011 and the Divorce was granted on that date.

D.  Defendant A, was a great husband, and plaintiff has never used her ex-boyfriend or her ex-husband as a comparison to defendant A.

PERJURY, AND MISSUSE OF THE JUDITH JABLON TRUST

E.  On April 4th 2011, Page 7, of said hearing, if  defendant A, has suffered stress or anxiety, and loss of sleep, its because of the fraudulent  concealment and illegal practice that has taken place and the misuse of the Judith Jablon Trust, the perjury committed and defendant A, is in fear of being audited and sanctioned as a proximate result.

PERJURY, NEGLIGENCE AND FRAUD AND CONVERSION

F.  On April 4th 2011, Page 8, question and answer  6, through 11, of said hearing on April 4th 2011, defendant C, known or should have known that she made frivolous statements and  directed her client (defendant A,)  to answer loaded  and leading questions, aiding and abetting  defendant A, and defendant C into Perjury.  


BUSINES OWNER

G. On April 4th 2011,  Page 11, of said hearing on April 4th 2011, defendant C, known and or should have known that defendant A, owns a helicopter business, buys and sells helicopters each and every year, he buys and sell stocks and bonds, he also owns a furniture store aside from receiving  half of his deceased wife Social Security and his full Social Security benefits, is a helicopter pilot, and owns a fleet of helicopters, with two or more employees, and that defendant A, specializes in group tours, helicopter charter, and rides.

INDIGENT

H.  On April 4th 2011, Page 12, defendant C, known and should have known that plaintiff is not able to support herself, fully without the support from defendant A.

FRAUD, DECEPTIVE PRACTICE, NEGLIGENCE,   AND PERJURY

I. On April 4th 2011, Page 12, of said hearing, defendant C,  known and should have known that she aided and abetted her client into perjury by fraudulently alleging that the Florida property,  which was a gift in Trust to plaintiff, during the marriage, that was discussed during defendant A, and plaintiff deposition, and pre-trial, has now been fraudulently and illegally,  placed into the Judith Jablon Trust, and the Leonard Jablon Trust.

WORLD POINT CREDIT CARD

J.  Plaintiff, was not issued a world point visa credit card, after separating from defendant A.

FRAUDULENT CONCEALMENT

K.  Plaintiff, has never missed a court appearance during this divorce, but somehow defendant C and defendant G, set up an April 4th 2011 court date without the knowledge of  plaintiff  or her  attorney Mr. Michael Moore.

REAL PROPERTY

L.  April 4th 2011, page 8, of said hearing, numbers 6 through  11, defendant C, in open Court,  and under oath, question defendant A,  and assisted him into  perjury, fraud and conversion by alleging that defendant A, did not acquire any real property and defendant A, and plaintiff never acquired property together.

EMANCIPATED

M.  On April 4th 2011, page 10, of said hearing, number 2, defendant C, known or should have known, that she assisted her client ( defendant A) into perjury, by  fraudulently alleging that his sons are emancipated.

PERJURY, DECEPTIVE PRACTICE, NEGLIGENCE, AND FRAUD

N.  On April 4th 2011, page 10 of said hearing, in open court, under oath, defendant C, known or should have known, that she assisted her client, (defendant A,) into  perjury by assisting him in his fraudulent answers  to  number 5 through 15.

PERJURY , FRAUD AND CONVERSION

O.  When an attorney willfully and intentionally assist his/her client into PERJURY,  FRAUD  AND CONVERSION in open court, under oath, that attorney is as guilty of perjury,  fraud and conversion  as his/her client, and should be disbarred and sanctioned.

Q.  On July 11th 2011, Kathleen Bono quoted a price of  $450. 00 plus another $178. 50  for her service and fee, she ( Kathleen Bono) alleged that she repeatedly attempted to contact defendant B, via telephone, email, and fax for payment of $ 178. 50 for her service and fee for June 8th 2010  deposition, and if I (plaintiff) wants a copy of defendant A, deposition then plaintiff would have to pay $450. 00  plus $178. 50 for her service and fee, that defendant B, neglected to pay.

CONTRACT

T.  All Defendants, failed to comply with a contract or the duty not to violate Constitutional rights, and a marriage contract, all defendants, known and should have known that they  participated in wrongdoing by covering up fraud, discrimination and conversion, participated in fraud and conversion, malfeasance, civil theft, negligence, dereliction, malpractice, perversion,  injustice, infliction, evildoing, dishonesty, unjust enrichment , professional misconduct, defamation of character, breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty, illegal and deceptive practices,  bribery, and not one of them  reported the fraud , conversion , malpractice,  deception etc. to the proper authorities and plaintiff has suffered unnecessary Severe emotional distress, as a direct and proximate result of all the defendants fraudulent, illegal, and deceptive practices/ schemes, AND THEY SHOULD BE SANCTIONED.

Plaintiff has contact the ILARDC,  regarding the attorneys in question, they refuse to investigate, they went as far as to say in their letter to me quote that there is no attorney registered to practice law in Illinois with the name Learetta Tyson or a similar name, end quote yet Attorney Learetta Tyson has been practicing in Illinois for twenty years or more.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L9HSR5EcuxI

IN RE J.H., A MINOR
(THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, PETITIONER-APPELLEE,
v.
RUTH H., RESPONDENT, (ALMA LEARETTA TYSON, COUNSEL FOR MOTHER-RESPONDENT, APPELLANT)).

Plaintiff has exhausted all finances.

This divorce case has been severely compromised, contaminated and therefore corrupted, I would like my divorce re- tried.
All defendants has ruin my life

My husband and I are very cordial with each other, I am not paranoid, my allegations are the Truth and nothing but.

My divorce was illegally obtained, therefore, I dont know if  Im still married or am I illegally divorced.

I have an abundance amount of Proof/Documents, everything but the payoff, I just have my husbands word.

I am seeking a contingency lawyer to file a lawsuit.

I have sent my complaint to every government official that I can think of and to this no avail.

 The Cook County States Attorney office (Anita Alverez) alleges that you must first file a police report before they can file charges, but this crooked Judge Moira Susan Johnson blocked me from filing a police report by placing this Bogus and frivolous body warrant on me for contempt of court in order to cover-up her crimes.

criminal enterprise. U.S. v. Murphy, 768 F.2d 1518, 1531 (7th Cir. 1985).
The United States Supreme Court recently acknowledged the judicial corruption in The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals held that the Circuit Court of Cook County is a Cook County, when it stated that Judge "Maloney was one of many dishonest judges exposed and convicted through 'Operation Greylord', a labyrinthine federal investigation of judicial corruption in Chicago". Bracey v. Gramley, case No. 96-6133 (June 9, 1997).

Thank you

Pat