- Report: #1065832
Complaint Review: RRFS - Red Rock Financial Services - Las Vegas Nevada
-
Author Not Confirmed
Why?
RRFS - Red Rock Financial Services
445 W. TECO AVE STE. 140, LAS VEGAS, NV 89118 Las Vegas, 89118 Nevada, USA
Phone:
702-932-6887
Web:
rrfs.com
Categories:
Business Rating:
(0)
Tell us has your experience with this business or person been good?
RRFS - Red Rock Financial Services FOR SAPPHIRE RIDGE LMA SUPPORTS PAYMENT FOR COMPANY WHO DOES NOT DO THEIR JOB Las Vegas Nevada
I have received a certified letter dated June 24, 2013 in which you claim I owe 916.80 to Sapphire Ridge LMA; I am going to dispute this because of the facts presented here.. First this amount of money is not true as the quarterly amount is 75.00 w/late payment charges of 25.00. So, the most that I would owe would be 100.00 for the quarter of Jan-March 2013; and 100.00 April-June 2013. In addition, I have been in and out of the hospital since Jan 2013 due to severe injuries and staying with my family due to the multiple surgeries as a result, THE COMPANY WAS NOTIFIED.
Compounding these issues is the fact that Sapphire Ridge LMA has continually fallen short on what they are supposed to do; "they want to be paid for a job not done, (I have pictures) and the fact my insurance has been cancelled twice on the grounds that the brush behind my home is a fire hazard. These people have been told multiple times regarding these issues. Also the Fire Marshall has been out taking pictures; once again because they have failed to do what they are being paid for. Year after year we are charged for jobs undone!! I am tired of paying someone when they are not doing their job. They are a "landscape and maintenance" company; hired to do that very job, they just are not doing it. Would you pay someone for something when they are not doing their job? My guess is NO; well neither do I want to pay someone for not doing their job; I have a feeling that a judge will not approve either. Also as long as I need to seek legal assistance in this matter now; I may as well seek damages for having to purchase new homeowner insurance at a higher price because of them; not once, but twice for the same reason, and also the associated legal fees (and punitive damages as indicated) . This is absolutely ridiculously ludicrous that this is a recurring issue that they believe they should be paid for not doing their job.
