- Report: #1534169
Complaint Review: UK ACIM LTD Glenn E Bovin - Walton-On-Thames, Surrey
-
Author Confirmed
Why?
UK ACIM LTD Glenn E Bovin
88 Clements Road, Walton-On-Thames,, KT12 3LY Surrey, United Kingdom
Phone:
+46 72 538 58 82 / +44 78
Web:
https://acim.nu/
Categories:
Business Rating:
(0)
Tell us has your experience with this business or person been good?
UK ACIM LTD Glenn E Bovin Glenn Bovin Advance Fee Fraud, Misrepresentation Walton-On-Thames, Surrey
Glenn Bovin represented a SBLC provider requiring issuance fees. Was alerted that he has defraused multiple parties in the past and I should not do business with him.
https://www.linkedin.com/posts/ninajansdotter_nitrilegloves-ppe-scam-activity-6736186894184419328-1Q_V/?trk=public_profile_like_view (autotranslated)
Yes you nina I sold 60 million boxes that Glenn elfving bovin the big fraudster from Uppsala had in customs at Arlanda and then he had 40 million boxes left this person can talk hotel skaris bankruptcy every year some companies are in bankruptcy ski park 360 he got millions in grants when he was going to build the world's largest in houses ski slope business ban no some slide on just watch out for this man
https://www.facebook.com/untnyheter/posts/tingsr%C3%A4tten-har-beslutat-om-att-meddela-glenn-elfving-bovin-n%C3%A4ringsf%C3%B6rbud-d%C3%A5-han/10160686987543854/
All information to be translated
Further cases of upfront fee victims who called me telling me I should stay clear of him
In our dealings all his correspondence address is C/O Las Accountants Llp No.1 Royal Exchange London EC3V 3DG United Kingdom when this has changed. He constantly also changes his details on the UK company register not to be pinpointed.
We were given a contract with a short expiry date. When we tried to conduct due diligence the information on Purchase Assignation Agreement was fraudulent. He insisted on £85000 be provided to his company and his intention to work directly on behalf of the provider. I traced the provider on another email address (they didnt provide) stating since he did provide access to the provider we intend on paying him but he should step aside and that we pay the SBLC provider directly
Whether he was phishing on the provider is still being investigated
Other financial service providers also had an issue with him and he tried to badmouth them when he already provided fraudulent instruments to them
