Tubbs Brothers
Sandusky,#2REBUTTAL Owner of company
Fri, September 21, 2012
Although this customer never contacted me personally, he did file a complaint with the Better Business Bureau. A copy of my response to the BBB follows. It addresses each of the customers accusations. Since this letter and offer, I have heard nothing from the BBB or the customer. It is important to understand that my company has been servicing local customers of nearly 60 years. We pride ourselves on customer service, in fact, if you google us you will see reports from many very satisfied customers. You can also view customer testimonials on our website www.tubbsbrothers.com Unfortunately, as stated in the response to the BBB the customer has falsely accused my employees of not only drinking, but also unethical business practices without any basis for truth. He is confrontational and abusive and his behavior has prevented any attempt to provide any type of assistance to him. I have offered my personal contact information to him without any response. (my direct line is 810-648-3383 for anyone who would like to discuss this including the customer) In any case, my response to his accusations follow:
August 15, 2012
Carla Appleton
BBB of Detroit & Eastern Michigan
26777 Central Park Blvd., Ste. 100
Southfield, MI 48076-4163
RE: Case #9155922
Dear Ms. Appleton:
In answer to your letter dated 8/6/2012, I have reviewed Mr. xx complaint with all of the employees who were involved. I will address each point individually and then provide a summary.
Mr. xx states that the safety inspection sheet indicated, that there was a pull to the right. I have enclosed a copy of the inspection repair order. It does reference a pull to the right and indicates we aligned the vehicle at that time. Document is labeled A Mr. xx states that he and his wife returned to the dealership, spoke with xxx, our General Manager, and told him of my experience. In fact, he accused my employees of being drunk and insulting his son. That is a complete falsehood and my General Manager was right to defend our staff. xx indicated to me that Mr. xx was abusive and confrontational at this time. We did accept Mr. xx offer of $200 less than our asking price and we did have our service department check for a vehicle pull. xx our Service Manager took the vehicle for a ride and found no pull, only a slight drift to the right which is a normal condition due to road crown.
In an effort to reduce the drift, xx said that he added 8 lbs of air to each tire and crossed switched front tires (tires can cause drift and sometimes crossing them will change this). xx test drove again and found everything good. Customer drove vehicle at this time and said pulling problem was corrected. Ive attached xx statement labeledB. Mr. xx stated that he took the vehicle home and found that the left front tire had 10 pounds of pressure and the right had 42 pounds. This is very unusual since xx had just checked pressures and we found no air leaks in the tire. Furthermore, a tire with 10 lbs of pressure would be nearly flat and most likely would overheat and become ruined within a few miles of driving. More telling is that Mr. xx accused us of intentionally altering the tire pressures to correct his complaint. Not only would this be unethical, it would also expose us to liability should a tire fail and cause an accident.
On July 20, Mr. xx returned and indicated (or his son indicated) the vehicle pulls right while braking. Our technician found that the left front brake caliper was sticking intermittently and recommended replacing the sticking caliper as well as rotors and brake pads. When informed of this, Mr. xx denied that the vehicle pulled on braking and again became confrontational and abusive to my service personnel. He then walked into my General Managers office, became abusive with him and stormed out. Mr. xx was scheduled to return the vehicle the following Monday to complete the detail and put the vehicle back on our alignment rack with Mr. xx present so that he could personally see the specifications. Mr. xx did not return for his scheduled appointment.
Attached are copies of all the inspections and repair orders related to Mr. xx vehicle as well as copies of the sales documents. Upon review, we know that the vehicle has a brake caliper that sticks intermittently. Its possible that this began sometime between our original safety inspection and the sale of the vehicle, however, since Mr. xx never indicated a pull on braking until 2 weeks after he took delivery, its just as possible that it occurred after the purchase. (A pull on braking is a completely different complaint than a pull while driving) Additionally, our original safety inspection documents dont indicate any brake problems and in fact show 70% brake lining remaining (document C).
What is most apparent is that Mr. xx is his own worst enemy. He has been confrontational, accusatory and abusive since he first entered my dealership. He has managed to insult every person he has come in contact with. This attitude prevents resolution to any problem because Mr. xx cant control his temper long enough to work out satisfactory solution. Typically we would make, at minimum, some type of goodwill adjustment or repair in a case like this. Unfortunately,
Mr. xx's behavior prevented this conversation from ever taking place. Despite this, I am willing to participate in the repair cost of the brakes. Our original estimate was $444 and I am willing to split that cost with Mr. xx. That being the case, this offer is only good if Mr. xx can control himself and behave in a civilized manner. Should he become abusive with any of my personnel I will retract my offer and Mr. xx will be asked to seek automotive services from another source.
Please feel free to present this offer to Mr. xx. If Mr. xx would like to pursue this solution, please have him speak with me directly. If you would like to discuss this matter further you can reach me on my direct line, 810-648-3383.
Regards,
Tubbs Brothers, Inc.