;
  • Report:  #277921

Complaint Review: Leewood Homes /New Home Marketing/Jami Church - Wichita Kansas

Reported By:
- wichita, Kansas,
Submitted:
Updated:

Leewood Homes /New Home Marketing/Jami Church
3500 N. Rock Rd Wichita, 67212 Kansas, U.S.A.
Phone:
316-636-5290
Web:
N/A
Categories:
Tell us has your experience with this business or person been good? What's this?
Im a realtor in Wichita Kansas that has worked with alot of great subdivisions. You see most subdivisions, look forward and in a positive way towards realtors brings buyers to help sell the homes they have for sale. But Im afraid so far this group is the worst Ive ever dealt with.

I brought a buyer to them that yes, had been there at one time or two without me present, now this has happened before where someone Ive dealt with goes out just to check things out without me standing over them, and in the past the realtor at the subdivision has been happy to understand this fact, but not with this group and not esp. with Jami Church(the on site realtor).

The fact is my buyer had met her in the past and didnt want to ever work with her alone, because I directed him back to the table on a home he liked out there, even tho he told me the realtor he met Jami Church was going to be their as long as I was with him hed be interested in putting in a contract. This company tho has decided that since my buyer was out thier a few times without me they are not going to pay any stardard commissions.

Jami Church said shes talked with my client without me around and felt since she did Im not owed a standard amount, because I guess she feels like it took so much of her time. What about the fact Ive spent several hours driving around the city days on end looking for homes for this guy, with her all she has to do is sit at her office and wait in comfort only in her area. Using little to small amounts of her gas and time.

She is a disgrace, and her builder she works for is also trying to act above the law, but more so In this crazy house market, for one on site agents shouldnt be so combative with buyers Like the one I directed back to the home with them because he kept mentioning it too me, even tho they told me when they did go without me there Jami Church wasnt very nice too them, and they after doing that felt very uncomfortable being with her without me there again. But also strange that a builder would be so uncooperative in paying another realtor bringing the buyer to him.

So I warn any realtors in the Wichita Kansas area to stay far away of New home Marketing developments/ Leewood Homes or if they do, make sure they are with there people everytime when they are out there. Dont let them fool you into thinking they are nice to realtors or even buyers, after all the buyer I had said when he was out there, their where problems with the onsite agent Jami church in the beginning. Ive never complained about another agent in the past but in this case they deserve it.

Mike

wichita, Kansas

U.S.A.


4 Updates & Rebuttals

Agent

Wichita,
Kansas,
U.S.A.
Response to an untrue article posted by Mike Hopper from Wichita,KS

#2UPDATE Employee

Mon, December 17, 2007

I am writing this letter in response to an untrue article written by Mike from Wichita KS. It is unfortunate that Mike was not paid a full commission for this real estate transaction. My seller agreed to pay Mike a reduced fee of $1500 as a courtesy to one of our buyers and not because this agent deserved, earned or was owed any kind of a commission in this sale. Our real estate association has a service where agents can arbitrate to claim a commission if they were owed one and not paid. Mike Hopper's office never attempted to arbitrate for a commission in this sale (which is smart considering Mike had broken so many real estate rules in this transaction). In short these buyers, when asked, stated they did not have a real estate agent, which Mike admits. They did not visit once or twice they worked with me for almost a year and never once brought along or mentioned anything about looking at other homes around town with Mike Hopper. Mike also admitted to sneaking into my sellers home without permission (which is against the law) and he wrote a contract and asked for a commission after he was advised by me that the seller was not willing to offer him one because he had never been present during a single visit with these customers. A complaint has been filed against Mike with the Kansas Real Estate Commmission and with the Wichita Area Association of Realtors for his unprofessional conduct regarding this matter. It is a shame he has come to this web site to attempt to defame the good name of my company, myself and my builder. His disgraceful business practices seem to have excluded him from seeking any professional or legal recourse in this matter so its possible he felt this was his only option for venting his frustrations.


Agent

Wichita,
Kansas,
U.S.A.
Response to an untrue article posted by Mike Hopper from Wichita,KS

#3UPDATE Employee

Mon, December 17, 2007

I am writing this letter in response to an untrue article written by Mike from Wichita KS. It is unfortunate that Mike was not paid a full commission for this real estate transaction. My seller agreed to pay Mike a reduced fee of $1500 as a courtesy to one of our buyers and not because this agent deserved, earned or was owed any kind of a commission in this sale. Our real estate association has a service where agents can arbitrate to claim a commission if they were owed one and not paid. Mike Hopper's office never attempted to arbitrate for a commission in this sale (which is smart considering Mike had broken so many real estate rules in this transaction). In short these buyers, when asked, stated they did not have a real estate agent, which Mike admits. They did not visit once or twice they worked with me for almost a year and never once brought along or mentioned anything about looking at other homes around town with Mike Hopper. Mike also admitted to sneaking into my sellers home without permission (which is against the law) and he wrote a contract and asked for a commission after he was advised by me that the seller was not willing to offer him one because he had never been present during a single visit with these customers. A complaint has been filed against Mike with the Kansas Real Estate Commmission and with the Wichita Area Association of Realtors for his unprofessional conduct regarding this matter. It is a shame he has come to this web site to attempt to defame the good name of my company, myself and my builder. His disgraceful business practices seem to have excluded him from seeking any professional or legal recourse in this matter so its possible he felt this was his only option for venting his frustrations.


Agent

Wichita,
Kansas,
U.S.A.
Response to an untrue article posted by Mike Hopper from Wichita,KS

#4UPDATE Employee

Mon, December 17, 2007

I am writing this letter in response to an untrue article written by Mike from Wichita KS. It is unfortunate that Mike was not paid a full commission for this real estate transaction. My seller agreed to pay Mike a reduced fee of $1500 as a courtesy to one of our buyers and not because this agent deserved, earned or was owed any kind of a commission in this sale. Our real estate association has a service where agents can arbitrate to claim a commission if they were owed one and not paid. Mike Hopper's office never attempted to arbitrate for a commission in this sale (which is smart considering Mike had broken so many real estate rules in this transaction). In short these buyers, when asked, stated they did not have a real estate agent, which Mike admits. They did not visit once or twice they worked with me for almost a year and never once brought along or mentioned anything about looking at other homes around town with Mike Hopper. Mike also admitted to sneaking into my sellers home without permission (which is against the law) and he wrote a contract and asked for a commission after he was advised by me that the seller was not willing to offer him one because he had never been present during a single visit with these customers. A complaint has been filed against Mike with the Kansas Real Estate Commmission and with the Wichita Area Association of Realtors for his unprofessional conduct regarding this matter. It is a shame he has come to this web site to attempt to defame the good name of my company, myself and my builder. His disgraceful business practices seem to have excluded him from seeking any professional or legal recourse in this matter so its possible he felt this was his only option for venting his frustrations.


Agent

Wichita,
Kansas,
U.S.A.
Response to an untrue article posted by Mike Hopper from Wichita,KS

#5UPDATE Employee

Mon, December 17, 2007

I am writing this letter in response to an untrue article written by Mike from Wichita KS. It is unfortunate that Mike was not paid a full commission for this real estate transaction. My seller agreed to pay Mike a reduced fee of $1500 as a courtesy to one of our buyers and not because this agent deserved, earned or was owed any kind of a commission in this sale. Our real estate association has a service where agents can arbitrate to claim a commission if they were owed one and not paid. Mike Hopper's office never attempted to arbitrate for a commission in this sale (which is smart considering Mike had broken so many real estate rules in this transaction). In short these buyers, when asked, stated they did not have a real estate agent, which Mike admits. They did not visit once or twice they worked with me for almost a year and never once brought along or mentioned anything about looking at other homes around town with Mike Hopper. Mike also admitted to sneaking into my sellers home without permission (which is against the law) and he wrote a contract and asked for a commission after he was advised by me that the seller was not willing to offer him one because he had never been present during a single visit with these customers. A complaint has been filed against Mike with the Kansas Real Estate Commmission and with the Wichita Area Association of Realtors for his unprofessional conduct regarding this matter. It is a shame he has come to this web site to attempt to defame the good name of my company, myself and my builder. His disgraceful business practices seem to have excluded him from seeking any professional or legal recourse in this matter so its possible he felt this was his only option for venting his frustrations.

Reports & Rebuttal
Respond to this report!
Also a victim?
Repair Your Reputation!
//