Bart
Springfield,#2Consumer Comment
Thu, December 27, 2007
I was going by what the OP posted. I would assume that info like that would be included in any info sold but I have no clue and then thought that maybe it isn't. Thanks for the info.
Bart
Springfield,#3Consumer Comment
Thu, December 27, 2007
I was going by what the OP posted. I would assume that info like that would be included in any info sold but I have no clue and then thought that maybe it isn't. Thanks for the info.
Steve
Bradenton,#4Consumer Suggestion
Thu, December 27, 2007
If the OP pressed the issue, the result would be the same. As far as that court order goes, there is no difference between a creditor and a debt collector. It is illegal for ANYONE to even attempt in any way to collect on a debt discharged in BK. Ignorance is no excuse. It is called "due diligence". A collector should verify the validity of a debt BEFORE attempting to collect on it. They chose not to, and now they can pay the price!
Bart
Springfield,#5Consumer Comment
Wed, December 26, 2007
"The court order states in section 4 all creditors are prohibited from attempting to collect any debt that has been discharged in this case. They violated a United States Bankruptcy court order" It is NOT a creditor trying to collect this debt. It is a third party debt collector. Big difference. Take solice and have a few laughs at the fact that the creditor took the collection agency for a few bucks on this uncollectible debt by selling it to them.